Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors
Gristmill

The solution beneath our feet

As food prices rise, policymakers ignore potential of home and community gardens

Posted by Guest author (Guest Contributor) at 12:20 PM on 11 Apr 2008

This is a guest essay by Bill Duesing, executive director of the Northeast Organic Farmers Association of Connecticut. It originally aired on WSHU Public Radio in Fairfield, Conn.

-----

"Gardens are viewed as 'hobbies' by most politicians/bureaucrats and administrators and are seldom taken seriously as real sources of real food," says a University of Connecticut agricultural extension specialist, speaking of the United States Department of Agriculture. This attitude represents a serious impediment to a healthy, and sustainable food supply and society.

Backyard garden. Photo: Laura Gibb via Flickr
Photo: Laura Gibb

Feeding a growing population with shrinking resources without polluting the planet is one of the greatest challenges facing us, locally and globally. The USDA is the world's largest agricultural research and extension organization. If it doesn't take gardens seriously as "real sources of real food," we are in real trouble.

Although we know that organic food sales are growing at over 20 percent annually, the USDA hasn't collected statistics on organic farms. In Connecticut, there are about 40 certified organic farms, which, like many of the farms in this country, tend to be small and part-time. They probably produce and sell less than a million dollars worth of produce a year.

But there is also an abundance of vegetables and fruits produced in home and community organic gardens. A skilled home gardener can produce amazing quantities of food using only hand tools, compost from kitchen and yard wastes, and human energy.

The more than 20,000 subscribers to Organic Gardening magazine here in Connecticut provide a rough estimate of the scale of organic food being produced in gardens for home consumption. Although some subscribers may not have gardens, that number is probably offset by organic gardeners who don't purchase the magazine.

Eighteen years ago, author and activist Marny Smith created a 250-square-foot garden out of part of the asphalt parking lot at Save the Children's Westport office.

A 250-square-foot garden is about the size of an average living room, which isn't that big. It would take 174 of these small gardens to equal to one acre. But study after study has shown that per unit of land and energy, small, hand-tended growing areas can be many times more productive than large farms are.

Marny kept careful records of the produce harvested from her garden. In a pamphlet published by Save the Children, Marny wrote that, according to 1979 supermarket prices, the produce from that living room-sized garden in a parking lot was worth over $320. And that was nearly two decades ago!

Now, if 22,000 organic gardeners in Connecticut produced only as much as this small, first-year garden in a parking lot did, they would grow organic vegetables worth over $7 million -- again, at 1979 prices. Without even counting for inflationary effects, home garden produce here certainly dwarfs commercial organic agriculture. If fact, it looks like home organic production may have about half the monetary value, and many times the social and educational value, of vegetable sales from all the farms in Connecticut. There are fewer than 4,000 farms in this state.

The homegrown produce is even more valuable, though, to the gardeners. They would need to earn more than $400 in order to have $300 left with which to buy vegetables, after paying income taxes.

Those homegrown vegetables also have value for the rest of us. They don't need all the packaging that produce from Mexico and California requires. They also don't need roads, trucks, or transcontinental highways; homegrown food doesn't leave a trail of pollution across the country and around the world.

A home garden directly connects children and adults to a productive and sustainable relationship with the earth.

By ignoring these "real sources of real food," the USDA misses an opportunity to promote agriculture that not only is the most environmentally friendly but that also produces the freshest and tastiest food possible.

Excellent suggestion!

I fondly remember the backyard gardens that my grandfather and two great-uncles kept, in southern New Jersey.  My grandfather grew tomatoes, broccoli, peppers, green beans, cucumbers and squash; and he once experimented with corn.

Nowadays, I live in an eight-floor coop apartment building in NYC, so no gardening opportunities are immediately available.  But I dream of persuading my neighbors to OK the conversion of the roof into a community garden.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

more than a hobbie for some of us

I'm fortunate enough to have a very large garden and I can confirm that it is a resource that should be more utilized wherever possible. I am able to produce a large portion of my dietary needs with organic foods that tastes great and I know are safe to eat. Corn, tomatoes, peppers, herbs, squash etc....most folks don't know what they're missing and the "work" itself is a great way to get your "zen' in. Helping to feed others is good for the soul. I encourage everyone to plant a little "personal victory" garden.

800 to 1000 square feet

I read a book that claimed a person could have an intensive garden in which they could feed themselves on 1000 square feet for males and 800 square feet for females.  It added up only the nutritional values, not whether a person would like the food or not.

I've also read that if the area that was lawn was intensively gardened, we could feed the country on what we grown there.    Lawn would include what was next to all buildings and golf courses.


We have done this before.

In WWII they were called Victory Gardens and everybody that could grew one. I don't know if they made a difference in time of rationing or not but it made everyone feel they were in it together.

We are all in this save the planet thing together, I feel it would be a moral booster if not very efficient.

In appalachia we farmed and gardened right up unil the baby boomer generation. Unfortunately we let years of know how and heirloom seeds get away from us. They all kept livestock and chickens so it was natural gardening for long periods of time.

I have seen soil that has been tended for over 150 years and is still rich black and procuctive. All it ever has put on it was natural fertilizer.

My family on my mothers side come in here and set up a mill so really the only thing they ever went to the store for was salt, coffee and sugar, in the food line of course.

It can be done but its a lost art, subsistance farming is tough and this generation won't take to it in droves.

The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.

Gardening in Australia

I live in one of the unusual parts of Australia (the Otway Ranges) which doesn't really suffer much from drought.

I've been astonished at how much can be grown in a relatively small garden with very little effort plus a lot of poo. It's totally organic, but I have a healthy population of small song birds which effectively keep the insects under control. It supplies most of the vegetable needs of three people.

Five chickens supply all out eggs.

I made a cage trap to catch rabbits (which are feral here) that were trying to get through the fence and for a while this supplied my meat (until I caught the neighbors nosy pomeranian - oops!). In a city a hutch could easily do the same.

We are not connected to town water, an have drought 'proofed' ourselves with two 4500 litre tanks plus a small dam.

I would never have believed how little effort this would all take.

However, throughout cities and towns of southern Australia, the decade of drought has had a devastating impact on home gardening. Increasing water restrictions have progressed from limits on watering times, through to bans on watering gardens using hoses, through to outright bans on the use of reticulated water in gardens. Not only household gardens, but city parks and street-scapes have been let die.

The ironic thing is that you can still legally have a 30 minute shower while you can not hose your pumpkin patch. There have been constant calls for shifts to systems that limit metered use rather than usage practises. But the politicians keep saying it is too hard to do.

In the mean-time, the loss of gardens is severely impacting on the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. Especially those who relied on gardens to supplement meager incomes - in particular a large proportion of retirees who not only fed themselves friends and family, and saved money this way, but also kept fit and active in their twilight years through gardening.

Green's Company


Here's something I want a Green entreprenuer to do for me.

I would do it myself except I have zero expertise in real estate management (and finance, and ...)

Form a company to build Green Apartment Complexes.

So, instead of a person having to deal with installing solar panels and building their own garden, you simply rent an apartment and all the stuff is there for you.

Would it be more expensive than a regular apartment?   Sure, but you would trade increased rent to cover the capital costs of panels in exchange for zero or low cost monthly energy bills.   You would trade increased rent in exchange for getting a piece of earth in the community garden, where the Apartment Managers could hire a "local farmer" to tend your crops for you while you go out and earn money programming databases...or barista-ing cappuccinos.

People are shelling out $2000 per month for houses that make them unhappy and are disconnected from community.   How about paying $1500 for the basic apartment (which would be the size of what you could get now) and using the other $500 towards making the apartment complex greener by having it re-invested in the things we mentioned.  

Would the person feel he's wasted that $500 if he moves?

Well, yes and no.  The technology is evolving so rapidly at this point, that we will probably be building, and rebuilding year after year.   There will always be better solar cells, better wind, better fuel cells.   So, by going with the rental model, instead of the homeowner model, the individual family could keep improving its access to green technology instead of being stuck with 2008 era solar cells in 2013.

Possibly the best Alternative Energy blog I read: New Energy and Fuel

Green apartments...

Form a company to build Green Apartment Complexes.

There are some green apartment complexes ou there, that do use solar and other advanced green technologies.  And I do know that there are some companies that specialze in their construction...

...but I don't know of any large-scale companies that specialize in management.  Usually it's just a small one-time thing, or an eco-village concept.

It would be interestin' to have companies like though.

Now If Only They Built It In Kent

This is what few of us can afford, but all of us should have...an apartment in The Solaire:

http://www.thesolaire.com/


Energy
  •     Energy conserving building design is 35% more energy-efficient than code requires, resulting in a 67% lower electricity demand during peak hours.
  •     Lower electric bills for residents.
  •     Photovoltaic panels convert sunlight to electricity.
  •     Computerized building management system and environmentally responsible operating and maintenance practices.

Meanwhile, in the boondocks, this guy is asking my question:

http://gregable.com/2007/09/apartment-solar-what-is.html

See, the '?' is a the piece that takes the green power from my solar panel on my balcony (DC, variable current) and supplements it with the brown power from my wall outlet (AC, constant current) and outputs constant AC current to my refrigerator...


Possibly the best Alternative Energy blog I read: New Energy and Fuel
1 x 10

I have a 1x10 foot home garden where I am growing lettuce, tomato, bell pepper, rosemary, and lavender, with room to spare.

local ecology | http://localecology.org
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks