Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

'You should shudder a little bit ...'

According to Bush adviser, Bush actually serious about mandatory climate controls

Posted by Sean Casten (Guest Contributor) at 9:25 AM on 07 Feb 2008

This ($ub req'd) just in from Captain Environmental Compassion, Bush adviser James Connaughton: Bush is serious about climate change. Seriously!

Surprised? Read on, for excerpts from this newsflash ...

Their text in blocks below. My helpful translation follows.

Despite its lack of support for a price on carbon, the Bush Administration isn't opposed to mandatory emissions cuts, said the Chairman of the Bush Administration's House Council on Environmental Quality, James Connaughton.

Smells like an about face?

The administration sees a need to help foster innovation and investment needed to get the job done -- which is often ignored in some circles, he added at the US Department of Commerce's "Powering Our Low Carbon Future" conference in Washington, DC yesterday.

Hmm ... smells like there might be some corporate pork a-comin'.

This next year will be the most consequential ever for getting a climate change control system done internationally since this is when countries will roll up their sleeves and figure out how to actually do it.

Connaughton and his boss will work with other countries to bring down tariffs to help clean energy technology move around the world more freely.

Translation: I'll clean up my act if you clean up yours, but don't expect me to lead.

The Administration is also pushing a clean tech fund to which the US will contribute $2 billion over the next three-years and will seek contributions from other large economies to help foster development.

Knew I smelled it coming!

What Connaughton called the Bush Administration's pushes for mandatory action included the new Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, appliance efficiency standards and incandescent light bulb phase outs -- all passed by the Democratic Congress last year.

Yeah, those were good times. Back when the Democratic Congress insisted on lowering CAFE standards and stopping efficiency and they were finally saved in that 11th hour wrangling session when the president's leadership expended his political capital, safe in the knowledge that with no upcoming election, he could focus on his lasting legacy as Mr. Mandatory Climate Action. Someday, I'll show that video to my grandkids as they play in their glaciers and remind them that but for that bit of courage, our planet would have burned. Thank you, Mr. Bush. Oh, thank you!

And the chairman cited state renewable portfolio standards as evidence the Bush Administration wasn't opposed to mandates.

Translation: "You want crazy quotes? I'll show you crazy quotes." Presumably, the White House also gets credit for the mandatory caps in Europe, where they have comparable jurisdiction to the state RPS regs.

"Everyone talks about pricing carbon. We're talking about several hundred billion dollars in compliance costs," said Connaughton.

"You should shudder at that a little bit. But these are carefully tailored programs to ensure that that money is buying real technology produced by Americans for use by Americans."

It is certainly shudder-worthy ...

Business as usual

They fight as hard as they can to prevent progressive action.

And when it actually happens, then they take all the credit for it.

-David Ahlport

Over complication

Leads to confusion.  Confusion opens up the playing field to corruption.

Just give a subsidy of 10 cents per kwh to renewable electricity and conservation.  Pay for that subsidy with cash withdrawn from tax breaks for oil and energy companies experiencing record profits.

Keep it simple.  Put it right in the face of lobbyists.  

Don't pander to corporate trading by putting a price on carbon.  Give the 10 cents per kwh right to the homeowner with the solar panel or the farmer with a wind machine or manure/biogas power plant.

Put that money right into the local economy.  There's a stimulus.  Don't stimulate more hedge fund thievery.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin

What I shudder at is the audacity

"Everyone talks about pricing carbon. We're talking about several hundred billion dollars in compliance costs," said Connaughton.

Oh, you mean about as much as the war with Iraq has cost us?  Or about enough to buy 400 days worth of crude oil for the entire US? Or enough... One Day = $720 Million

I'd rather walk out of the mall with Carbon Compliance than a War with Iraq for several hundred billion dollars.

Morganmghee

The war in Iraq is not an optional or discretionary cost as you are characterizing it. To say that we chose to fight a war, spend billions of dollars, and lose thousands of American lives when we could have directed the effort at carbon compliance is not true.

You would rather walk out of the mall and be carbon compliant that live in a country sponsoring the war in Iraq. What you fail to realize is that you are walking out of the mall without fear of becoming a pink mist in a terrorist plot, i.e. Israel, Bali, Spain, Beslan. Like Bush or not, we have not had a terrorist attack in this country since 9-11.

Stay positive, love your life.

Except that

Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJiNtpIpD6k

You can easily make that argument about Afghanistan.
But Iraq was a war of choice.
And staying in Iraq for 4 years is a choice.

And a damned expensive one at that.
http://greyfalcon.net/iraqvsenergy.png


-David Ahlport

"No terrorist attack"

Unless you notice the terrorists running the government, who have disgraced themselves violating their oaths to preserve the Constitution against all enemies.

Or even if you can pull your head out long enough to remember the anthrax mailings that killed, if I recall correctly, several people and essentially shut down Congress for some weeks.

The 5% Project

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks