Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Pandering in Michigan

Romney and McCain treat Michigan workers like credulous children

Posted by David Roberts at 4:47 PM on 14 Jan 2008

Romney and McCain are campaigning furiously in Michigan, and it's tight. Romney, for whom Michigan is make-or-break, seems to have decided it's in his best interests to sell fantasies:

Mr. Romney criticized the energy bill signed into law last month by President Bush that requires cars and trucks sold in the United States to achieve a fleet average of 35 miles per gallon by 2020. Substantial majorities in both parties in both houses of Congress approved the measure. Mr. McCain voted for it.

Mr. Romney said he opposed the new mileage standard, describing it as an anvil tossed to Detroit by a government that did not understand the auto industry or care about its workers. “As president, I will not rest as Detroit gets to see layoff after layoff after layoff,” he said.

Raise your hand if you think a single layoff could be prevented with lower fuel economy standards, while Japanese auto companies that specialize in fuel-efficient vehicles are kicking American automakers' asses.

McCain responded sensibly:

"I am convinced that Detroit can not only meet these standards but exceed them. Maybe Governor Romney doesn't think they can," McCain said aboard his Straight Talk Express bus.

But then counter-pandered:

McCain repeated an allegation he first made Saturday that Romney supported a tax increase on sport-utility vehicles. "I would not support a tax increase on SUVs," McCain said.

What did Romney actually do?

While campaigning for governor, Romney proposed decreasing the excise tax on fuel-efficient cars. In newspaper interviews at the time, Romney said such a move could lead to higher taxes on SUVs, though he never proposed raising them.

Note that in both cases, sensible past choices by the candidates are now being hung around their necks as liabilities. Not only is it depressing, but it shows a stunning degree of condescension toward Michigan workers, who are, as it happens, adults who might like to be told the truth.

Meanwhile, Michigan's popular governor Jennifer Granholm is an environmentally minded pragmatist who has long since moved past this stale, idiotic debate that pits environmental benefits against economic performance.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks