Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors
Gristmill

The most moving environmental story of the year

Newsweek's cover story deserves Pulitzer -- and global action

Posted by Glenn Hurowitz (Guest Contributor) at 9:36 AM on 12 Aug 2007

Read more about: wildlife | Congo | extinction

Newsweek's Sharon Begley and Scott Johnson should get the Pulitzer Prize for last week's Newsweek cover story, "Slaughter in the Jungle." It was the most moving story of the year and clearly based on truly intrepid reportage. More importantly, I hope it provokes action to stop this brutal global slaughter of wildlife.

Scott Johnson went into the rainforest in the war-torn Congo, home to much of Africa's remaining 700 mountain gorillas. Miles from the nearest town, he discovered and recorded the worst massacre of gorillas in more than 25 years.

The rangers found the first corpse less than a hundred yards away, in a grove of vines and crooked thicket. The mammoth gorilla lay on her side, a small pink tongue protruding slightly from her lips. She was pregnant and her breasts were engorged with milk for the baby that now lay dead inside her womb ... They have not been killed for their meat or their pelts or their internal organs. In fact, no one is quite sure why they've been killed.

Be sure to check out Johnson's astonishing photos of the gorillas. What makes them so powerful, I think, is that they capture our commonality with our fellow creatures: in life, the gorillas seem inspired by the same needs and emotions as we are; in death, their poses and deep, mournful expressions evoke a crucifixion -- in this case, they are sacrifices to human greed, violence, and apathy.

It's clear, however, that whatever the facts and the tragedy of this assassination are, the gorillas are looking extinction in the eye because of many of the same threats that are menacing wildlife around the world.

Three years ago some 8,000 Rwandans crossed the border into Virunga looking for pastoral land, and mowed down more than 3,000 acres of prime gorilla habitat in less than three weeks. Earlier this year Tutsi forces loyal to a renegade Congolese general also moved into the park, which houses not only one of the world's most remarkable collections of biodiversity but gold, coltan, zinc and valuable timber. According to local human-rights workers and renowned paleontologist Richard Leakey, among others, a corrupt mafia of charcoal merchants has recently begun harvesting Virunga's forests to fuel a $30 million-a-year industry.

It's an obscene trade-off: the destruction of one of the most majestic animals in the world for a mere $30 million in profits for thugs robbing the world of this natural wonder; and, more fundamentally, depriving these rare, sentient -- even loving -- beings of life. As Begley points out in her accompanying story, however, the fate of the gorillas is an increasingly common one:

That threat has been escalating over the past decade largely because the opening of forests to logging and mining means that roads connect once impenetrable places to towns ... The problem now is that hunting, even of supposedly protected animals, is a global, multimillion-dollar business.

Eating bushmeat "is now a status symbol," says Thomas Brooks of Conservation International. "It's not a subsistence issue. It's not a poverty issue. It's considered supersexy to eat bushmeat."...

Smoked monkey carcasses travel from Ghana to New York and London, while gourmets in Hanoi and Guangzhou feast on turtles and pangolins (scaly anteaters) from Indonesia. There is a thriving market for bushmeat among immigrants in Paris, New York, Montreal, Chicago and other points in the African diaspora, with an estimated 13,000 pounds of bushmeat -- much of it primates -- arriving every month in seven European and North American cities alone. "Hunting and trade have already resulted in widespread local extinctions in Asia and West Africa," says Bennett. "The world's wild places are falling silent."

The article gave me a sense that we are living in an age when the Western model of wildlife extermination and settlement -- the same model that nearly extinguished the bison of the American prairie in the 19th century -- is now being exported on a global scale. Animals that were thought to be at little or no risk have been decimated in an orgy of bloodlust, greed, and apathy from those who didn't care enough to stop these attacks. Hundreds of thousands of hippopotamuses have been eliminated as hunters kill them for meat and ivory. Fewer than 3000 pygmy hippos remain; logging roads have brought the hunters to their once protected homes.

Most frustrating of all is how small the profits are from much of this destruction. It's not like we're competing against billions of dollars; it's a $30-million charcoal industry killing the gorillas; $3.6 million a year for bushmeat from a province in Laos; $6 for a baboon.

Extinction is happening on the cheap, but in that cheapness, there is hope: it wouldn't be too hard for concerned global citizens to come up with the cash to overnight radically alter the economic incentives that are now decimating the world's wildlife. Perhaps most simply, forests (and their living wildlife) could be given value under international (or national) global warming reduction regimes. Countries and individuals would get financial credit for the enormous amounts of carbon dioxide stored by intact pristine forests -- credit that would amount to more than $10,000 per hectare under current carbon prices on the European carbon trading market.

Of course, as I pointed out in this recent New York Times op-ed co-written with Bill Powers: to make that happen, governments will have to allow polluters to get global warming credit for protecting the earth's forests as carbon sinks (deforestation currently accounts for more than 20 percent of global greenhouse-gas emissions -- more than China's total emissions), which would have the enormous side benefit of protecting the wildlife in them from encroaching roads and hunters.

These efforts are gaining speed; even the Bush administration is saying it will put some money towards tropical forest conservation. But with forests and wildlife disappearing so rapidly, it needs to happen far faster if we're going to save millions of hectares of forests and the creatures (and indigenous people) that make them home (and that act as the lungs of the planet, breathing in carbon dioxide and breathing out oxygen).

I hope you're inspired to join me in taking action to actually make this happen. Click here to contact members of Congress and ask them to finance forest conservation to help protect the earth's vanishing wildlife.

Sad and terrifyinhg stuff...

The bushmeat trade as you rightly point out is fueled largely by elite demand and is one of the most immoral trades in the world. From shark fins to whales to monkeys there are those in the world who simply don't care about other beings- it's all me me me and dam the rest. I think serious criminal penalties are needed for those involved in such a barbarous and cruel trade. It's one thing to kill for survival, but this is perverse gluttony writ large.

I teach environmental economics and blog at www.voicesofreason.info.
Back in 2000/2001

I broke the coltan story to the British media. At that point it was worth more than the timber and diamonds flowing from the Congo, and its miners were invading national parks and killing gorillas and elephants.

However, the cellphone companies (who were buying most of the coltan) didn't want to make much of a fuss about it (the phones were just taking off, and they didn't want a downer on the party), and did not ever make publicised efforts to source their coltan elsewhere. There was much talk behind the scenes between them and some gorilla organisations that never really came to much, as far as I could figure out. A Belgian group called 'no blood on my mobile' was about the highest-profile effort to get the thing sorted out. They, at least, got Sabena to stop flying coltan ore out of central Africa in the cargo holds of its passenger planes.

The UN has documented the web of corruption that feeds the forest invasions in quite some depth since at least 2000, but very little has been done about it. Various military leaders who control the areas are selling timber, ivory, coltan, diamonds etc. through a network of mostly Lebanese middlepersons (one of the 'queenpins' is a woman) and it's being moved out to global markets by arms dealers and other nefarious types (British, Russian, Chinese etc.)

The eastern DRC is just too far away, I guess. Although gorillas sometimes make the press, the thousands of people who are being killed in the rush for riches in that area barely get a mention.  Their names are recorded on obscure French-language Congolese expat listservs, if at all.

Whiskerfish

A terrible tragedy for gorillas and humans

This story is indeed very moving.

Actually having polluters offset their emissions by protecting tropical forests is not entirely applicable to this situation because the gorilla massacres are occurring within the boundaries of a designated park.  A better solution for this tragedy would be to prioritize development aid to the DRC for park management and protection.  Also Western governments have not worked very hard to stabilize the country (probably because their mining companies have benefited from the instability as documented in the UN Panel of Experts investigation from 2001 and 2002).  Some wealth transfer from developed countries to the global South is clearly necessary to preserve tropical carbon storage, but it won't stop the gorilla massacres in the eastern DRC (nor will it stop the massacres of humans there).

Whiskerfish, I'm interning with a group doing work on mining in terms of the environment, human rights, and economic justice in the DRC.  Have you done work on chain-of-custody for coltan and other minerals mined artisanally from the DRC (especially from the DRC to the US)? As far as I know, few if any groups in the US have done an in-depth chain of custody investigation.  I would be extremely interested in any information you have or any reports you've authored, even if they're only pertinent to the UK.  My email is arob@dartmouth.edu, thanks

arob

I'd need more details on who you were working for before I passed on any (by now probably rather out of date) info. Send an email to wetclaws@yahoo.com, and they'll pass it on to me.

Whiskerfish

bush meat trade

I think eco groups need to make tackling the bush meat trade a priority. In some quarters I think some groups may see it as taboo to campaign against what many people see as subsistance hunting, but it's clear that what's happening is not subsistance. Nobody should have to kill and eat exotic wildlife to survive.  There's many environmental problems with livestock as well, so partnering with aid groups to promote sustainable plant-based diets in these impoverished areas would be a smart move.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks