Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

A national environmental policy?

New paper demands consideration of global warming in federal policy decisions

Posted by Joseph Romm (Guest Contributor) at 2:33 PM on 08 May 2008

This post is by ClimateProgress guest blogger Kari Manlove, fellows assistant at the Center for American Progress.

-----

The fact that our country has a National Environmental Policy Act means we should have a national environmental policy, and any national environmental policy is bound to take into consideration global warming, right?

Wrong on two counts.

The U.S. is sorely lacking an updated environmental policy. It's been over a decade and counting. With the EPA as example, and based on its condition as of late (see here and here), the climate's looking grim.

As for a cohesive national policy that takes into account global warming's causes and impacts? Think again. States have been infinitely more active than our federal government (and we thank them).

Presented with this gaping problem, Christopher Pyke and Kit Batten co-authored and released a paper Tuesday entitled "Full Disclosure," calling for an executive order by the next president to require consideration of global warming into federal policy decisions under the National Environmental Policy Act. They argue the government has this ability and is already authorized under NEPA to exercise it.

The paper's release was celebrated with an event hosting former Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, Professor Jonathan Cannon, former EPA Administrator Carol Browner, and co-authors Pyke and Batten. You can read a brief description here.

The description closes as Sec. Babbitt closed his keynote, and as I think it's worth closing this post. The magnitude of global warming -- its causes, its solutions, its consequences -- is such that it forces a question so simple and straightforward, one that we often neglect and yet one that will ultimately define our country and our leadership: Does our government have the honesty and compassion required to talk to its citizens about their future?

Right now, we don't. But we should, and we could ...

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Immediate politcal expediency trumps all

Honesty and compassion have not exactly been the hallmarks of the U.S. government. We're in pretty bad shape when Nixon was our most environmentally friendly President of the past century.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks