Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Do 'green' appliances live up to their promises?

The WSJ asks and answers

Posted by Sarah van Schagen at 7:50 AM on 07 Aug 2007

red washerAs home-appliance technology continues to move toward the energy-efficient (and brightly colored), more and more consumers are looking to replace their old appliances. But is it really an upgrade?

No, says Jeanine Van Voorhees, who spent $1,000 on a new energy-saving washer only to find that it coughs up dingy, cat-hair-covered clothes. "I curse that machine every time," she says, and she often washes her loads twice. (I'm no expert, but that doesn't sound energy efficient to me.)

According to this Wall Street Journal article, Van Voorhees isn't alone, either.

Many conscientious consumers are reporting that their energy-efficient appliances aren't living up to the marketing hype. Complaints range from mold and mildew to spotty glassware to water bills that are still high, even with "water-saving" technology.

The article goes on to point out that some of these problems could in part be due to, ahem, user error:

[M]any consumers don't know they need to use high-efficiency soap or half the amount of regular detergent with front-loading clothes-washers.

...

[C]onsumers [are urged] to take preventive steps [to avoid drainage problems and mold], such as cleaning the drum and door seal periodically or leaving the door open when the washer isn't in use.

...

Owners also shouldn't rinse their dishes before putting them in a water-efficient dishwasher. That is because most of the new products are equipped to handle bits of food and rinsing dishes beforehand can negate the water-savings.

So, buyer be aware, I guess.

And if you are looking to make any major appliance purchases, green builders and energy-saving advocates have this to say:

[F]ocus first on refrigerators, because unlike a dishwasher or clothes washer, they run all the time. Air conditioning units, too, tend to be big energy hogs. Cooling accounts for 11 percent of total energy use in the average home, and refrigerators and freezers account for 8 percent, according to government data compiled by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, a nonprofit group in Washington, D.C. The energy used doing laundry and dishes combined accounts for just 5 percent, according to the council.

work the web

I surfed like crazy, and found a government page that listed energy (kwh) and water (gallons) consumed by each washer.  (ah, here it is) I cross-checked that with maintenance information, and cost.

I ended up with a $1K front-load combo (both washer and dryer), that so far is working out well.

It looks to me like there is a middle ground on appliances (refrigerators too) where for a little extra cost you can get efficiency, while staying below the real luxury ('look at me') machines.

I notice that the washer pictured above has that beautiful paint job.  That's a feature that goes with the luxury line, for instance.  My combo is plain white.

Oh, did you notice that Trader Joe's detergent says in fine print that it's suitable for front-loaders?  Works for me (though I'm also working through the year of free detergent that came with my set).

Consumers Are the Problem


The problem isn't "energy efficient dishwashers".

It's people who can spend 1K on a dryer.

Get rid of them...get rid of the problem.

Texeme.Construct(function(x)=Participation(x))

Gamers Kill Planet


Think it's on virtual when you shoot 'em up in rainbow six?   You're also frying the planet:

Cool electronic gear may be emitting too much heat
http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-heat4aug04,1,5150 ...

"Microsoft won't say how many are failing or what causes the "red rings of death" that signify a system crash. But design consultants and electronics repairmen say the powerful console's wide temperature swings -- from the supercharged heat of game play to overnight cool -- is causing the solder to crack, fracturing the tiny electrical connections that allow energy to flow between the circuits. Eventually, one or more of the 1,700 components or 500 million transistors overheat and fail.

The desire for more powerful home electronics gear is fueling the rise of heat-spewing gadgets.

The Xbox 360 consumes three times the power that its predecessor does, while Sony Corp.'s PlayStation 3 console guzzles eight times as much energy as the PS2, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental advocacy group.

A top-of-the-line cable television box that displays and records high-definition video can consume more energy in a year than a microwave oven or standard 32-inch TV."

Texeme.Construct(function(x)=Participation(x))

on PCs

There is an interesting new blog:

Real life with the Zonbu Mini-PC

from that:

How much power did the Zonbu consume?

I confirmed that I had rolled exactly 5h 0m on the Kill-a-watt time counter, and I looked at the total KWH used. As you might have guessed, since the box runs ~10W, it used a paltry 0.05 KWH of power over the last five wall-clock hours.



Wow!

Thanks for that information, John Bailo. -- Ron

These are only my personal opinions.
Green appliances

So people who can afford an efficient clothes washer are a problem?  How is that?

MrsMlgn
Green Appliances

MrsMign
>So people who can afford an efficient clothes washer are a problem?  How is that?

John Bailo is a troll - as shown by his constant posting of contentious statements without backing either evidence or even logical support for them - just pure assertion.  Ignore him. He is looking for attention.

Energy Star not be all end all

In a lot of situations, Energy Star means performs the top in its class.  When a lot of times getting something smaller helps more.  For instance a smaller fridge saves more than a big one that is energy star.

Going the extra green mile

This article proves (just like the food miles article) that green branding is no substitute for research.

Eat what you grow, grow what you eat
top-freezer

ac5p, choosing a "top freezer" also makes a big difference.  My (too large) top-freezer does much much better than even an "energy star" side-by-side.

Front loading washers

We got a used Equator (Italian-made) front-loading washer/dryer.  The dryer sucks (but it's 120V, so what do you expect), but the washer function is fantastic.  The clothes come out very clean, with very little soap.  Best of all, the get wrung nearly dry by the spin cycle.

I know that the Neptune line of washers had problems, to the point that there as a class-action suit against the company, but I think those issues were maintenance-related, not performance related.

If someone can't get good performance from a front-loading washer, I'd chalk it up to PBKAS (Problem Between Keyboard And Seat).

Bottom freezer for me

I have had good luck with energy stingy bottom freezers--I hate top freezers because they put the most often-accessed stuff that takes time to find (fruits and vegetables) in trays at the bottom that require bending over to pull out the drawers, which requires opening the door as wide as it will go and then leaving it open while you root around to find what you're looking for.

My bottom freezer machine is pretty darn big and uses only 515 wKh per year -- not trivial for sure, but much less than the big side-by-side hogs, and it is a pleasure to use.  

I would guess that, for many people who try to store fresh local produce in their fridge, the advantage clearly goes to a bottom freezer model that puts the produce where you can see it and grab it quickly.

The 5% Project

432 kWh / yr

That's what a White Kenmore 20.6 cu. ft. Top Freezer Refrigerator shows on their site.

While we'd be better off if the nation in general used 515 kWh / yr ... I think 432 kicks all over that.

(I think mine is a 21+ cu ft at around 445 kWh / yr.  I know that I've got a 6 cu ft freezer, and a $14.50/month electric bill.)

The problem is...

Most people won't make changes that negatively impact their current lifestyle. If they feel they have to cut back then they won't change. Until perceptions are changed it will be tough. Bringing more efficient products to the market and increasing utility efficiency will be the strongest incentives outside of niche markets.

Every year in Southern California, they run a series of news stories when the gasoline prices go up. They all say the same thing, only the price is different. They say when gas prices reach XX amount, people will take to public transportation. It doesn't happen. When they started running the stories, the price was $2.00 a gallon. Now its up to $4.00 per gallon being the breaking point. However it won't happen because public transportation in Southern California is terrible and it is terribly inconvenient. No one wants 3-4 hour commutes and 15 hour days.

It can be applied to everything. Appliances, cars, lightbulbs. People won't get smaller refrigerators because its inconvenient. They won't get smaller cars because its inconvenient. And so forth. Though I expect Hybrid sales to take off next year when GM introduces its hybrid SUVs. Not small SUVs but the Tahoe, Escalade and probably even the Hummer.  The hybrid drive will allow them to get 20 miles to the gallon instead of 12. Even Paris Hilton wants one of these new hybrids. Surprised Grist didn't pick up on that.

It isn't the appliances fault. It is the user and always trying to get something for as little as possible. 60 years of spending and disposable breeding isn't going to disappear overnight. There is a lot of work ahead.

perceptions

I guess I agree Wayne, my efficient refrigerator is huge ... but a lot of people can't take a top freezer (largely because it seems too basic or old-fashioned, not because it doesn't actually work, and have tons of space for large pizza boxes).

Can't beat research!

I'm glad to see this thread moving in the direction of research & discussion about specific appliances that users have had good experiences with.  

That is the way to save energy.  Just do good research and then buy the item that best meets your needs.  There will always be a certain washing machine or whatever that totally sucks, but there are many, many energy efficient appliances, electronics, etc. that are wonderful and save a ton of money and energy.

I have just relaced all of the lights in my house with CFLs & replaced my old refrigerator with a new Kenmore 18.2 cu.ft. that only uses 402 kWh/year!!!  I've reduced my electric bill by 25%!!!

If you're looking for new, energy efficient appliances, there's a small site that gives a bunch of data to help you make a decision.  The pages can load slowly, but it's really helped me, so it was worth the wait...

http://www.MoreEnergySavings.com

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks