Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Driving in circles

A fun traffic simulator and lessons learned

Posted by Clark Williams-Derry (Guest Contributor) at 2:00 PM on 11 Mar 2008

Read more about: cars | urban planning

Via Brad Plumer: a traffic jam in in a bottle.

To me, it's pretty remarkable how closely the real-world experiment above matches up with this java-based computer traffic simulator.

Warning: if you click the last link, and you're at all geeky, prepare to lose your afternoon!

A few years back I wasted hour after hour playing with the java settings, and watching "traffic" jams materialize and melt -- just like in real life. My favorite quirk: for one lane-narrowing scenario, I could make traffic flow along beautifully at 40 miles per hour, but seize up like glue at either 20 mph or 60 mph. Another fave (and very relevant to congestion pricing debates) was letting traffic flow along smoothly at, say 1,400 "cars" per hour, and then increasing traffic volumes to 1,500 -- and watching the traffic jam crystallize within moments.

Obviously, a java-based traffic simulator, or even a controlled experiment like the one in the video above, can't perfectly replicate real driving. But it's interesting to consider how sensitive traffic flow is to subtle changes. A seemingly negligible increase in traffic volumes, a tiny obstacle, a driver's hesitation: any of those can precipitate a phase change, turning free-flowing traffic into viscous muck. But conversely, a seemingly intractable traffic mess can free itself -- if you remove an obstacle, smooth out a choke point, or simply reduce the peak traffic volume.

Depneds on driver behavior.

  The real issue when dealing with any "instability" is not the cause of the initial perturbation, but rather the dynamics which cause a tiny perturbation to grow exponentially. In these sorts of traffic situations it is driver behavior, which looks insufficiently far ahead, and accelerates over enthusiastically. With such behavior these "shockwaves" [I hate that term density wave would be more appropriate] grow in amplitude. With a few drivers who are able to substantially anticipate the coming wave, and slow slightly before it reaches them, many of these waves can be damped out. Perhaps only a few percent of "good" drivers would be needed to reduce these phenomena.

   Another interesting thing I've noticed on my commute. These density waves have a propensity for getting stuck on certain parts of the roadway -usually a curve. Apparently the driver perception/behavior is sufficiently modified by these slight differences in perception, that certain places end up capturing the slowest part of the wave(s).

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks