Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Hillary's poisonous NH cloud

Clinton lobbied for tire burning near Granite State

Posted by Glenn Hurowitz (Guest Contributor) at 10:02 AM on 07 Jan 2008

With the New Hampshire primaries approaching, I thought I'd share this article about how Hillary Clinton's political style has directly affected New Hampshire voters in a way that might shed light on the kind of president she would be. The article was co-written with Friends of the Earth Action president Brent Blackwelder.

-----

New Hampshire has for decades struggled to keep its air clean. But during 2005 and 2006, Hillary Clinton's ambitions collided with New Hampshire's air quality, putting thousands of Granite Staters, and particularly children, directly in the line of a deadly cloud of toxic pollution.

At the time, of course, Clinton was hotly engaged in a campaign to increase her margin of victory in her bid for reelection in her New York Senate race. Her triumph was never in question: she faced only token Republican opposition in a heavily Democratic state. But she was desperate to prove that she could win with a big margin in more conservative areas of upstate New York so she could prove to Democrats that she would be viable in similar conservative areas around the country during her presidential bid.

That understandable political aspiration came head to head with New Hampshire children's health in 2005, when the International Paper logging company unveiled a proposal to burn tires at its Ticonderoga paper mill in upstate New York on the border with Vermont. Burning tires to power its operations would save IP money on its electricity bills, but it came with a heavy price.

Burning tires produces (PDF) massive quantities of mercury, benzene, and other cancer-causing poisons, and prevailing winds would carry those poisons into Vermont, New Hampshire, and the rest of New England. At the time, doctors and public health officials warned that even a very limited tire burn could cause permanent damage to New Englanders' health, especially that of children, whose developing bodies are especially vulnerable to exposure to toxic chemicals. According to the American Lung Association, exposure to burning tires can cut years off someone's life.

The dangers were so bad that Vermont's Republican governor, Jim Douglas, took up the cause and launched lawsuits and an extended public campaign to persuade New York not to expose the residents of his state to these deadly risks.

Normally, it's likely that Vermont's efforts along with those of New York environmentalists would succeed in stopping such an outrageous plan. But IP had an ace up its sleeve in Hillary Clinton. The logging company's strategists knew that Clinton would do almost anything to win votes in upstate New York and so they resorted to an old polluter trick: they threatened to close down the plant and fire the workers if they weren't allowed to burn the tires.

It was the kind of absurd claim that Clinton had been exposed to hundreds of time in her political career, and she knew better. But even though she had put defending children's welfare at the core of her political identity, even serving as chair of the Children's Defense Fund, she was willing to sacrifice that value on the altar of her political ambition.

Clinton could have just stayed silent -- the permit to allow the tire burn was a state issue. But she went out of her way to help the logging company, actively lobbying (PDF) the state government to allow the tire burn to go ahead. With Clinton's influence behind them, the logging company had the bipartisan support it needed and New York State approved a two-week test tire burn, as a prelude to a permanent permit.

The test, however, was a disaster. The worst fears of environmentalists were realized as the pollution from the burn vastly exceeded even International Paper's extremely lax pollution permit -- exposing thousands of New Hampshire children to poisonous chemicals. Public outrage forced New York to shut down the test after just three days.

IP, of course, didn't shut down the plant and didn't lay off any workers (indeed, this December, they completed an $11-million upgrade at the facility and are planning on adding 12 new jobs at the plant).

But the episode did show that Hillary Clinton is willing to sacrifice even her most cherished value -- children's welfare -- when she sees even the smallest political advantage in doing so.

scrap tire brouhaha

Perhaps Hillary got some real bad from her advisers? In the early stages of the game, many states had a huge glut of waste tires, many dumped in illegal landfills where they could (1) breed mosquitoes and spread disease and/or (2) catch on fire, in spectacular events that took weeks to extinguish. Thus from the beginning, many states wanted to find ways to recycle, burn, or somehow get rid of a few million tons of scrap tires.  

And industry was willing to oblige.

The unanticipated problem was that scrap tires are difficult to burn in a power boiler that uses coal, oil, natural gas, wood products, and so forth. The emissions, so far as I know, where never a big issue, although I'm glad that became one. But the main engineering problem was that most tires these days have woven steel belts in them.

The woven steel belts in the tires made it very difficult to split and crumb the tires very quickly, and engineers became alarmed that a big fraction of steel could get into the power boiler. They were right. The steel was clogging the slag and ash outlet on the boiler bottoms, a condition that if maintained for a while could blow up the entire unit (I am not kidding).  

So industry said "no thanks."  

Needless to say, there was a lot of eggs left on many faces, and not just Hillary's either ... nothing compared to what her husband did with his lawyering of hazardous waste dumps in Arkansas, I mean, come on get real.

Onward through the fog

Wrong -- she supported only the TEST

This article deeply troubled me until I looked further.  When I read the letter which the supposedly demonstrates Clinton's willingness to "sacrifice" children on the altar of her "desperate" "ambition," I found only her support for a two-week TEST, NOT for final approval.

Bloomberg.com reports a statement from her office that she "takes seriously the outstanding questions about the environmental impacts, and believes that the two-week test will provide the information needed to answer those questions."

She was right... it did.  The test failed, and from what I can tell she appropriately dropped her support given the evidence.  I supect that one failed test will do far more to halt tireburning plans around the nation than all the efforts to prevent the test.

Action based on evidence -- makes sense to me.  Isn't that we want Americans to do in the face of global warming?  Obama has done far greater damage with his support of the horrendous 2005 energy bill, which Clinton opposed.  The real poison here is in the hyperbole of this article.

Tests

Don't we all wish tests were just preludes?  I would love to call up Harvard and let them know that I'm taking the LSAT as a prelude to entrance to their law school.

Unfortunately, they are not, which makes this article sound sadly like a failed campaign smear.

Smear

Yep, carefully crafted.  Imagine the eventual candidate facing these tactics in the general election.

Are copies of articles like this being stuck under windshield wipers in NH?  By Clinton haters.  It wouldn't be surprising.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks