Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

The end of an era

U.S. driving declines

Posted by David Roberts at 5:09 PM on 07 Jul 2008

I've seen this graph cited and reprinted here and there on the interwebs, but it's worth looking at again, if only to remind ourselves that something fundamentally different for the U.S. economy is underway:

DOT traffic trends

This is from a U.S. Department of Transportation report (PDF) on traffic trends.

must verify this

it looks to me like, based on a USA population growth rate of ~0.9%, VMT per capita has been dropping for at least three years, before (and not including) the recent plummet.

Not to be grumpy...

...and at the risk of getting eye-rolling from Dave, but gas prices have doubled, and the driving is only going down a few percent.  The country has become so  stuck in a car-centered lifestyle that it evidently will be very difficult to come down.. but other than that, great news!

Well

Until of course, when these types of things kick in.
http://autobloggreen.com/2008/05/07/who-else-thinks-the-p ...

And there won't really be much of a problem powering em.
http://greyfalcon.net/plugins4
http://greyfalcon.net/plugins7
http://greyfalcon.net/solarthermal
http://greyfalcon.net/energy2.png

-David Ahlport

Which Will be a While or Maybe Forever

Especially at $4000 a pop. Currently hybrids and electrics just aren't worth the extra money unless someone really drives a lot. Even the industry only expects 5 million to be sold per year by 2015. That is only 5% of all cars sold.

As fuel sales decline either by people not driving or by people switching to more fuel efficient vehicles, so will the gas tax revenue that funds highways. Since no one seems to want to pay any taxes at all, the roads and bridges will continue to crumble making driving a poor option even if the fuel issues are solved.

Driving is going way down before it starts going up again if it ever does.

Oops, that is $6,000 to $10,000

Yikes, I didn't do my research. Sorry.

http://www.pnl.gov/news/release.asp?id=204

Since, PHEVs are expected to cost about $6,000 to $10,000 more than existing vehicles - mostly due to the cost of batteries -- researchers evaluated how long it might take owners to break even on fuel costs. Depending on the price of gas and the cost of electricity, estimates range from five to eight years - about the current lifespan of a battery.


break even on batteries

That economic assessment in the PNL link gave a high range of $3.50. In your country the average price is already over $4. In Canada it's almost $5.20 US. What will the price be in eight years when that battery needs to be replaced?

PHEV break even points

there's a linked study (pdf) -- they assume $2.50/gal for that "break-even" estimate. from page 5:

Figure 1 shows the life-cycle-cost analysis results for purchasing and operating a PHEV compared with a conventional high-fuel-efficiency vehicle such as a Honda Civic. The results are expressed by diagonal break-even lines for varying gasoline prices. Each break-even line in the figure assumes a specific gasoline price and delineates a region below and to the left of the line in which a PHEV would have a lower life-cycle cost than a conventional vehicle and therefore would justify a premium purchase price. This is described as a cost-effective region. Above each line is the region where the PHEV is not cost effective. The premium can be read off the horizontal axis for a given electricity price. For instance, using California average residential rates of 12 cents per kWh and a price of the gasoline of $2.50 per gallon, the break-even point for the purchasing premium is $2,000 for California.  In the state of Ohio, with lower electric rates, the break-even point at the gasoline price of $2.50 per gallon is $3,000 (see Figure 1).

estimating based on their chart, at current CA residential electricity price (rounding up: 15¢/kWh) and gas price ($4.50/gal) i think the break-even point -- the sticker price difference between honda civic and honda civic plug-in at which the "plug-in" pays for itself over the life of the car -- is somewhere above $6,000.

current price difference between civic and civic hybrid is a little hard to figure out because the range for civic sedans runs from $15,000 (stick shift and spartan trim, compared to hybrid) to $21,000 depending on options. hybrid price is about $22,000.

(con'd)

i've said this here already but a lot of people i know think plug-in hybrids are the big thing and i don't.

over the next few years almost all of today's cars in the USA will lose tons of resale value because of sucky fuel efficiency. on top of that, there's no telling how much people will be able to borrow, given current circumstances. how long will our slump last? how much will banks be willing or able to lend. how many people will get pulled into the red. ok. yada yada yada, bears instead of bulls, financial crisis, etc.

this puts the plug-in hybrid and even the regular HEV somewhere out in dreamland for most households. under similar circumstances japan transformed its kei car program to make the cars more appealing and useful to families. if gas prices are really up for good now we may have to do the same thing, at least until affordable 5-seater EVs are available -- unless we're willing to subsidize HEVs to the tune of something like $5000 per, for the whole fleet. or more.

Car sharing services

Carpooling

Vanpooling

Telecommuting

Shorter work weeks

Job sharing

Increased frequency of bus routes

All these are short term options that will take the edge off a lot faster than replacing our car fleet with whatever whizbang new vehicle comes along.

grist.org

aw c'mon, what about neighborhood EVs?

They're here, there are thousands of them, and yeah, they don't go more than about 30 mph, they don't have "oomph", they have a low range, but they work and...did I mention they're here?  With some decent transit, you could drive them to stops and back.  check out GEMcars, at least...

i'll take...

carpooling, vanpooling, shorter work weeks, expanded bus service

but not sure about...

...car sharing services, because i don't know how actual trips these would offset, in moderate to low density america. (did people notice the miles driven dropped much more outside the cities?)

...telecommuting, because fewer people will be pushing paper, not more, as the twenty-teens get going.

...job sharing, because ditto, and if money's tight, "i need the hours."

got nothing against NEVs of the future. current crop: seems like a lot of money to pay not to be able to use the highway. GEMs look fine. this is more what i was hoping for.

Should I burn down my in-laws' house?

My inlaws live alone (2 people) in a 5,000 sq. foot home that they heat and cool at incredible cost.  Since they have lots of space, they fill it with lots of useless stuff, including an extra refrigerator, which is kept running in the basement year-round even if all it's got in it is an ice-cube tray.  So, my question is, which would release more carbon into the atmosphere...letting them continue blundering through life wastefully until they kick the bucket of obesity/diabetes/heart disease in another 15-20 years, or burning their house down now and forcing them to downgrade to a much smaller, more efficient, more affordable home.  I've tried to convince them that they need to rent out 2/3 of their home as apartments but they're old people...which you know means they're greedy resource hogs who voted for Shrub twice.

Also, while I'm at it, should I put sugar in the gas tank of their Astro van?  How much carbon would that put into the atmosphere versus them driving it around for another 10 years?

Il faut cultiver notre jardin.

you should...

...get a divorce. don't wait to be dumped, it's not manly.

Hapa

snark
chuckle

Shorter Work Weeks

I agree with the shorter work week trend. I recently brought up the idea to my company since I travel 32 miles one way. I estimated a savings of over $500 annually at current gas prices. They thought it was a great idea and now offer the 4x10 shifts. I would recommend everyone to bring up the idea to their employer.

Catching Our Breath

The problem with automobiles is we don't drive them enough.  If we did, we would realize true efficiences.   Now that we are finding vast amounts of abiotic oil in Brazil and the Bakken Formation, we can finally realize the suburban dream for the many millions of people trapped in urban centers, living in one bedroom condoes and forced to ride pride-sapping "light rail" systems.


AHA

AHA!  Now I know you're a Grist staffer in disguise just trying to keep the posting lively.  Tee-hee... funny...

Bailo you're hilarious



You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks