Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors
Gristmill

Urgency and solvability: The "we" campaign

Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection unveils ambitious $300 million ad campaign

Posted by David Roberts at 11:44 AM on 31 Mar 2008

If you read Juliet Eilperin's great rundown in the Washington Post, you know that today marks the launch of a massive PR effort from Al Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection.

Gore has concluded that U.S. politicians will continue to be timid on climate change until the public demands otherwise. "The simple algorithm is this: It's important to change the light bulbs, but it's much more important to change the laws," he said. "The options available to civilization worldwide to avert this terribly destructive pattern are beginning to slip away from us. The path for recovery runs right through Washington, D.C."

We Campaign To that end, the Alliance is launching the "we" campaign, a $300 million, 3-year campaign to shift public opinion and create a sense of urgency commensurate with the problem, along with a sense of "solvability" -- that is, a sense that we can beat it. The campaign's goals are audacious: mobilizing 10 million volunteers through TV ads, print ads, and social networks.

Gore has famously put his money where his mouth is, putting all profits from An Inconvenient Truth, his salary from Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers, and the cash from all the awards he's won toward the ACP campaign. Private donors will pony up the rest.

Cathy Zoi, CEO of the ACP (and leader of a similar effort which led to the political flip in Australia recently), spoke with a small group of bloggers today about the details and thinking behind the campaign.

Their research has found that there's only about 18% of people in the U.S. who are opposed to climate change action on ideological grounds (Romm's "deniers and delayers"). That leaves over 80% reachable. Around 9-10% are activists, people who get it and are engaged. Around 35% are taking some small actions, though their understanding is shaky. The rest are what Zoi called "fearful and confused" -- they don't really get what global warming is, what causes it, or how to address it, but they're acutely aware that it's a huge problem and it stresses them out.

The ACP will keep measuring the public on this. Their ambitious target is to move the needle -- they want 70% of the public to get the "urgency and solvability" of the problem and make it a top-three voting issue.

The campaign will involve three key pieces:

The first, which rolled out today, is the invitation. Here's the ad, called "anthem," narrated by William H. Macy:

The second phase is about eliminating partisanship from the climate question. The ads will feature "unlikely alliances" like Pat Robertson with Al Sharpton and Nancy Pelosi with Newt Gingrich.

The third piece is online mobilization -- 20-25% of the ACP's money will go to interactive online advertising and social networking. There will also be individual alliances with community-based groups: unions, the Girl Scouts, faith communities, etc. The website will be geared to offer different messages and routes to involvement for different groups.

I had three questions for Zoi.

First, would the ACP be recommending particular policies or legislation? She said the initial focus is simply on bringing people up to speed, but eventually there would be more of a policy push. (She mentioned that in Australia, the public's understanding increased faster than they expected and they were able to turn to policy and politics in time to affect the election, but she didn't know if the same would hold true in the U.S.) In particular she mentioned a moratorium on new coal plants without CCS, a large boost in funding for renewables, and, of course, a mandatory cap on carbon.

Secondly, I asked if the framing would remain Problem-Solution, or whether the messaging would shift to focus on the enormous economic opportunity that may be passing us by. She said Yes (enthusiastically) and noted that the campaign would move in that direction in the third phase, after the partisanship component. She said the economic angle could be an even bigger asset given the current economic troubles in the U.S.

Third, I asked when, if ever, they were going to ask someone from the business community or the Republican party to publicly shame the coal industry for it's well-funded efforts to slow action on climate change. She said people don't really understand the whole coal and "clean" coal component yet. But, I said, people understand corporate efforts to thwart environmental progress, right?

At this point both she and Gore aide Kalee Kreider, also on the call, were audibly squirming. Obviously there was something they wanted to tell me about, but couldn't yet. They said there was "something in the works," but they had to wait until it was farther along to announce it. They said the ACP would not only be running its own ads but would be "supporting efforts from other players." The "hint, hint" was implied. Guess we'll have to wait a bit to find out what this is, but it sounds promising.

Anyway, this will be fascinating to watch and I'll be updating you folks regularly. Stay tuned.

If they want to be "bipartisan"...

...they're not going to be able to shame the coal industry.  In fact, I'm not sure how much they'll really be able to do in the solutions area -- are they talking about any particular cap-and-whatever?  cap-and-auction? any particular bill?  I'm sure you'll get the inside scoop.

That is supposed to be a "w"?

Pathetic graphics.  We can do much, much better.

Plus, as I have written before, the color green is tricky.  It is not a friendly color.  You need to work hard to get the right shade.  And that lemon-lime shade on the sad upside-down-m button might only work if margaritas are being passed around.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

He's got that right

"Gore has concluded that U.S. politicians will continue to be timid on climate change until the public demands otherwise."

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Oh right

Well, if it is a question of content, not style, I gladly team up, as usual, with BioD.

So long as our retinue jackets do not have to be that Jello-green color.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

Oh my god, look at we, or is it me?

I like the logo and the Kermit green.

I have problems with the top-down message.  Albeit hero worship is good for talk.  But the rich and famous have clean hands.  They lack the frontline experiences and the hard work of implementing solutions.  The US is importing solutions from Europe, Australia, Asia, but not supporting homegrown solutions that would supply energy less expensively and with benefits of massive local employment.  US cultural and financial capital is missing, or worse.  I could do so much with a handful of seeds.  Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers told me they do not have seeds.  So we continue to work with volunteers needing medical insurance while burdened with student loans.

Those implementing solutions remain frustrated and marginalized, more so now with the visibility of $300MM just beyond our reach.

They need to distribute the Oreskes talk

"The American Denial of Global Warming" needs to be shown, frequently, on every community access television station in the country.
(This will probably entail re-recording the talk, when she gives it again in future)

Up With People!


300 million bucks.

That should prop up GOOG's stock price for a week or two...

Possibly the best Alternative Energy blog I read: New Energy and Fuel

It's a non-profit organization, ya nitwit...



"I like the logo"

Sheeez, these kids today ... !

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Wake me up....

when somebody with some real clout shows that they think this is urgent. The US advertising market is how many billions of dollars yearly? Almost all of what is advertised would have to be set aside should serious action to mitigate global warming be taken.

Face it; we're waiting for the die-off to really bite us hard before we take any action. Even in Australia, the near total collapse of their agricultural sector hasn't convinced them that exporting coal might be a bad idea.

This is like showing up to a wind-driven wildfire with a tube of sunscreen and a squirtgun. It won't work and it's not designed to.

Go! Lemmings, Go!!

Put the Carbon Back

vision is a curse, Pangolin

but at least it's a living

ACP : does it have specific proposals?

Haven't we had enough of groups calling for action without saying what they want done? How long will Gore's ACP keep us in suspense about its proposals? Will it say BAN COAL? Will it say carbon trading is a scam? Will it actively oppose fossil fuel subsidies and tax breaks? We are holding our breath but we have to let out the CO2 sometime. There is nothing wrong with an ad campaign but the public has to have something to DO after it has been activated. Hey Al, please give us a clue. Hope your plan is truly "commensurate" with the risk rather than something to appease and calm down the Business as Usual people and those in congress who passed the really flabby energy bill.

The honest oracle

always dies in poverty. Nobody wants to hear the whole truth or any larg portion thereof.

Put the Carbon Back
Monbiot

Pango, George Monbiot's website has a nice version of that: "Tell people something they already know and they will thank you; tell them something new and they will hate you."

Save your community: Cut greenhouse gas emissions 5% per year.
Before much longer coal must be banned.

Nothing else will make enough of a difference.  We need (or is it now, "'we' needs"?) to make it known that the price of curing global warming is this: $0.20 per kiloWatt-hour for electricity from nuclear, wind and Solar sources; and $5 per gallon for artificial vehicle fuels, free of fossil carbon, manufactured from air and water.

As for heavy hitters, the insurance companies have now recognized that the effects of global warming will hurt them very badly.  They can be powerful and influential allies in the fight.  

That logo again!

They actually paid a top-drawer graphic designer to come up with it!  : )

http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/04/06/weekinreview ...

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

That logo

The attention which that little quirk is attracting from intelligent commentators is probably indication that the 'top-drawer designer' earned his/her fee.

The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks