Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

The upside of disinformation: unintentional humor

Manhattan Declaration disses IPCC, Gore, any attempts to reduce CO2

Posted by Joseph Romm (Guest Contributor) at 8:57 PM on 06 Mar 2008

Okay, so at the recent Heartless Heartland skeptic/denier/disinformer/climate-destroyer conference (I promise to propose a better term this week!), one of the few attendees who was a non-non-believer in science emailed me the following:

Marc Morano, Sen. Inhofe's press secretary, just cited your post on the dangers of consensus as an example of how deniers are forcing climate action proponents to retreat. "We're making them afraid of using the term 'consensus'!"

Now, that is humor! After all, my article is titled "The cold truth about climate change: Deniers say there's no consensus about global warming. Well, there's not. There's well-tested science and real-world observations [that are much more worrisome]," and it explains that:

  1. "Consensus" is far too weak a word to describe the collective scientific understanding of the dangers of human-caused global warming.
  2. The reality of climate change is almost certainly going to be much worse than the "consensus" as that term is normally used (to describe the IPCC reports).
  3. The deniers are peddling pseudoscience.

I confess that RealClimate's Gavin Schmidt did warn me that the disinformers might do this, and I was skeptical they would contemplate such Orwellian rhetoric (I am a skeptic at heart). Silly me. Sillier Morano. Silliest Inhofe.

As the WSJ environmental blog noted, the Heartland disinformer conference ended with more unintentional humor -- a "Manhattan Declaration" whose first recommendation said this:

Now, therefore, we recommend: That world leaders reject the views expressed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as well as popular but misguided works such as An Inconvenient Truth.

The WSJ thinks it's funny they would start with an attack on Gore -- and it is. But I think what's even funnier is that the disinformers urged world leaders to reject the IPCC, even though the leaders' representatives already signed off on a line-by-line edit/review of all the IPCC summaries.

The second recommendation is much less funny:

That all taxes, regulations, and other interventions intended to reduce emissions of CO2 be abandoned forthwith.

Wait, that sounds strangely familiar ... My Dante is a bit rusty, but I believe it was ... La Divina Commedia ... yes, now it's coming to me ... Canto III.9:

Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate.

My medieval Tuscan is even rustier, but I think the line translates something like this:

Abandon hope all ye who enter here.

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

The Shot Heard Round The World


The Manhattan Declaration States:

"...that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method"

Texeme.Construct(function(x)=Participation(x))

better term for the conference

laggards. From the rogers model for the adoption and  diffusion of innovation.

babylon children have lost their way

weak hearts nah go through.

rip crush burn and stab all wicked and evil babylonians who hide the truth
you fools

don't you see; if it weren't for this global warming nonsense, fossil fuels would provide clean cheap power forever, happily supplied to us by countries where the citizens want nothing more than to provide us with their one and only resource at bargain basement prices, because they love us and admire our way of life! you're standing in the way of this utopia!

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks