Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors
Gristmill

DeSmogBlog owes Obama three apologies

Obama is in no way 'George Bush Lite'

Posted by Joseph Romm (Guest Contributor) at 3:04 PM on 06 Jan 2008

desmog.gifI am a big fan of the climate website, DeSmogBlog. So I was shocked when, the day after his unprecedented victory in Iowa, DeSmogBlog gave Barack Obama "the inaugural 2007 SmogMaker Award for blowing smoke on global warming."

Gimme a break. How could anyone win that award any year -- let alone in its inaugural year -- when George W. Bush is still president? [Not to mention a year in which Lomborg and Inhofe continue their influential disinformation compaigns!]

After all, the "Prize honors those who sow confusion and delay on Climate Change." Seriously. Bush is easily the confuser and delayer of the year ... and the decade ... and he surely will be on the short list for the entire century. Yet DeSmog says Obama is "looking like George Bush lite." How can they make that claim? By misreading -- or failing to read -- Obama's terrific climate plan. DeSmogBlog claims:

But he is campaigning on a greenhouse gas reduction "target" that the U.S. won't have to meet for 42 years ...

While the world's leading scientific bodies tell us we need to act immediately to avoid catastrophic climate disruption, Obama has set his own target date at 2050, long past any opportunity for voters to hold him accountable.

Uh, no. In fact, his plan (PDF) explicitly states:

Obama will start reducing emissions immediately in his administration by establishing strong annual reduction targets, and he'll also implement a mandate of reducing emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

Based on the links in their post, DeSmogBlog's research on Obama's climate apparently consists of reading a one-paragraph story on BusinessWire with Obama's statement on Bali -- which they link to not once, but twice! They claim he is an unrepentant coal supporter, based on a June 2007 Washington Post article about his support for his state's coal industry. And yet in his climate plan he bluntly commits:

Obama will use whatever policy tools are necessary, including standards that ban new traditional coal facilities, to ensure that we move quickly to commercialize and deploy low carbon coal technology. Obama's stringent cap on carbon will also make it uneconomic to site traditional coal facilities and discourage the use of existing inefficient coal facilities.

I defy DeSmogBlog to tell me which serious U.S. politician has a climate plan substantially tougher or more comprehensive than Obama's. It is a courageous plan for any presidential candidate to run on. Now let's compare that to Bush's record. As I've written:

Thanks to the misleadership of our President, the world took no action at Bali to reduce emissions, we had a sham international "climate summit," the country continues to take no national action on greenhouse gas emissions, Congress was forced to drop almost all non-oil-related provisions to cut GHGs from the energy bill, the EPA blocked California and other major states from regulating tailpipe GHGs on their own, the Administration keeps muzzling climate scientists, and it keeps misallocating scarce clean tech dollars to hydrogen fuel cell vehicle research at the expense of real and timely solutions like energy efficiency and renewables -- and that's just the stuff we know about for sure!

... Our person of the year ... President George W. Bush doesn't just fiddle while the planet burns, he actively fans the flames and thwarts the fire-fighters.

DeSmogBlog owes Obama three apologies, for:

  1. Giving him this undeserved "award."
  2. Failing to read his climate plan and then mischaracterizing it (twice).
  3. Saying Obama is "looking like George Bush lite."

For completeness's sake, the second unacceptable misstatement about the Obama plan they make is:

... he has continued to promote the current administration's plan to circumvent the Kyoto Protocol, the only international climate agreement currently in place ...

His short-term strategy is the same as President Bush's; Obama wants to create a new Global Energy Forum that doesn't include the cleanest and most progressive (European) economies.

Not even close. He has promised to re-engage with the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC):

The UNFCCC process is the main international forum dedicated to addressing the climate problem and an Obama administration will work constructively within it.

But what about the Global Energy Forum? Obama says:

President Bush recently invited world leaders of the 15 largest emitters of greenhouse gases to a two-day conference, yet he failed to show up with any binding domestic commitments or funding for international efforts to combat climate change. Not surprisingly, these world leaders criticized the U.S. commitment to climate change and we missed an opportunity to join other countries with a serious plan to tackle this challenge.

Barack Obama will take seriously the U.S.'s leadership role in combating climate change. Obama will signal to the world the U.S. commitment to climate change leadership by implementing an aggressive domestic cap-and-trade program coupled with increased investments in clean energy development and deployment. Obama will build on our domestic commitments by creating a negotiating process that involves a smaller number of countries than the nearly 200 countries in the current Kyoto system. Obama will create a Global Energy Forum -- based on the G8+5, which included all G-8 members plus Brazil, China, India, Mexico and South Africa -- of the world's largest emitters to focus exclusively on global energy and environmental issues.

But DeSmogBlog says the Obama Forum "doesn't include the cleanest and most progressive (European) economies." What the heck are the G8 countries? What the heck are France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom?

We need a smaller forum than the UNFCCC to jumpstart the crucial deal, which is really between the U.S. and China, but the other major emitters need to be part of that process. Obama makes clear that:

This Global Energy Forum will complement -- and ultimately merge with -- the much larger negotiation process underway at the UN to develop a post-Kyoto framework.

Obama deserves praise for his courageous plan. And he deserves three apologies from DeSmogBlog.

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Thanks,

for saying what needed to be said about this idiotic move. It was clearly designed to get press and attention, but it's so silly and offbase that I doubt even gullible reporters will fall for it.

grist.org
Clinton supporter?

Maybe desmogblog is using the tried n true republican smear tactic of distorting the truth in an effort to damage Obama in order to give other candidates a boost....

Mike Johnston
Huh

When did Obama switch his energy policy over to this stance?  Wasn't he backing fuel farming, nuclear power, and clean coal before?

The Obama policy excerpts presented here seem to tout clean coal as well.  He opposes "traditional coal", a clever phrase that excepts "clean" coal. Has he change his stand on ethanol after Iowa?  Or nuclear power.

Every pub debate participant mentioned nuclear first in their response to energy policy questions.

Obama's energy policy apparently comes from industry lobbyists.  Goals for reduction aren't enough, the energy policy being examined must state specific technologies to get to those goals.

As with vague cap and trade policies, that even those who propose them do not understand, these reduction goals give politicians plenty of wiggle room to avoid real energy policy using real capital.

What if FDR had merely set goals for WW 2 war production or capped auto production and allowed a "free" market trading system to handle tank and bomber production numbers?    

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

Apology offered

DeSmogBlog Apologizes to Barack Obama

"While we would always hope for better, we must acknowledge that Obama's position is a stunning improvement over the current standard and a clear notch up from the other serious contenders. We would like to apologize - to withdraw the award - and to wish him the best in continuing to refine and improve his position."

a sibilant intake of breath

Stuck

Are we stuck with Obama now?

Does anybody else feel a hint of dread?  The same dread of the 2004 election.  Huckabee could actually beat Obama on the strength of electoral corruption using racism as an excuse.

Will democratic party lawyers actually fight the Huckabee appointment this time?  Or leave it to a third party to try to object to voting irregularities as with Ohio in 2004?

Will the vore scamming expand to all the southern states this time around, instead of only Florida or Ohio?  it's a good bet.  Voting machines will be moved out of heavily democratic precincts to lengthen lines for voting.  in ohio there were 6 hour lines to vote.

We could have another bush, named huckabee.  And four more years of christian jihad for oil.  And four more after that as war with Iran and/or Venezuala gets going.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks