Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

The trust factor

What qualities do we need in a president who will get things done?

Posted by Joseph Romm (Guest Contributor) at 4:19 PM on 23 Jan 2008

This post is by ClimateProgress guest blogger Bill Becker, executive director of the Presidential Climate Action Project.

-----

Change -- a perennial theme in presidential campaigns -- has taken on a more serious meaning this election season. Of all the promises being put forward by the presidential candidates, change may be the most frequent.

bush_desk"Change" usually is a word used by candidates who don't have much Washington experience, but want to package their inexperience as a virtue. But allegiance to "change" is far more important If we want to confront global warming, energy insecurity and peak oil over the next four to eight years -- not to mention Iraq, the deficit, health care costs, and several other messes the Bush administration is leaving to its successors -- change will be the name of the game. Big change, in fact.

There is wide acknowledgment that Americans need to come together to solve some of these problems. We need a uniter, not a divider, in the White House -- for real this time. We have enough common causes, certainly, around which we should rally. What we don't have is trust.

If you asked most Americans today what one word comes to mind when they think about the White House, "trust" probably would not be their answer. It's not good sport to take potshots at lame ducks, so I'll resist the temptation to rant. I'll just say that the presidency we've experienced in the past seven years (think Cheney energy plan, Plame, WMDs, censured science, fired attorneys, erased CIA videos, lost White House emails, etc.) has reinforced the perception that Washington is a culture not only of incompetence, but of flagrant and unabashed dishonesty. It has been a great seven years -- not only for Leno, Stewart, and Letterman, but also for the cynicism industry.

But cynicism will not get us through problems as urgent and intractable as global warming. If I were writing the talking points for the candidates, I would have them say this: The first item on the national agenda is not a change in policies; it's a change in our culture of leadership.

Barack Obama comes close to this theme when he talks about hope. Gary Hart, a colleague and elder statesman for whom I have a great respect, has endorsed Obama because he believes that something big is happening in this race, something is turning, and it's not just about race and gender. Perhaps it is the passing of the torch to a generation whose spirit is not scarred by the trauma of seeing some of the best and brightest leaders of our time assassinated -- something that should not happen anywhere, let alone in America.

The size and energy of Obama's crowds seem to indicate there's an appetite for hope -- not the place in Arkansas, but what Webster's defines as "trust, reliance ... promise for the future." We need a "hope platform" from the candidates, with specifics. For starters, I recommend this one from the introduction to the Presidential Climate Action Plan.

To take bold action, the next president will need the support of the American people, and that relationship begins during the campaign. To win their trust, the candidates should pledge allegiance to some old American values that will serve us well in our new challenges.

The candidates should promise a government as it should be: open (PDF), accountable, value-driven, forward-looking, principled, unifying, just, and inclusive. The new administration must reignite the nation's genius for innovation and its sense of moral obligation to the nation's future. It must bust barriers (PDF), invent incentives, set goals, and nurture the technologies and industries that are emerging to power a sustainable economy.

The president should cut red tape, practice the paradoxical principle of making government leaner to make it more effective, bring out the best in career civil servants by appointing America's best people to lead them, and keep the bureaucracy attentive to the nation's needs and nimble enough to respond.

The president must be the champion of equity and social justice, as well as the CEO's CEO. He or she must be uncommonly courageous, loyal to principle over politics, and committed to seeking wise counsel outside as well as inside the White House.

The president must have a strong spine and a good compass, thick skin, and sensitivity to the people. He or she must be the leader not only of those who vote, but of those who are disengaged, disenchanted or disenfranchised. He or she must guard the keys of government from special interests and make a commitment to breaking the grip of powerful lobbies that would hold the nation back.

The president must be bullish on the future and skilled behind the bully pulpit. He or she must be a patriot and a citizen of the world, unafraid to ask a lot of the American people and willing for the American people to ask a lot of the President. He or she must be an evangelist for a revival of the American spirit. If we are to remain a great, secure, and prosperous nation, this is the kind of leadership we need.

Call me old-fashioned. Call me a wishful thinker. Call me idealistic. But call me pragmatic, too. I don't see how we will deal deeply enough and quickly enough with climate change, oil addiction, and the other epochal issues of our day without leaders who deserve our trust, starting with the person in the world's most powerful job.

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Politicians should walk their talk

I am affraid that there will be a good number of politicians who talk big on the environment and then do nothing when they get into office.  The ones that maintain what you call the "trust factor" will be the ones that run a green campaign, I think.  

Our company has a program for politicians to offset the greenhouse gasses from their election campaign. Here is the press release: http://www.standardcarbon.com/press_release/campaignneutr ...


Hope, reality, and trust

We all hope. We all hope we don't have to sacrifice so much we will be uncomfortable. But that is hope.

What if the truth of reality is that that is exactly what we will have to do to solve our problems? Whoever speaks this truth will only be able to speak of hope for the very long run, not tomorrow.

Will the people trust such a person? Will they trust them enough to vote for them? Will they trust them enough to follow their lead?

This is the sorry state of affairs. People want someone to reinforce their hope (for themselves) even if in the long run it means devastation. Because, they won't, can't, believe that that is a possible outcome.

Who would know the speaker of reality and solutions if s/he were to speak up?  I suspect no one would. Who would trust someone who said you must stop buying junk and stop insisting on a raise? I doubt there is anyone. The vast majority of people are ready to put their trust in someone who projects their hopes. And reality may have nothing to do with it.

The irony of the human condition is that you  need to possess a little wisdom in order to recognize a great deal of wisdom. And you must accept that that wisdom doesn't always tell you what you want to hear. That is where trust comes in. Sometimes, hope is for something other than for your immediate desires.

It's worth thinking about.

George
http://www.questioneverything.typepad.com/


George Mobus, Associate Professor, Institute of Technology, University of Washington Tacoma, and Professional Student for Life

Hope

One of my heros wrote:
"Choosing hope means conscious risk; it means looking at the ideas that govern us."
and
" . . . no one can "justify" hope by proving something good and positive.  Hope is more verb than noun -- an action, not a stance.  It is movement.  It is jumping into the messiness of it all.  It is listening, learning, trying, stumbling; it is false starts and contradictory evidence."
 Frances Moore Lappe and Anna Lappe, Hope's Edge (New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam a member of Penguin Group USA Inc, 2003)

As far as trust goes, most of the front-runners have a proven track record on being untrust worthy.  While I hope we Americans can lead our government to address and overcome the many obstacles we face, I do not trust most of them to follow through left to their own devises and the influence of big corporations & lobbyists.

Paraphrasing Ms. Lappe, Democracy is NOT something done for us or to us.  Democracy demands action.  We must be engaged and involved.  Our best hope that politicians will do what's necessary and right is for us to constantly remind them through letters, actions, and votes what we need, want and demand.  Get involved to whatever degree you are able.

It's time to take back "OUR DEMOCARCY"

"We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Ghandi

Washinton Momument:

There is nothing in the capitol that can be built taller than the Washington monument, so until the brown smog or Co2 concentrations build down to that level nothing will be done. I can google earth over mountain top removals and hollow fills on Army Corps of Engineer Projects. Federal constructed, maintained flood control projects with the watershed being destroyed by strip mining. As long as the coal corporations can stack money as high as the Washington Monument the Co2 Atmosphere will have to come down to that level for any environmental effort in D.C. to be effective. The money in the freezers is being kept cool by electricity generated by the coal corporations. If you could ever get yourself a lobby as well healed as the energy corporations you might make some inroads on some of these issue's. It is just like a big national flea market up there, if you got the cold hard cash!

The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks