Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Loan star

Making energy efficiency possible for cheapskate homeowners

Posted by Clark Williams-Derry (Guest Contributor) at 10:00 AM on 20 Jul 2007

Verdant - 180Apropos of my recent realization that if I had bought a new furnace on credit rather than waiting to save up the cash I'd have saved a bundle of money over the last 5 years, here's something I've been meaning to write about for months: a Vancouver developer that came up with a smart -- I mean, diabolically smart -- financing scheme to build a super-efficient condo complex. (Proving, I suppose, biodiversivist's point that spreadsheets are, in fact, wonderful things.)

All things being equal, I imagine that most real estate developers don't care one way or the other if their buildings are energy efficient. If they can make some money by building green -- or at least recoup their costs -- they'll do it. If they can't, they'll cut corners. I suppose a few virtuous souls forgo some profits, say, by installing efficiency features that they can't quite recoup on sale. But for the most part, the developers are going to follow the profit motive: if the costs of a super-efficient heating system are higher than home-buyers are willing to pay, the developer is going to skimp.

That'd be fine, if consumers were rational about energy purchases. But we're not. In fact, most people's decisions about energy efficiency -- well, mine at least -- are really dopey. In my case, I was too worried about taking on new debt to realize that utility bill savings would have more than paid for the financing cost of a new furnace. I could have saved money from day one. Only myopia prevented me from seeing that.

For a condo-buyer, the problem is similar. Most prospective buyers are looking for the cheapest possible mortgage -- which means that they undervalue long-term savings on utility bills. So they're not willing to take on a bigger mortgage for a more efficient heating system -- even if it saves them money in the long run. (Or, really, even in the short run.)

So what makes this Vancouver developer, reSource Rethinking Building, and their Verdant development so clever is that they figured out how to get around all that. They used some innovative financing to make energy efficiency profitable for everyone -- from day one.

Here's how it worked. The developer took out a loan (kudos to Vancity Capital for taking this on) to build a hyper-efficient heating system -- a ground-source heat pump, which is just about the most climate-friendly way to heat a big building. For collateral, the loan itself was backed by the future energy savings. In effect, this meant that the developer paid next to nothing out of pocket to build the super-efficient heating system.

After the development is finished, the loan will be transferred to the condo association (in Canada, they're called strata corporations, but it's the same thing). The loan financing costs will show up as a line item in condo fees -- a fixed cost every month that won't go up over time. But because the system is so efficient, condo owners will pay less for their heat -- combining utility and financing costs -- than if the condo had a standard gas furnace. They pay no more for the condo and pay less per month in condo and utility fees.

I don't know if this description does a good enough job of describing how diabolically clever all of this is. The developer does the right thing, but doesn't have to pay anything for it -- the financing gets passed down to the future owners. The condo owners pay the financing costs as part of their condo fees -- but wind up paying less, overall, to stay toasty in winter. The financers get their cash back, plus interest. More money goes to local engineers and laborers, and less money goes to distant natural gas fields. Greenhouse gases are avoided. Everyone wins.

Anyone want to try this south of the 49th parallel?

More details on Condo Energy Efficiency Loans

The Verdant isn't actually the first time this has been done.  A Toronto-based developer Tridel did this same sort of condo loan (they called it a "green loan"), which was funded by the Toronto Atmospheric Fund.  More info here: http://www.naturallybetter.ca/commitment/greenfinancing.a ...

It should definitely come to the US, there are no institutional obstacles.  The challenge is lining up the financing.  Its awkward for someone to fund  green improvements who isn't the main construction lender...and most construction lenders don't have this on their radar.

Windmill, another Canadian developer who's starting to enter the US market, is also looking at these loans...exciting stuff!

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks