Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Eco-Farm: California dreaming

Notes on California's big sustainable-farming conference.

Posted by Tom Philpott at 4:30 AM on 28 Jan 2008

Read more about: food | agriculture | sustainable ag

Note: This is another in a series of posts from Eco-Farm, the annual conference held by the Ecological Farming Association of California. At Eco-Farm, some 1,400-1,500 organic farmers, Big Organic marketers, and sundry sustainable-ag enthusiasts pack into a rustic, beautiful seaside conference hall an hour-and-a-half south of San Francisco to talk farming amid the dunes.

Van Jones
Satan gave me a taco: Harvesting talent at Eco-Farm.
Photo: Bonnie Powell, Ethicurean

Eco-Farm is a bit like summer camp for sustainable-ag nerds. You wind up outdoors a lot, wandering from activity to activity, often pelted by rain. I loved it. No brain-sucking hotel conference hall, no day upon day of artificial light and processed air. Break-out sessions took place in scattered arts-and-crafts bungalows, linked by trails through the rolling dunes. The low roar in the background was not some infernal highway; rather, waves lashing up against a rocky shore.

What sort of people thronged this sea-side paradise? About what you'd expect. The gently aging front line of that first great wave of back-to-the-land farming zeal of the early '70s: Dudes with tremendous gray beards, some with matching beret-capped dreadlocks; sensibly shod ladies swathed in earth tones.

Young folks mixed among these wizened survivors, and lots of them: the new wave of microfarmers and food-justice and green activists, some of them as hippied-out as their elders, some with a more urban-hipster aesthetic, and others still sporting what I call "farm metro": Carhartt trousers and Blundstone boots. 

Judging from Eco-Farm's sponsor list, I assume there must have been some corporate types lurking among us, but I didn't encounter many personally.

For me, a new-wave east coast farmer (and former Texan), California -- particularly its northern half -- has long represented a kind of sustainable-ag mecca: the land of (raw, pastured) milk and honey. 

Here are some of my impressions from Eco-Farm.

  1. Small-scale sustainable agriculture has become a site of activism. I've attended several annual conferences of the Carolina Farm Stewardship Association -- North and South Carolina's version of Eco-Farm -- and have been impressed by the upswing in political energy around farming. But at Eco-Farm that energy seemed ratcheted up a notch.  Some sessions had the buzz of an anti-war rally -- young folks and elders plotting an assault on industrial food. And nametags revealed the presence of a veritable gaggle of sustainable-ag and food-justice NGOs. Speakers talked often of "the movement," and that rubric seemed fitting.
  2. And yet, sustainable-ag remains a passion limited largely to white, middle-class folks. Eco-Farm displayed a broad diversity of ages and sartorial styles. Ethnically, though, a kind of monoculture flourished. That fact was seldom mentioned; and only with a dose of self-flagellation. What was missing, though, was analysis. Why are so few non-whites drawn to small-scale farming? I never heard the question come up. Like the national food-justice movement, the California contingent has failed to open a broad and sustained conversation on food, class, and race. Indeed, the whole question was essentially relegated to a single informative session on urban farming. I think the vexations of food and class will have to be fully aired and addressed for the sustainable-food movement to move beyond niche status. But the lack of discussion at Eco-Farm doesn't mean there isn't plenty of powerful activism around food in low-income, minority-dominated areas  in California. In the next days, I plan to visit and post about San Francisco's Alemany Farm and Oakland's People's Grocery.
  3. Sustainable ag has become a vocation not unlike that of art. The hours are long, the pay sucks, and failures are commonplace. But the work also offers ample opportunity for creativity and vision, and triumphs are exhilarating. That description applies to the life of a musician; it also works for someone setting out to make a living from the land. (One difference: Musicians can at least dream of big bucks; farmers, not so much.) The insight is probably banal, but here goes: Since its first stirrings back in the days of Rodale in the 1950s, the alternative-farming life has always drawn people with lots of creative energy, which often bubbles into letters, music, painting, and other art forms. Eco-Farm offered plenty of confirmation for that observation -- particularly the  talent show. A young farmhand delivered an offbeat, weirdly affecting spoken-word bit about lonesome talks over beer with his scarecrow ladyfriend; an elder took a virtuoso turn on a pair of bongos; there was a soaring aria, and a sing-along farm song straight from 19th century New England. Two young fellows delivered a fabulously silly cabaret act; and the audience endured at least one earnest earth dance. My favorite bit was when two young urban farmers, pictured above, gave a spirited, and yes, talented, version of Beck's "Satan gave me a taco."

"sustainable ag," etc.

Just to let you know, dear Tom, I have been agonizing over your horrific misfortune to have been brutally dragooned by your employer to go spend a long long bitterly long weekend at Asilomar.  What unspeakable enslavement!  Poor poor Tom!  How you must be suffering!  My heart bleeds!

"Nice work if you can get it,
And you can get it if you try."  ; )

More generally, "sustainable" and "sustainability" are words that should be denounced whenever they appear in anyone's vocabulary, and should be denounced especially by environmentalists.

For, simply, they are lies.

What could "sustainable" mean, after all, other than, "of or pertaining to an activity which may be carried on indefinitely, the participant elements, factors and resources of which are inexhaustible."

Well, cari bambini, there is nothing within this physical limited universe like that.  True, hand washes hand, parts help parts, agents enable conditions for future agencies; but time is a spiral, and never returns to the same point.

There are at least three reasons why "sustainable" and "sustainability" should be deleted from environmentalist discourse and indeed vocabulary:

  1. Cosmological: "The Universe is expanding."  Brooklyn too, says Alvy Singer to Alvy Singer's mother.  We can never return to this point in time.  (We do not even perceive this point in time, really, given the limitations of our senses -- "in real time" is a fiction -- , but that is another subject.)

  2. Biological: "Life finds a way."  Well, sometimes.  But often.  Very often.  And that is enough.  Agricultural scientists are fools.

  3. Anthropological: "Humans are pigs."  Well, sometimes.  But that is enough, and more than enough.  It was enough to impress one ancient Middle-Eastern culture to decide that all humanity should be condemned, for humanity's representatives' gluttony, to mortality and hard labor, the guys sweating awfully over their ploughs, the girls groaning awfully in childbirth.

Anyway, I for one shall look askance at every future unironic use of "sustainable" and "sustainability" in Grist and Gristmill.  As elsewhere.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Art as life, as ecofarm

This is a perfect trend.  Art and organic farming.  Quality of life versus walmart.  Cheap throwaway products and poisonous food for expendable cheap labor, consumers, and cannon fodder.

Versus quality of life, everyday a peak experience, of creativity, always becoming.  Never a cog or a commodity in a corporate machine.

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

Diversity

sustainable-ag remains a passion limited largely to white, middle-class folks.

For one thing, sustainable ag is not the place to go if you are poor and want to move up the economic ladder. The jobs and opportunities have not been there, but I'll bet that they will be.

There are other related areas that are more diverse.
Gardening (e.g., Ethnic gardeners)
Food security
Agro-ecology (eg Miguel Altieri and practices for small farmers in 3rd world countries)
Farm workers

Bart
Energy Bulletin

sustainability

Time is relative/sustainabilty is relative. If you chop all the trees down you run out of firewood. If you manage the trees you have a sustainable resource. Please understand how sustainability is used before condemning the entire movement. I have a farm which I believe is sustainable for a long time and I'm going to bet on myself and my knowledge in the long-run.

"condemning the movement"?

No, that is not at all what I am doing.  The movement sounds swell.  What I strongly dislike is the deceptiveness of the name, or code-word, "sustainability."  It is a form of the denial of death.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Sustainable Growth

I'm not sure about "sustainability", but I will say that I do abhor the term "sustainable growth" for much the same reason.  There is no such thing as sustainable growth.  Any growth, if it continues long enough, will exhaust the capacity for further growth.  Maybe "non-parasitic growth" would be a better term.

minority farmers

that's interesting because at plenty of conferences I've been at with minority and immigrant farmers, it's often remarked about how the future of farming is with people of color. already, 15% of specialty crop farmers are minorities. it could just be (like many progressive movements) they are divorced and off the radar from their white counterparts and thus, they never get invited to these type of conferences. which is too bad. there are lots of minority farm groups out there they could invite.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks