Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Summit like it hot

G8 leaders head to Hokkaido where Bush and his sherpa will provide climate guidance

Posted by Kate Sheppard at 4:49 PM on 02 Jul 2008

Muckraker: Grist on Politics

On Monday, George W. Bush will travel to Hokkaido, Japan, for his eighth and final G8 summit, where climate change is likely to be the subject of heated (ahem) talks. At last year's meeting, leaders agreed to seriously consider a goal of cutting global greenhouse-gas emissions 50 percent by 2050.

But the Bush administration continues to resist mandatory targets, and in a speech on Wednesday, Bush made sure to again emphasize "technologies" over regulation. "I'll be reminding people that we can have better energy security and we can be better stewards of the environment without sacrificing economic growth," said Bush.

He also said he would urge other leaders of the Group of 8 not to act without developing countries: "Look, we can't have an effective agreement unless China and India are a part of it. It's as simple as that. I'm going to remind our partners that's the case."

Also on the agenda for this year's summit: increasing development aid to Africa, fighting HIV/AIDS and malaria, and the global food crisis.

In addition to the G8 gathering, several fringe meetings of world leaders will take place in the near future. Japan has invited Australia, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, South Korea, and South Africa to a separate meeting on climate change on July 9. Bush is planning to host his own side meeting of the "major economies," which includes Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Korea, South Africa, and the European Union.

Meanwhile, the world is getting antsy about whether a new deal will be in place when the Kyoto Protocol expires in 2012. International negotiators at the last meeting in Bali last December agreed to start two years of talks with the goal of having a new treaty in place at their meeting in Copenhagen in late 2009.

While we're on the subject, contemplate this befuddling exchange from Bush's press conference:

Reporter: Can you tell me what is the outlook for getting an agreement with the emerging economies that will limit emissions in a meaningful way in the mid term? What's the outlook for that and how ...

BUSH: Well, the first thing is to make sure we get an understanding that all of us need to agree on a long-term goal. And part of the reluctance has been on some nations that are major economies to participate at all because initially, I'm confident, they thought they were going to get a free pass from any international agreement.

I mean, after all, the Kyoto international agreement excluded, you know, major economies. And therefore, they probably think well, maybe history will repeat itself. The idea is to say, look, we want to be effective. Effectiveness comes when major economies come to the table.

The first step is to agree to a long-term goal. And, you know, I've talked to our sherpa about that. And he feels pretty good that people are now coming to that clear understanding that we're going to have to come to a long-term goal.

Sherpa? Bush has a sherpa? And he provides knowledge and guidance on climate issues?

USA is a waste of time

It is hard to imagine anyone at this meeting paying very much attention to what George W. Bush has to say.  Much more interesting will be what happens in conversations amongst the other players.

Also, host-nation Japan has been rather passive lately.  One wonders if their best-and-brightest have figured out a way to get their high-tech-savvy but resource-poor country out of its slump.  Becoming the international GW-mitigation leader might do the trick.

One might add, though, regretfully, that Japanese full-blown participation in cetacean slaughter and endangered tuna-catching is probably not an issue that will be raised.  So let us hold off, for now, on the greenness of the Land of the Rising Sun.

Meanwhile, from the promotional materials that have been published, the location in Hokkaido looks gorgeous!  Lucky ambassadors!

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

Why wait for others?

Your president's plan to wait for other nations to reduce emissions is a recipe for our collective destruction.

Even a small emitter such as Australia has a good argument for action even when other nations don't. The recent Garnaut report makes the case for action, including urgent implementation of an Emissions Trading Scheme.

For links and a brief analysis of the major challenges see http://canberrabureaucrat.blogspot.com/

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks