Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

'Breakthrough' at G8: U.S. agrees to consider a process of setting a goal to agree on a commitment to agreeing on a process

Progress ... we think

Posted by David Roberts at 10:50 AM on 07 Jun 2007

I confess I haven't had the intestinal fortitude to closely follow the negotiations at the G8, but it looks like they've come up with something being billed as a "breakthrough." This phrasing in the Washington Post story is curious:

The goal is to agree to cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2050, Merkel said, hailing the decision as a "huge success."

"The goal is to agree"? Does that mean they've agreed to agree, or that they agreed to try to agree? Tell us more!

But the declaration falls short of an ironclad commitment, saying only that the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitters should "seriously consider" following the European Union, Canada and Japan in seeking to halve their output by 2050.

They're going to seriously consider agreeing to set a goal to agree. Victory!

"No one can escape this political declaration. It is an enormous step forward," [Merkel] told reporters.

Asked if there was "wiggle room" in the declaration, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said there will be no agreement "until there's an agreement that has America and China in it.

"However, there is now a process to lead to that agreement and at its heart is a commitment to a substantial cut. What does substantial mean? That serious consideration is given to the halving of emissions by 2050," he said.

A process to lead to an agreement to seriously consider a commitment!

Still, Blair called the deal "a major, major step forward."

If you say so.

A New Day At Grist!

Wow, you didn't mention or blame Bush once during this article.

What's the matter -- did someone's aunt get sick and die?

I mean, shouldn't you be lambasting Bush for not saying we should cut our CO2 production by 99% percent?    Maybe we should all just stop breathing for a few days?  

Or how about that the G8 had the guts to blame the biggest polluters, India and China and focus on them rather than on the US and Europe who are busily developing technology that may solve the problems?

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks