Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Mittster attacks McCain on climate

Could Romney's climate contrarianism come back to bite him in the general?

Posted by David Roberts at 11:04 PM on 27 Jan 2008

It's becoming increasingly clear that the Republican race is down to McCain and Romney, and they are rapidly escalating their attacks on one another.

Romney is now using McCain's climate legislation against him:

In a new line of attack, Romney then tore into the McCain-Lieberman Climate Stewardship Act.

"Instead of seeing if there's a way of stimulating the economy, McCain-Lieberman would depress the economy," Romney said.

"His plan calls for a new financial burden to be placed on people who are purchasing gasoline, or for that matter, natural gas to heat their homes or to cook in their homes. The energy information agency has said that his plan would cost America 300,000 jobs. In addition, people would pay, they estimate, approximately 50 cents per gallon more for gasoline and 20 percent more for their gas utility bill. That would depress the economy just at a time when we’re trying to stimulate the economy."

The EIA analysis Romney's referring to is here.

Romney may get some distance out of this economic pandering in a Republican primary -- it won him Michigan -- but it could hurt him badly in the general. Not only is the public on board with mandatory climate caps, but so are several of the most popular and appealing Republicans outside of D.C., most notably Cali. governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Fla. governor Charlie Crist (who endorsed McCain the other day).

Cali will go Dem either way, obviously, but opposition -- or even tepid support -- from Crist could sway Florida, which is a big deal.

Pro CO2 Vote


This country is due for a surge in pro-CO2 support.

People are tied of the Liberal media bashing CO2 and want a fair voice in Congress for it's benificent effects.

And those benefits would be?



You know

I need to track down the guy who made that chart.

He was basically showing an R curve of "CO2 assimilation rates" of plant species.

Pretty much, the plants have greatly diminishing returns in increased growth when you add more CO2.

And we've already passed the inflection point.

-David Ahlport

In short

Increased Carbon dioxide isn't linearly related to increased plant growth.

-David Ahlport
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks