|
Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors
|
||||
Bush climate summit: Greenwashing vs. myth-bustingForeign media take a more discerning look at Bush's climate meetings this weekPosted by Joseph Romm (Guest Contributor) at 10:38 AM on 29 Sep 2007Once again, the foreign media is not fooled by Bush's PR stunt, while the U.S. media buys the White House line. The U.K.'s The Independent labeled this a "Greenwashing Climate Summit" in its headline, and opened their story with: For the first time in 16 years, a major environmental conference opens in Washington, hosted by the Bush administration. But no concrete results are expected, and that -- say European participants -- is the point of this high-level meeting. So how does the AP puff piece on the summit begin? Myth: The president refuses to admit that climate change is real and that humans are a factor. Myth: The U.S. is doing nothing to address climate change. Myth: The United States refuses to engage internationally. Uh, no. It is not about diplomacy at all. It is entirely about salesmanship and worse. Greenwashing is the better word. Undermining diplomacy would be the right phrase. And how can AP begin the story with the White House's talking points? Is that journalism -- to just reprint the White House press release? When you compare the AP story with the British story, you realize the wide chasm between serious foreign journalism and amateurish U.S. coverage. Sad. This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
|
sign in
Search Gristmill
Using Gristmill
Recent Comments
|
|||