Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Ecomagination and coal

As long as GE funds coal, its net impact is far from green

Posted by David Roberts at 8:58 AM on 17 Sep 2007

Let me pull a few excerpts from a recent WSJ story on the progress of GE's much-touted "ecomagination" campaign:

"I don't want to change the economic flow of the company," [CEO Jeffrey] Immelt says. So GE continues to sell coal-fired steam turbines and is delving deeper into oil-and-gas production. Meanwhile, its finance unit seeks out coal-related investments including power plants, which are a leading cause of carbon-dioxide emissions in the U.S.

...

Counting the emissions was a big challenge for a company with more than 3,000 facilities in 73 countries. One nettlesome question: How should GE count emissions from power plants in which its financing arm owned a stake?

Executives from the finance unit argued against counting the emissions, according to people familiar with the matter. The executives worried that counting the emissions could limit their investments and force them to cut emissions, under Mr. Immelt's initiative. The executives argued that GE shouldn't count these emissions because it didn't operate many of the plants. For the moment, these executives prevailed.

GE's first official inventory estimated its 2004 emissions of global-warming gases at 11.26 million metric tons, roughly equal to the emissions from two million cars. It did not include emissions from GE's power-plant investments, an unknown but unquestionably significant amount.

...

Still, she says business leaders decide how hard to push ecomagination in each unit. In some cases, that's meant deeper GE ties to coal. In September 2005, the same month Ms. Bolsinger took her post, GE's energy-financing unit hired a coal-industry veteran and said it hoped to finance more coal-fired plants. "We have targeted coal as a growth area," Matthew Siegel, the unit's managing director for strategic services, said in a statement at the time.

In 2006, GE's energy unit agreed to sell $600 million in steam turbines to TXU, which planned to quickly build 11 new coal-fired power plants. "At the end of the day if [customers] want to buy supercritical steam turbines, [GE] is going to sell them supercritical steam turbines," Ms. Bolsinger says.

...

In May, GE issued a new emissions inventory, including some from its partially owned power plants. The change added roughly 10 million metric tons of carbon-dioxide emissions, bringing GE's total to more than 20 million metric tons. GE executives say that whether and how to count these emissions is a complex process that is still evolving.

GE still did not include emissions from other power plants in which it owns a stake but are leased to utilities. One such Pennsylvania plant, Homer City, 90% owned by GE, emits almost 12 million metric tons of CO2 a year, more than all of GE's industrial operations.

...

Mr. Immelt says GE will continue to invest in coal-fired plants when the economics make sense. "I don't want to say no coal," he says.

Sorry to be a broken record, but as long GE is responsible for financing and building dirty coal plants, the balance of their effect on the atmosphere is overwhelmingly negative, million-dollar PR campaigns notwithstanding.

GE is a mixed bag

Really mixed. This WSJ report speaks volumes.

In Massachusetts, they're still fighting cleaning up the Housatonic River which it dumped amazing amounts of PCBS into last century (and which placed the river on the "10 most endangered rivers" list). GE's latest move is to buy some impacted properties along the river, which, as grassroots group Housatonic River Initiative has pointed out, usually leads to less stringent cleanup efforts and hence savings for the company.

Erik

The Orion Grassroots Network: supporting grassroots groups working for conservation, justice, & more

"Small minds with big egos."

GE sabotaged the solar dish program at JPL and sent death threats from Valley Forge, PA.

GE continues to suck.

It should be ripped apart into little tiny businesses! I don't believe in the miracle reformation of big business and no-one should. If they truly were capable of going green and socially conscious on their own without hard hitting regulation they've certainly had more than their chance to prove it. Time to teach them a lesson about what happens when you try to blow smoke up a billion peoples' asses!

The Black Car Project Killing cars before they kill us!
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks