Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Survey says ...

Two thirds of likely caucus voters in Iowa think conservation more important than coal

Posted by Sean Casten (Guest Contributor) at 1:51 PM on 02 Jan 2008

Iowa Interfaith Power & Light, the Iowa Farmers Union, and Plains Justice have just completed a survey (PDF) in advance of tomorrow's caucuses.

Short version: Iowans think that we've squandered chances to do something meaningful about energy, and that it's time we started to do so before building new coal plants.

The executive summary is below the fold, but it's worth having a look at the whole presentation.

A scientific, phone-based survey conducted by Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) on December 7-11, 2007, of a representative sample of 1,005 Iowa adults found the following:

  1. About two thirds of Iowans (65 percent) would support a "one-year-long statewide dialogue in Iowa involving state officials, citizens, unions and utility company regulators to help shape the energy future of Iowa during which current coal-fired power plant plans would be frozen to allow for the most comprehensive discussion." Majority support for a dialogue/freeze is found among Republicans (58 percent), Democrats (71 percent) and Independents (67 percent).Two thirds of the most likely caucus attendees support the concept, including 60 percent who will attend Republican caucuses and 71 percent who will attend Democratic caucuses.
  2. Nearly four out of five Iowans (79 percent) -- including 69 percent of Republicans, 86 percent of Democrats and 79 percent of Independents -- say that "Iowa should focus on increased (energy) conservation steps and more fuel efficiency to reduce demand for electricity before it constructs new coal-fired power plants." Supporters include 75 percent of the most likely caucus attendees, including 67 percent who will attend Republican caucuses and 88 percent who will attendee Democratic caucuses.
  3. More than three out of five Iowans (64 percent) -- including 73 percent of Democrats, 54 percent of Republicans and 68 percent of Independents agree with the following statement: "... the best energy alternative is greater efficiency and conservation to eliminate waste, combined with more wind, solar power and other alternative energy ... doing this would ultimately save money in the form of economic benefits to the state, such as cleaner air, healthier children, and fewer public health risks.Therefore, we should not build additional coal-fired power plants in Iowa."

Wow

People are really getting it!

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Alternative is a dangerous word

the best energy alternative is greater efficiency and conservation to eliminate waste, combined with more wind, solar power and other alternative energy

Nuclear and CTL are 'alternative' energy sources. It would have been better to say renewable energy.

Yes, but...

...how many Iowans place conservation ahead of topics like abortion, immigration, taxes, the economy, security, the military, etc.?  They may think conservation is more important than coal, but how many are willin' to actually vote for a candidate based mostly on environmental issues?

'Cause if a candidate has an eco-friendly agenda, but doesn't line up with 'em on all that other stuff, chances are most people aren't just gonna vote for the green.

Also...

...sorry, felt that I needed to add this:

Nuclear and CTL are 'alternative' energy sources. It would have been better to say renewable energy.

With Iowa bein' a mostly rural state that's riding the ethanol craze, even the word "renewable" should be used carefully.


No ethanol question?

That would be the big one for Iowa.  we have seen a lot of pandering to Iowans on ethanol, while the rest of the country seems to realize ethanol is a huge boondoggle and a big mistake.

But dissing coal is a good sign.  

Would a renewable distributed smart grid, plugin hybrids, geo heat exchange heating/cooling,and biogas from farm waste be discussed during the coal moratorium?

Doubtful, not many people have heard of these.  

http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks