Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Better homes and gardens

The NYT on urban farming

Posted by Tom Philpott at 10:50 AM on 08 May 2008

Viewed through a wide lens, the world's troubles seem overwhelming: climate change, pointless war, spreading hunger, surging food and energy prices, etc. There's a tendency to seek big-brush answers to these vast problems, to ask: what's The Solution? Failing inevitably to find it -- much less implement it -- we plunge deeper into despair and political impotence.

Of course, taking a broad view of the world is critically important. But that perspective may be better at providing fodder for analysis than it is at delivering real answers. Our problems may be so big precisely because we tend to think so big. The real action may be in small things; the real solution might be in lots of little solutions.

I got to thinking about this after reading an excellent New York Times piece by Tracie McMillan on a topic dear to my heart: urban farming. Writes McMillan:

For years, New Yorkers have grown basil, tomatoes and greens in window boxes, backyard plots and community gardens. But more and more New Yorkers ... are raising fruits and vegetables, and not just to feed their families but to sell to people on their block.

By no means is this just a New York City phenomenon:

This urban agriculture movement has grown even more vigorously elsewhere. Hundreds of farmers are at work in Detroit, Milwaukee, Oakland and other areas that, like East New York [an economically devastated Brooklyn neighborhood], have low-income residents, high rates of obesity and diabetes, limited sources of fresh produce and available, undeveloped land.

What could make more sense than growing food amid dense settlements, generating income and healthy food in areas that lack broad access to either?

The trend has been developing for years. I visited the farmers market run by East New York Farms -- the one highlighted by McMillan -- way back in 2003. Already it was buzzing with excitement, and much of the food on sale had been grown within blocks of the market.

McMillan provides a great overview of where urban farming stands five years later. She highlights success stories, like Milwaukee's legendary urban farm Growing Power, a one-acre wonderland of "plastic greenhouses, compost piles, do-it-yourself contraptions, tilapia tanks and pens full of hens, ducks and goats." Growing power grossed $220,000 from that small plot last year, McMillan reports.

Projects like Growing Power offer a much more hopeful vision of the future of food production than ones like this: a bunch of central bankers sitting around and plotting a world in which industrially grown commodity crops whip around the world, unfettered by local concerns.

That vision inevitably trains itself on places like the Amazon rain forest, already being gobbled up in service of globalized industrial-food production. One of the world's great industrial-ag magnates recently offered up this bit of wisdom:

With the worsening of the global food crisis, the time is coming when it will be inevitable to discuss whether we preserve the environment or produce more food. There is no way to produce more food without occupying more land and taking down more trees.

Such thinking may be big, but is it smart? Hearteningly, McMillan reports that the U.N. may be beginning to take urban agriculture seriously.

The city's success with urban farming will receive international attention on Saturday when, during an 11-day conference in New York, 60 delegates from the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development are scheduled to visit Hands and Hearts [a market garden in Brooklyn], the Bed-Stuy Farm and two traditional community gardens in Brooklyn.

U.S. city planners, take note. Cities don't always embrace the pioneers who turn abandoned land into centers of biodiversity and food production. In L.A. a couple of years ago, city officials cravenly handed South Central Community Farm over to a developer. That fellow bulldozed an extraordinarily productive farm; last I heard, he intended to erect in its place a warehouse for distributing goods imported from Asia to Big Box stores throughout the West.

In New York in the late 1990s, a profoundly petty fellow called Rudolph Giuliani tried by fiat to auction off most of the city's community gardens, including many profiled by McMillan. Happily, because of concerted organizing by activist-gardeners, that attempt ended up scarcely more successful than Giuliani's presidential lunge.

Sometimes small is big and bad

I live next to a community garden run by my small city. Unfortunately, when I calculated the carbon footprint of these one hundred small plots (10 ft X 20 ft), I was forced to admit that these gardeners would generate 300-fold less CO2 if they just picked up their trucked in produce at the grocery store.

Now, if they would stop driving to the garden, that would be a different story.

Small scale actions with global reach


The real action may be in small things; the real solution might be in lots of little solutions.

I completely agree that we shouldn't discount actions which are labeled 'small-scale' or 'local', and I think urban agriculture is a great example (although perhaps human power - previous comment - could suggest some kind of car pooling arrangement?)

Let's not forget, however, that even these 'small' actions can resonate on a large scale. Sustain, a UK-based group campaigning for better food and farming has recently released a report detailing a knowledge/expertise-sharing exchange between urban farmers in the UK and the US.

I am sure that knowledge of these shared experiences - even at a great distance - will help and inspire those initiating urban agriculture projects in the UK in coming years.

The Right To Grow Food

Thank you for the post. I especiallly appreaciate...

"The real action may be in small things; the real solution might be in lots of little solutions."

You might want to be more assertive. Real action emerges from small actions and real solutions consist of lots of small solutions.

The silver-bullet thinking displayed by our current leadership is archaic and non-productive. One would imagine they're capabe of  recognizing this. Aren't busines folks always going on about having "diverse" investment portfolios?

As individuals. as a nation, and as a species, we need a diverse food portfolio and a diverse energy portfolio. Both might buffer families and communities from inevitable climate, social, political, economic, et cetera instabilty. Why don't "conservatives" get this? Why don't they help, rather than hinder, urban gardening?

I'm particularly concerned about legal "instruments" that prevent people from growing their own food if they should decide to. When we were searching for a house, we learned that it is not unusual for developers to sell homes with certain restrictons built into the deed, presumably to protect the value of the houses. For example, no vegetable gardens in the front yard or visible from the road! Or, one is allowed to plant only certain trees! They don't want those "unsightly" tomato plants by the front door or "messy" fruit littering the sidewalks.

This is occurring for relatively low-cost homes, not just the larger ones. It is hard enough to find an affordable house in a convenient location. I doubt many people worry about whether they can grow tomatoes if they develop an interest in it later on.

Is this happening elsewhere in the country? Or is it an isolated phenomenon?

Aren't they driving to the grocery store too?

I have a community garden plot about 20 minutes from my apartment and yes I do drive to the plot. However it is on my route to work and often I will stop before or after work to pick a few weeds and gather produce for supper, much the same way I go to the store on my way home to get grocery's. I don't think it increases my carbon footprint any more to drive to my garden plot. In the fall/winter I don't have to take as many trips to the store because of all the veggies I have stocked up. PLUS all my plants are soaking up all the carbon they can get!!

Beyond environmental reasons I garden because I love eating stuff I planted myself with seeds I saved from the year before, I love the feel of soil under my nails and I love the feeling of joy as all those little plants pop out of the ground and start climbing for the sky! Everyone should get to have a hobby and mine just happens to be one of the most environmental out there!

Like snowflakes we are each frail but together we can stop traffic

Restricting Food Growth

Built-in restrictions aree all over the place in new development, and they are almost always anti-green.  I've seen them say you can only build a certain size home (ie big.)  They require grass often, they tell people they can't have certain animals, grow veggies, all kinds of stuff.

Totally absurd in the present climate.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks