|
Staff Contributors
Staff Contributors
Adam Browning
Adam Stein Alan Durning Andrew Dessler Andrew Sharpless Ariane Lotti Ben Tuxworth biodiversivist Brad Johnson Coby Beck Edward Mazria Eric de Place Erik Hoffner Frank O'Donnell Gar Lipow Glenn Hurowitz Guest author Jason D Scorse Jim Goodman JMG John McGrath John McQuaid Jon Rynn Joseph Romm Josh Dorner Ken Ward Kit Stolz Laura Hess Lisa J. Bunin Lou Bendrick Maywa Montenegro Melinda Henneberger Meredith Niles Michael Hoexter Michael Moynihan Miles Grant Sean Casten Sharon Astyk Steph Larsen Stephanie Paige Ogburn Summer Rayne Oakes Thomas Dobbs Van Jones Zoe Bradbury |
||||
Must read CIBC report: $7 per gallon gas by 2010Ten million cars off the road, 1970s style GDP growthPosted by Joseph Romm (Guest Contributor) at 1:02 PM on 26 Jun 2008CIBC World Markets has just released a stunning yet detailed economic analysis of near-term oil prices and impacts. The PDF has some excellent figures I will convert to JPEGs.
The two key pieces are "Getting off the Road -- Adjusting to $7 per Gallon Gas in America" (PDF) and "Oil and Growth -- That 70s show Re-Run" (PDF). Main points:
The analysis seems very solid and suggests the only thing that can "save" us from near -- $7 gas by 2010 is a major global recession, but even that would only be a temporary respite. The implications for Detroit are staggering:
It looks like plug-in hybrids will be introduced not a moment too soon. And certainly not soon enough to avoid a steady decline in vehicles miles, according to CIBC:
CIBC says we're going to become like (shudder) Europeans and Canadians! (Although this particular production should probably be taken with a grain of salt, since the CIBC analysts are, after all, Canadians.)
This will ultimately require a major investment in public transit, an area that this country lags enormously behind Europe:
I do believe this country is going to be dramatically changed by our failure to plan ahead for the inevitable. As CIBC notes, this will be different from most previous oil shocks in that the duration of the price shock is likely to be much longer: The longest running continuous oil spike in U.S. history lasted seven quarters, while we expect oil prices, at least on a trend basis, to be headed higher right through 2012. CIBC also points out another reason this oil shock will be different: Moreover, one of the earlier arguments for why oil might matter less these days is rapidly disappearing. Until recently, it was commonplace to dismiss the oil shock by pointing to the fact that the US economy, with its shift into services, had become signifi cantly less energy intensive than it was in the 1970s, when oil shocks did so much damage. But although US crude oil expenditures currently make up only 4 percent of GDP, this share will grow to 9.5 percent over the next three years as crude prices hit an average of $200/bbl in 2010. In terms of oil's share of spending, we're right back where we started from. Doh! I would also add that this is different from previous oil shocks in that in the 1970s many different sectors of the economy relied on oil, including industry and the power sector. Now it is primarily one sector of the economy, transportation, that is an oil monoculture -- and that sector as had a much more difficult time transitioning to alternative fuels than other sectors. One last note: The other industry that is going to be devastated by high oil prices are the airlines. I will blog on the likely changes in air travel later. This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
|
sign in
Search Gristmill
Using Gristmill
Recent Comments
|
|||