Staff Contributors
Staff Contributors
Adam Browning
Adam Stein
Alan Durning
Andrew Dessler
Andrew Sharpless
Ariane Lotti
Ben Tuxworth
biodiversivist
Brad Johnson
Coby Beck
Edward Mazria
Eric de Place
Erik Hoffner
Frank O'Donnell
Gar Lipow
Glenn Hurowitz
Guest author
Jason D Scorse
Jim Goodman
JMG
John McGrath
John McQuaid
Jon Rynn
Joseph Romm
Josh Dorner
Ken Ward
Kit Stolz
Laura Hess
Lisa J. Bunin
Lou Bendrick
Maywa Montenegro
Melinda Henneberger
Meredith Niles
Michael Hoexter
Michael Moynihan
Miles Grant
Sean Casten
Sharon Astyk
Steph Larsen
Stephanie Paige Ogburn
Summer Rayne Oakes
Thomas Dobbs
Van Jones
Zoe Bradbury


Feed-in tariffs: feeding hope for survival

Making a market for solar in Eugene, Oregon

Posted by JMG (Guest Contributor) at 1:30 PM on 15 May 2007

Read more about: energy | solar voltaic power | Oregon

Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) offers to buy solar power produced by customers at 15 cents/kWh.

I was actually

I was actually just in Eugene over the weekend reading up on this.  

Until reading the article I wasn't entirely sure what the difference between a feed-in tariff and a direct buy-down would be.

They mention that the large advantage of the feed-in tariff is that it promotes people to produce more electricity than they use.

It also promotes panels, equipment, and setups which are actually effective at harvesting sunlight.

I can see why Germany and Japan have had so much success with feed-in tariffs.

_

Also in a podcast interview with Tom King the CEO of PG&E (Northern California's Utility) I remember hearing that they were looking into either feed-in tariffs, or maybe it was netmetering with the advantage of getting more money past the breakeven point.

http://www.svmg.org/campaigns/ceoshow/podcasts/5.01.07CEO ...[KLIV].mp3

-David Ahlport

Hrmm

Bad link

Podcast Interview with PG&E CEO, Tom King

-David Ahlport

Is This A Good Deal?

Would you rather have 15 cents a kWh or $3 a watt rebate with net metering?  I think I would rather the rebate and the net metering.

Depends

Yes, well, wouldn't that depend on how you've structured your net metering program, whether there is a monthly charge to participate in it, how much insolation you were likely to get where you were, etc.  For example, Michigan's so-called net metering tariff (which, surprise!, has no takers) actually requires the customer to pay for and install an entire second meter .... like a kid with spinach and potatoes on the plate, can't let those electrons touch, you know

The 5% Project
Net Metering California Style

At least one meter installed to read the net usage of the residential customer with that meter and any other meter installed at the cost of the utility.   No additional charge, hell there is no additional cost, it is just a meter read.

I think this form of net metering with a nice rebate is the way to go.  I am surprised how few people take advantage of this program here in California.

I'm not suprised

I am surprised how few people take advantage of this program here in California.

I'm not.
Silicon solar panels aren't yet cost effective.

But this next wave of CIGS thinfilm panels in 2008 should change the game.

http://www.greyfalcon.net/pv

-David Ahlport

Ummmm

My math regarding the summer rates for power in the Palm Springs area is not in my post and with that the associated pay back.

In any case, I was out in the Palm Springs area today looking more into that with the local utility.  The reason it does not fit in is that with the rebate a customer must sign up for time of use service.  As the rebate is capped that makes the deal uneconomic.

This kind of makes the rebate deal ineffective.


You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks