Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Flood money

Midwest woes a boon to fertilizer companies

Posted by Tom Philpott at 3:00 PM on 19 Jun 2008

The recent Midwestern floods have caused all manner of misery: Burst levies, lost homes, ruined crops, higher food prices, a gusher of agrichemicals and god know what else flowing into streams.

One way to soothe the sting is to own shares in giant fertilizer companies like Potash Corp. of Saskatewan and Mosaic. These companies have seen their share prices jump over the past week.

Investors may be bidding them up because the floods represent a sales opportunity. To maximize yield on what's left of the 2008 corn crop, farmers will be scrambling to reapply fertilizer to make up for what's run off and evaporated due to soggy conditions.

How much will they be laying on? I asked John Sawyer, an Iowa State University agronomist who works with farmers as an extension agent. He said it's too early to tell, because farmers are still assessing their fields to figure out what can be salvaged.

He added that in salvageable fields, farmers will likely be applying about 50 pounds of nitrogen per acre. Before planting, farmers typically 150 and 170 pounds per acre. So these reapplications will likely represent a significant income boost to the fertilizer giants -- and yet another source of nutrients to leach into streams, clear down to the Mississippi.

Yep Tom

Good point!  And that leaching will release huge amounts of GHG in the form of methane from the cellulose stored in wetlands where it ends up.

It will also cause huge weed overgrowth, temporarily soaking up some cO2, yes.  But it will be rereleased (in a 21x worse GHG form) as that weed overgrowth kills the lakes and the weeds and fish die and turn into methane too.

I recently found out that human urine contains all the fertilizer needed to grow enough crops to feed that person's needs in the food chain.  Then on the Green network they showed the simple 2 part process that separates the fertilizer in the urine so it can replace chemical fertilizer.

And of course the compounds dumped in the waterways from urine, like hormones and antibiotics are killing and mutating wildlife,  

It strikes me that recycling the fertilizer from urine and replacinmg ever more expensive shipped and mined fertilizer would more than pay for breaking down the contaminants in the waste stream and keeping our aquifers safe and actually recycling waste water itself.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin

We Can Only Hope ...

that all the chemical farmers go broke and their land is subdivided and taken over by small organic ones.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks