Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Quick, before the people who really mean it show up!

U.S. industry may well help push climate legislation through the Senate this session

Posted by David Roberts at 9:43 AM on 28 Sep 2007

Read more about: climate | politics | legislation | business

Joe Lieberman says that comprehensive climate legislation in the Senate is more likely this session than people think (sub. rqd.), and that debate will probably get underway later this year or early next. But the reason he gives isn't exactly comforting:

The Connecticut independent said U.S. industry has shifted on the global warming debate and is ready for regulation.

"They want the rules of the road to be set by a Congress with the current political makeup," he said. "And they want the rules of the road to be set by an administration that is viewed as a friend of fossil-fuel industries. As a sign of this shift, several of the large, carbon-heavy businesses that have remained aloof for years are now coming into my office to engage on specifics."

In other words, climate legislation's going to pass because industry is worried that Congress is going to get more progressive after the 2008 election, so they want to act now while they still have a sizeable corporatist bloc there to advance their interests. Awesome.

sounds familiar

It's not just the fossil fuel industries who figure they'll get more favorable regulations if they push for them now.

This New York Times article listed "toys and cars, antifreeze and fireworks, popcorn and produce and cigarettes and light bulbs" as the major industries now pushing for more rules.

Nationalism faces the Global Imperative

It seems a common misconception that the US can write "the rules of the road" for efforts to resolve global GHG pollution.

In reality, it cannot usefully even write the rules for what is to be done within US borders without first knowing, in detail, what is required of it by the international community as its part in the forthcoming "Treaty of the Atmospheric Commons."

What could be written at this stage is a further set of potential obstacles to the achievement of that global treaty.

From this perspective, well-intentioned US politicians should be extremely cautious in bills' drafting, and should, as the priority, be engaged with the Indian, African and European diplomatic promoters of the "Contraction & Convergence" framework for the requisite treaty.

With that as their basic format, US politicians could at least avoid doing more harm than good.

Regards,

Bill

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks