Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Betting on the future

Private equity firm buys rights to rainforest reserve's environmental services

Posted by biodiversivist (Guest Contributor) at 4:54 PM on 21 Apr 2008

rainbow insect
Photo: Smccann via Flickr
This picture of what appears to be an insect with rainbows flying out its butt was taken in Guyana.

There are untold, untapped, unknown chemistries created by millions of years of evolution harbored in what remains of the planet's biodiversity. This is a vast storehouse of information, which would provide humanity with centuries of medicines and other benefits if we can just find ways to preserve it.

We can't let our biodiversity disappear -- one interesting (and gross) example of its importance is in this video I found on YouTube, documenting one of the unending evolutionary struggles between lifeforms. We are also locked in an evolutionary struggle with microbes. Many of today's most important medicines got their start in nature. Penicillin and its derivatives, for example, came from a mold.

Mongabay has a hopeful article about an equity firm betting on the future:

"How can it be that Google's services are worth billions, but those from all the world's rainforests amount to nothing?"

A private equity firm has purchased the rights to environmental services generated by a 371,000-hectare rainforest reserve in Guyana. Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but the agreement is precedent-setting in that a financial firm is betting that the services generated by a living rainforest -- including rainfall generation, climate regulation, biodiversity maintenance, and water storage -- will eventually see compensation in international markets.

In exchange for funding a "significant" part of the costs of maintaining Iwokrama rainforest reserve in Guyana, the agreement grants U.K.-based Canopy Capital the right to 16 percent profit from proceeds generated from environmental services payments. 80 percent of the income generated would go to local communities while the Global Canopy Programme, an alliance of 29 scientific institutions in 19 countries, would receive four percent.

The game plan is to get in early while rainforests are still cheap.

Hylton Murray-Philipson, the guy behind this idea, has spent several years in Brazil and watched other attempts to preserve rainforests fail. He's been learning from their mistakes. The key, of course, is good governance, and apparently Guyana has what we do not -- a real leader:

"We can deploy the forest against global warming and ... it wouldn't have to stymie development in Guyana," President Jagdeo told The Independent last November. "We are a country with the political will and a large tract of standing forest. I'm not a mercenary, this is not blackmail, and I realize there's no such thing as a free lunch. I'm not just doing this just because I'm a good man and want to save the world, I need the assistance."

I've noticed lately that just about every article talking about ecosystem destruction or impending famine eventually ends up mentioning biofuels somewhere:

Climbing prices for gold and timber, coupled with surging demand for biofuels derived from sugar cane, have raised concerns that developers may push for infrastructure improvements that could transform Guyana's forests.

And while I'm on the subject, let me run a few numbers for you: 371,000 hectares = 1,432 square miles. Roughly 35,000 square miles of crops were diverted to American gas tanks last year. Assuming that Third World farmers are half as efficient at squeezing food out of an acre of land as America's industrial ag industry, you might expect 70,000 acres to be put under the plow to make up for our shortfall in the human food chain, and 70,000 - 1,432 = 68,568 square miles of carbon sinks that need to be saved from our cars.

In this interview, Murray-Philipson was asked what motivated him. He talked about this being the last chance to halt global warming but later let slip that he has two young boys and that he is worried about their futures. I can't think of better motivation.

More on Guyana's Forests

See Time and New Scientist stories on the same subject.

interesting

Yes, this sort of arrangement of monetizing ecosystem services looks to be one way forward. The discussion we had about it recently here

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/3/18/84752/1564

was pretty good, and then I turned up this eg of it being done with rainforests, maybe you saw this too:

http://www.globalcanopy.org/main.php?m=4&sm=16

Erik


The Orion Grassroots Network: 1,200+ grassroots groups working for conservation & more

Cutting biofuel subsidies

Cutting subsidies for biofuels and their freedstocks is vital.  I'm not sure what this investment will really do?

Will it eventually lead to monetizing air, water, and earth itself?  I think that's the eventual aim.  It scares me.

These efforts all feel like hedge fund..green.  I always suspect that bottomline considerations will kick in somewhere down the line.  When some company disguised as environmental buys these rights someday.

Then who can stop the destruction, government wilderness preservation  may be strictly ceremonial by then.  A few more generations of bonnie prince duuhbya type leadership and it's a distinct probability.

Then it'll be chinese, dalls, and saudi  billionaire vacation homes in Yosemite.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

Huh, I seemed to have missed that post, Eric

Some real good discussion followed.

Those links to Time and New Scientist also contained some pearls, Maywa.

I hear you Dr.X. This may turn out to be a write off. Experiments by billions of entrepreneurs sharing knowledge over the Internet is our best bet.

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world

link to the previous discussion again

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/3/18/84752/1564

Beyond my comments there, I would add that this project should not even be considered w/o some understanding of the fraud exposed in the "more flexible" parts of Kyoto we bullied in, i.e. CDM and offsets. This was written several years before Nature really broke the story in 2007.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1209-08.htm

I found this other article interesting. The position they take isnt so appealing to me, but it's an insight into how the local politics play out...
http://www.chicagotribune.com/services/newspaper/printedi ...

I'm pleased w/ certain externalities being recognized, but for the reasons above, maintain a cautious optimism as Kyoto is updated w/ this new push for including "deforestation prevention."

amazingdrx: Will it eventually lead to monetizing air, water, and earth itself?

I have definitely heard the idea of trading "rain credits" tossed around. Anyone see "Memron"?

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks