|
Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors
|
||||
Rep. Bartlett hits House on renewables -- and I don't mean Gregory HouseTime to focus on tax credits, not Lieberman-WarnerPosted by Joseph Romm (Guest Contributor) at 3:59 PM on 21 May 2008
Everybody loves to see people with seemingly inexplicable symptoms saved from sure death. No doubt that explains the fascination with the Lieberman-Warner bill. But people ... I've been trying to be gentle about this ... it's dead. Sure, like Amber on the season finale [spoiler alert!] L-W can be briefly revived so we can say goodbye to it forever, but that is really just a soap opera gimmick. We don't need to say goodbye to L-W; we need to focus all our effort on those important bills that are still clinging to life, bills that haven't already signed a contract to appear on another TV show next season -- like the investment tax credit that is crucial to keeping the momentum going on core technologies that can avert catastrophic climate change (see Barlett op-ed and PG&E op-ed). To L-W supporters, I can only offer this eulogy: L-W has passed on! It is no more! It has ceased to be! L-W's expired and gone to meet 'is maker! It's a stiff! Bereft of life, it rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed 'im to the perch 'e'd be pushing up the daisies! 'Is metabolic processes are now 'istory! 'E's off the twig! 'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisibile! This is an ex- OK, that wasn't really a eulogy. But the point is, the wind and solar tax credits must be saved. As Bartlett (R!-MD) wrote: Maintaining consistent federal incentives for renewable energy policy will free up American businesses and workers to do what they do better than anyone in the world: innovate. That will result in American rather than German, Japanese or Chinese ownership of intellectual property and emissions-free electricity. More domestic production of energy will also reduce reliance upon foreign energy sources. House members could compromise and support H.R. 5984, which has already been approved 88-8 by the Senate. Shouldn't that be a no-brainer? As PG&E's chairman, CEO, and president wrote: Failure by Congress to renew the credits could cost the United States more than 100,000 jobs and billions of dollars annually in new investments. These losses would be felt across the country, in states such as California, Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington ... So let's stop trying to save the dead parrot and focus on the damn tax credits. Where is the Gregory House of the U.S. House? This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
For story: Rep. Bartlett hits House on renewables -- and I don't mean Gregory House 2 Comments | Post a Comment You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
|
sign in
Search Gristmill
Using Gristmill
Recent Comments
|
|||