Seriously, what the hell?  Unless you're putting bare bulbs all over your house I defy you to tell the difference.  We've replaced all of our incandescents and cannot tell the difference, as the light is being filtered through frosted enclosures, lamp shades or are indirect.

As for the other article assertions, maybe CFLs sell more slowly in grocery stores because people buy 1 or 2 replacement bulbs there, but at Home Depot go on a swap out spree because they're actually cheap there.  And old-style CFLs did suck; I doubt it's just women who became gun shy after dealing with them.

As for JMG, I think you can have any light you damn well please next to you in bed.  Having strong preferences about a light two feet from your head makes a hell of a lot more sense than freaking out because your bathroom is lit in some new, subtle way.

Getting divorced over things like the setting on a thermostat, the types of bulbs above the bathroom mirror, length of showers, or a bedroom reading light would be a  heavy price to pay for very little gain.

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world

Now why women would find the warmup time more annoying than men is not clear (if they do, but presuming the statements cited in the story are true -- and when I say that they find the warmup time more annoying than men, perhaps it's a tie, and they find both equally annoying).  

I do note that, in my house, the story rings true---bought my first "compact" florescents from 7th Generation in 1990 or something and, as I recall, I paid something like $27 each for three big honking huge quad tubes (that we are still using today).  My non-gossiping, non-pie-baking, mathematically adept wife thought I was being a little over the top, and perhaps still does.

I simply note that my bride has never sought out or bought a CFL in the intervening years, and seems fully able to move into a new apartment and not immediately change all the lights over.  Where we last lived before this apt., she would not install the dimmable CFLSs into the overhead fixture in her office.


The 5% Project

I also note the great improvement in flicker and delay in the new generation of CFLs. JMG, are you cheaping out with old bulbs? Think of your marriage and get her input next time.

In the interest of statistics: I bake pies, but don't gossip much.
_______________
Grow what you eat

Seriously people are you not all outraged that the author lays the blame on the US's dismal cfl adoption rates squarely, and soley, on women's vanity? He makes no mention of the higher electricity prices in Japan, Germany and the UK which surely have some influence on the use of cfls there and deserve some mention in this story.

I'm sure the enlightened prius-driving, bike-riding, public-transport-taking, walk-to-work men on gristmill would be upset with my suggested next story on oil. Just like the cfl vanity story, there is some truth to it, but it isn't nearly the whole story and comes nowhere close to being news, especially not front page news.

I know that you sure won't get any argument in these parts that US oil imports have EVERYTHING to do with advertisers' ability to manipulate the average US male's real or feared inadequacies ...

I mean, Jesus, I saw an ad for a RIDING LAWNMOWER that showed a guy looking downcast and sad when his neighbor shouted over the fence "HEY!  22 minutes, not bad eh!" ... and then showing the downcast guy all hard and firm and ready to defend his manhood again by going to Home Depot to buy a BIGGER LAWNMOWER than his neighbor.

Trust me, Auk, there's probably nothing you can say about males thinking with their lower brains that isn't at least half true.

Back on the CFL story though, I don't recall women's distaste for the lights being ascribed to their vanity.  The article said this, which seems to attribute the bulbs' low acceptance rate to the failings of the first generation lights (bulbs that are quite possibly still in use, as several first gen ones are in my house):

======
"There is still a big hurdle in convincing Americans that lighting-purchase decisions make a big difference in individual electricity bills and collectively for the environment," said Wendy Reed, director of the federal government's Energy Star campaign, which labels products that save energy and has been working with retailers to market CFL bulbs.

"I have heard time and again that a husband goes out and puts the bulb into the house, thinking he is doing a good thing," Reed said. "Then, the CFL bulb is changed back out by the women. It seems that women are much more concerned with how things look. We are the nesters."

A key to the abiding grass-roots resistance to CFLs, Reed and other experts said, is indelible consumer memories of the hideous looks and poor quality of earlier generations of fluorescent lights. They were bulky. They were expensive, as much as $25 each. They had an annoying flicker and hum. They cast an icky, cold-white light that made people look pale, wrinkly and old.

"People remember them from 20 years ago and they are not going to forgive," said Dave Shiller, vice president of new business development for MaxLite, a Fairfield, N.J., company that manufactures CFL bulbs.

A new breed of bulbs solves most, if not all, of the old gripes. The bulbs are smaller and much cheaper -- often selling for as little as $1.50 each at big-box stores. Most bulbs pay for themselves in reduced power consumption within six months. They last seven to 10 years longer than incandescent bulbs. The hum and flicker are long gone, and many bulbs are designed to mimic the soothing, yellowish warmth of incandescent bulbs. (Most, though, still do not work on dimmers.)
=====

Can you explain how you get from women saying that they don't like the way the light looks to "vanity?"

The 5% Project

I've changed our CFLs multiple times this very year (new house, and yes, I did it, not my wife). I took half of them back, because the problems the industry says it has solved are still there for me. The flicker can be pretty subliminal but still give me a quite measurable headache. Color in some bulbs changes over time as the bulbs heat up, ending in a cold blue that is quite depressing at night (and makes people look pretty depressing, too.) Kelvin ratings are clearly off, warm white isn't, etc., lumens estimates are all over the map compared to incandescents. It's a mess. I fear a new wave of backlash if the industry doesn't get its act together stop overpromising, and uniformly label its products according to standardized testing methods.

You'll dismiss me as a crank, but it's not for lack of trying to do the right thing on my part, given three trips to three different hardware stores, including two big boxes and a lighting specialty shop. Headaches and depression are real, measurable effects of lighting that vary from person to person, so blanket statements like "change to CFLs" are a bit simplistic...

If anyone knows of a good web site devoted to this, let me know, thanks.

No, I've tested bulbs from a range of manufacturers, and you are quite correct.  There is a noticable variation in quality on construction (which influences the hum), on-time, warmup curve, and color temp.  Although my biggest problem with color temp has been that the commonly available bulbs are all either too low (2700K) or too high (5500+K) for my tastes.

I am surprised that you perceive flicker, since these bulbs are electronically ballasted at something like 10kHz, which should be well beyond the ability of a human to perceive under any circumstances.  But it doesn't surprise me that some people are annoyed by them in various ways.  However, it may be that your level of sensitivity is rare enough that it won't be a problem for most people.

I think it is clear that happiness is largely a matter of having positive social relationships once food and shelter are concerned. It's sad that in the US our work lives have us so fragmented that we get twitchy about things like our appearance.

The refusal to switch to CFL's is akin to perfectly lovely women pancakeing their faces with make-up and men with adoring mates lusting after the biggest truck on the lot. Whatever we actually have we seem to think that it's just not enough.

Given a choice between possibly looking a little off color today or having a stable climate in ten years most women are going to choose the flattering lights.

Advertising has manipulated our self worth in such a deep way that we are willing to scatter known poisons about our living quarters in order to get a little bit of a social confidence boost.

I really think the bulk of the changes will wait until AFTER another Katrina level disaster. It's just too bad.

Put the Carbon Back

It is quite credible, though, that they are manufactured at different grades of quality.  I suspect we are getting the top line: individually packaged, for which we pay a pretty penny, at either of our local hardware stores.

As for wives with minds of their own, aren't there pumpkin shells for dealing with that problem?

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

As for the other comments, I won't deny that the story could ring true in one household and not another.  I do take issue, however, with broad gender characterizations based on a few anecdotes and some very weak attempts at linking correlation with causation.  I believe it's counterproductive (and occasionally insulting) to create these neat little boxes that reinforce sexist prejudices.  Especially to generate FUD around what should be a straightforward course of action.  Perhaps the author will next inform us of how low-VOC paints don't supply the necessary range of hues for discerning gay couples because he talked to a few of them about it.

To add to the quasi-scientific survey, I don't much like CFLs, in terms of performance; I don't like the quality of the light, it is cold and somehow a bit muddy at the same time. Most of our light fixtures are open, so you can see the bulbs, and let's face it, CFLs aren't the most asthetic things on the planet.

So - I put them where I can, and where they don't make me crazy. We do like candlelight, however, and often that is our only source of light at night, so maybe that makes up for it!

http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=cfls.advan ...

My wife drives a Prius, recycles, yada, yada... and has also complained about every CFL I have ever installed in the house.

I did replace the linear fluorescents in the kitchen with T8's and electronic ballasts, she likes those just fine.

Common sense is an oxymoron...

Armed with a list of manufacturers and brands, I guess I'll have to try again.

Kaela

Applications for CFL:  High use areas in homes that do not have high heating demand.

Applications for incandescent:

1.  Low use areas, like the attic, some closets etc.
   
2.  Homes with no A/C and located in the north.  

1. No differentiation between types of bulbs ... I can supply you a bunch of CFLs that anyone/everyone would hate. I have, in my rooms, CFLs that people don't realize are CFLs until I tell them. (My only CFL failures to date are satisfactory dimmables in recessed lights (went LED) and dimmable in a chandelier (remain on incandescents -- rarely used).  I had some disasters along the way (vanity lights testing from Wal-Mart -- two packages, three blew up within seconds of going into the wall, other three give very inconsistent and, often, mediocre light) but have found lights that everyone likes (and, this has led me to have different lighting styles in virtually every room to taste/requirements).

2.  Grocery stores -- most grocery stores that I see have very few CFLs within a mainly incandescent mix and the CFLs are typically not given equal footing (bottom of shelf space, just basic CFLs while there are 20+ types of incandescent bulbs). There is no information provided about CFL benefits other than on the package. And, price per bulb is (much) higher than at hardware stores.

3. I really wonder at 6-month payback period. For my most used lights (kitchen), the payback period was far less than that at 6 cents/kwh electricity. (And, that was with higher priced CFLs rather than discounted package prices now available.)  US average is 9.5 cents. Thus, I would expect payback to be far less than six months for most Americans.

Personally I am using TCP (Technical Consumer Products) bulbs.  I am moderately happy with them.  They start up instantly and warm up fast, but they are prone to humming, especially in multi-bulb fixtures.  The main thing I like about them is that I can get them in my preferred color temps (3100K - 3500K), though I had to special order them.

I have used TCP bulbs before, and been happier with them in the past.  This latest batch has a slightly different shape, and appears to be of lower quality overall: I'm guessing that they switched to a different factory (probably in China somewhere) and/or a different design, producing a lower quality product more cheaply.  Next time, I'll try something else.

A couple of side notes:  A prominent architectural lighting designer of my acquaintance has told me that the straight-tube CFLs are superior to the spiral CFLs, because the straight tubes allow for more even vaporization and distribution of the mercury.  Ideally, these bulbs are mounted nearly horizontal, with the tubes pointing slightly down, to facilitate the mercury vapor distribution.

He says that spiral CFLs tend to burn out faster because the gas distribution isn't as good.  And that matches my experience, with spiral bulbs turning black near the base, before they burn out entirely.

This same fellow recommends GE CFLs.  I haven't tried them yet, but I will the next time I have to change out my bulbs.

Low-use areas -- well, for me, those are the areas that get the CFLs that didn't pass muster to be in a bedside lamp.

Blogging regularly at Energy Smart to Energize America .

My wife has never liked them, except for the fact that I don't complain as much when they're left on.  She claims to be able to see and hear the differences.  Personally, I don't like them much either, and I doubt I've saved any money by using them all these years.  Still, I continue to buy them, in case I get a good batch.  (The one that would seem least likely to live long, the one outside on the porch ceiling, has lasted the longest so far, about 3 years.)  Hopefully we'll all be using LEDs in the relatively near future.

The humming/flicker has as far as I know been phazed out both because of technology (magnetic ballasts v.s. electronic ballasts) and because of education, as long as they are in the appropriate fixtures you should have no problem.  Once in a while you can get a bad one, which if you bought at a home improvement store, they will typically replace, or they should have a toll free number to the manufacturer on the ballast.

I recommend them for everyone, the savings are huge, not only do they use roughly 75% less energy but they last 6-10 times longer than a normal incandescent bulb, which means replacing lightbulbs less, not to mention less bulbs in the land fills.  

Now for one important note.  These bulbs contain MERCURY, not a lot, about 1/10 of a watch battery.  So please, contact your local waste management company and recycle them.  

Please feel free to send comments/questions.

Thank You.

CFLs in previous homes I've lived in were of similar longevity.

I like bulbs in the 3000K-3500K range.  Unfortunately, they are generally hard to find.

What that says, I do not know. I loves me my CFLs, and use about 120 kWh of electricity a month (sadly, my stove is electric).