|
Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors
|
||||
Do 'green' appliances live up to their promises?The WSJ asks and answersPosted by Sarah van Schagen at 7:50 AM on 07 Aug 2007
No, says Jeanine Van Voorhees, who spent $1,000 on a new energy-saving washer only to find that it coughs up dingy, cat-hair-covered clothes. "I curse that machine every time," she says, and she often washes her loads twice. (I'm no expert, but that doesn't sound energy efficient to me.) According to this Wall Street Journal article, Van Voorhees isn't alone, either. Many conscientious consumers are reporting that their energy-efficient appliances aren't living up to the marketing hype. Complaints range from mold and mildew to spotty glassware to water bills that are still high, even with "water-saving" technology. The article goes on to point out that some of these problems could in part be due to, ahem, user error: [M]any consumers don't know they need to use high-efficiency soap or half the amount of regular detergent with front-loading clothes-washers. So, buyer be aware, I guess. And if you are looking to make any major appliance purchases, green builders and energy-saving advocates have this to say: [F]ocus first on refrigerators, because unlike a dishwasher or clothes washer, they run all the time. Air conditioning units, too, tend to be big energy hogs. Cooling accounts for 11 percent of total energy use in the average home, and refrigerators and freezers account for 8 percent, according to government data compiled by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, a nonprofit group in Washington, D.C. The energy used doing laundry and dishes combined accounts for just 5 percent, according to the council.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
|
sign in
Search Gristmill
Using Gristmill
Recent Comments
|
|||