Staff Contributors
Staff Contributors
Adam Browning
Adam Stein
Alan Durning
Andrew Dessler
Andrew Sharpless
Ariane Lotti
Ben Tuxworth
biodiversivist
Brad Johnson
Coby Beck
Edward Mazria
Eric de Place
Erik Hoffner
Frank O'Donnell
Gar Lipow
Glenn Hurowitz
Guest author
Jason D Scorse
Jim Goodman
JMG
John McGrath
John McQuaid
Jon Rynn
Joseph Romm
Josh Dorner
Ken Ward
Kit Stolz
Laura Hess
Lisa J. Bunin
Lou Bendrick
Maywa Montenegro
Melinda Henneberger
Meredith Niles
Michael Hoexter
Michael Moynihan
Miles Grant
Sean Casten
Sharon Astyk
Steph Larsen
Stephanie Paige Ogburn
Summer Rayne Oakes
Thomas Dobbs
Van Jones
Zoe Bradbury


More significant energy developments in D.C. today

Lots of stuff going on in D.C.

Posted by David Roberts at 4:19 PM on 27 Jun 2007

Read more about: politics | energy | climate | legislation

Lordy, the developments are happening so fast I can barely keep up with them. Here are a few more of note.

Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and John Warner (R-Va) are teaming up to put together comprehensive climate legislation. You can bet that whatever they come up with is going to be way over on the business-friendly side of things, but nonetheless this is a big development. Lieberman and Warner are both key members of the Senate EPW committee, where chair Barbara Boxer has come under fire lately for losing control of the climate change issue and letting it slide.

Warner is old, old school. If he's on board, that could provide the impetus for things to get going and even get passed in EPW. Here's a bit from the press release (which I can't find online):

The new bill will aim to structure an economy-wide cap and trade program that provides maximum flexibility to the marketplace to meet a level of attainable emission reductions that are environmentally credible. It will provide federal investment in new technologies, include cost-containment provisions, and ensure international participation by developing nations.

... Senator Warner said, "In my 28 years in the Senate, I have focused above all on issues of national security, and I see the problem of climate change as fitting within that focus. It is the responsibility of the Executive and Legislative Branches to join in taking a leadership role to address this national and international problem. This duty was made clear by the Supreme Court's ruling earlier this year that confirmed the federal government's obligation under the law to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. I look forward to working with Senator Lieberman and my Senate colleagues to craft a comprehensive climate bill."

Big news.

Elsewhere, today the House passed a Interior and environment appropriations bill (sub. rqd.) -- after, if you can believe this, criticism from Republicans about the number of earmarks ... the gall -- that included a "Sense of the Congress" resolution recognizing the urgency of climate change and the need for a mandatory program to cut emissions. Smokey Joe Barton tried to block the amendment, but was outvoted 153-274, with 44 Republicans crossing over. Looks like both parties are getting the message. (Oh, the bill also boosts funding for parts and environmental protections, which is cool too.)

Yet elsewhere, the House Science Committee passed four energy bills (sub. rqd.) today that will eventually, says chair Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.), be rolled into the comprehensive House energy legislation slated for July. They are:

  • the Global Change Research and Data Management Act (H.R. 906), which would expand the U.S. Global Change Research program to include more policy-relevant inquiry;
  • the Department of Energy Carbon Capture and Storage Research, Development and Demonstration Act (H.R. 1933), which would put aside money for CCS research and demonstration projects (interestingly, an amendment to make CTL plants eligible for these funds was defeated);
  • the Biofuels Research and Development Enhancement Act (H.R. 2773), which would create an information center to coordinate research on biofuels (interestingly, an amendment to make CTL eligible for some of this research money was defeated);
  • and finally, the Solar Energy Research and Advancement Act (H.R. 2774), which would establish a program within the DOE to research integrating concentrated solar into regional energy grids and reducing the amount of water concentrated solar uses; it would also put aside grant money for solar industry training and internship programs.

And finally, today both Chrysler and Ford joined the U.S. Climate Action Partnership. That means all three big American automakers are on board behind a cap-and-trade system.

Whew. Could you have seen any of this coming two years ago?

It is a start, I had hoped for more.

Energy legislation supports business interests galore, scant science, demonstrates lack of leadership on the big picture, fragments of progress and not.

The security issue of global warming is a big epiphany on the right, adds legitimacy to government action that goes beyond business interests.

No liquid coal is most excellent.

Significant?

It sure is! THis kind of legislation is terrifically significant in that it signifies we are NOWHERE NEAR adopting significant legislation - the kind that will reduce by 90% in thirty years.

Vote for a Democrat and you vote against the environment.

Vote for a Republican and you vote against the environment.

It's irresponsible as hell for Grist to not hold our elected officials to task. Not to DEMAND more from all of them. In the end, Grist will endorse the Democrat candidate, IRRESPECTIVE of his or her environmental stance.

And you call yourselves 'concerned.'

Show some dedication to the cause, for fuck's sake.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks