|
Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors
|
||||
How to diversify environmentalism?The movement's greatest challenge is its own lack of diversityPosted by Erik Hoffner (Guest Contributor) at 12:28 PM on 02 Jan 2008The following is a guest essay by Marcelo Bonta. Marcelo is founder and director of the Center for Diversity & the Environment and the Young Environmental Professionals of Color. He is also a senior fellow with the Environmental Leadership Program and a member of the advisory board of the Orion Grassroots Network. -----
Diversifying the environmental movement is one of the greatest challenges we face this century. Not only is it the right thing to do, but the movement needs to keep up with the rapidly changing demographics of the U.S. if it is to remain effective. Today, people of color in the U.S. amount to over 100 million people (about one third of the population), and by 2050, their numbers will more than double, growing to almost 220 million (over 50 percent of the population). People of color already constitute a majority of the population in California, New Mexico, Hawaii, and Texas. The political and social implications of an increasingly diverse population and nation are vast. Communities of color have a mounting influence on society and politics, including the distribution of public finances, the way cities develop and grow, and the strength and creation of environmental laws and policies. Diversifying is not only a great challenge but also a great opportunity. Can you imagine if the environmental movement was effective at engaging people of color and leveraging their substantial support and talents? Millions of new supporters would surely translate into more political victories for the environment, more public support, more members, a larger volunteer base, richer partnerships and more financial support. In other words, the movement would be potentially more successful and influential than it ever has been before. Furthermore, people of color support environmental issues at a higher level than their white counterparts. An exit poll for a 2002 California multibillion-dollar bond issue for open space protection revealed that 77 percent of African Americans, 74 percent of Latinos, 60 percent of Asians and 56 percent of Caucasians approved the measure. Another recent poll commissioned by The Nature Conservancy and Trust for Public Land showed that 77 percent of Latino voters (versus 65 percent of all voters) support a tax increase to protect water quality and open space. This news should be encouraging, right? Yes, to a certain degree, but it also highlights a serious problem that exists in the movement. The movement continues to struggle with diversity, whether it's in outreach, collaborations, hiring and retention practices, or other facets. Not many people of color work in the environmental movement. The Minority Environmental Leadership Development Initiative found that out of 158 environmental institutions, 33 percent of mainstream environmental organizations and 22 percent of government agencies had no people of color on staff. In another study, the Natural Resources Council of America found that people of color make up only 11 percent of the staff and 9 percent of the boards of member organizations. Although it is concerning to see this lack of involvement of people of color, these numbers are actually symptoms of a much deeper problem. They reflect the root cause of the movement's diversity crisis -- a homogeneous, unintentionally exclusive culture that pervades most environmental institutions. [For a more detailed layout of the movement's diversity-related problems see "Diversifying the American Environmental Movement" (PDF)] If we are to work on our diversity crisis, we will need to effectively tackle cultural change as well as a slew of other areas where we can diversify. Nothing short of a comprehensive strategy that will sufficiently address the diversity crisis and create sustainable and lasting change will do. A Strategy to Diversify Diversifying the movement is complex, and it will take a diversity of approaches to succeed. A comprehensive strategy for diversifying includes working on cultural change, outreach, partnerships and collaborations, recruitment, retention, leadership development, and the educational pipeline. [See "Diversifying the Conservation Movement" (PDF) for a detailed description of a comprehensive strategy]. We need to work on making the movement and our organizations attractive places to work for a diverse array of people, while also drawing out the environmental values of people of color -- especially to the point of pursuing an environmental career. In order for diversity efforts to succeed, it is absolutely crucial for leaders to view diversity as a top priority, and to commit resources (i.e., money and staff time) to the effort. Most importantly, we all need to commit to the cause to the point of taking action. Movement-wide, we must focus on four major areas in order to initiate effective change:
So What Can You Do? Most people that I talk to in the environmental movement agree that the lack of diversity is a problem, yet the amount of interest far outweighs the amount of action committed to the cause. Whatever the cause for apathy -- whether it's lack of time or resources, a fear of venturing into the unknown, or a passing of responsibility -- we need to get over it and start taking action. We, as a movement, have cornered ourselves into this predicament. Now we collectively need to solve it. It is imperative to begin diversifying our movement immediately and seek bold change. Simple steps from each and every one of us can take us a long way. Here is what you can do today to push forward on diversity issues:
Every situation is different and will require a unique strategy. For effective efforts, environmental entities need to conduct a diversity assessment and develop a diversity action strategy specific to their workplace. A number of organizations and consultants can point you in the right direction, such as the Kenian Group and DR Works. And the Center for Diversity & the Environment website provides information about efforts, organizations, people, research, and strategies that are diversifying the movement. As the nation continues to diversify, the environmental movement faces one of the greatest challenges of this century. Will we diversify so that we can be successful and relevant for generations to come, or will we ignore our diversity problem and continue to compartmentalize ourselves into a continually irrelevant and ineffective movement that only appeals to homogeneous elites? I don't think it's a choice anymore. Diversifying is essential to creating a healthy, influential, and sustainable movement. The environmental movement has overcome immense problems and has achieved great feats in the past. There is no reason why we can't be up to the task again. The first and most important step is to start taking action. So what do you plan on doing today? For more on this topic, read Diversity and the Future of the U.S. Environmental Movement and "Diversifying the Conservation Movement" (PDF) by Marcelo Bonta and Charles Jordan (published in the Land Trust Alliance's Special 25th Anniversary Issue: A Report on the Future of Land Conservation in America.)
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
|
sign in
Search Gristmill
Using Gristmill
Recent Comments
|
|||