Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Great Danes

Denmark is a model of energy independence

Posted by David Roberts at 3:08 PM on 16 Apr 2007

Read more about: energy | politics | Denmark | renewable energy

Back in January, Jonathan Cohn wrote a fantastic piece in The New Republic about Denmark. Conventional economic wisdom says that countries must choose between robust social services and economic growth. But, Cohn wrote, Denmark casts doubt on that notion:

Over the last decade, the Danes have turned the conventional wisdom on its head by boasting not only one of the world's most expansive welfare states, but also one of its most robust economies. Given the way average American workers' wages continue to stagnate even as their burden of risk -- of losing a job, of losing medical insurance -- continues to rise, it looks increasingly as though the conservative triumphalism has been misplaced: It may be that Europe has something to teach us after all.

Today comes an essential supplement to Cohn's piece, in the form of a page-one story in the Wall Street Journal: "How Denmark Paved Way To Energy Independence." Here's the nut:

The result of these and other policies is that Denmark's energy consumption -- the amount of fuel it uses to heat its buildings, drive its cars and power its economy -- has held stable for more than 30 years, even as the country's gross domestic product has doubled, according to the International Energy Agency, a Paris group that tracks energy prices and policies. During the same period, energy consumption in the U.S. has risen 40%, while its GDP has quadrupled. The average Dane uses 6,600 kilowatt hours of electricity a year, compared with 13,300 for the average American.

And what are the policies in question? Harnessing the Magic of the Market? No: government tax and regulatory policy. How can they get away with it?

... in Denmark, much of the country's energy sector is in the hands of nonprofit cooperatives, with residents as shareholders, which makes it easier for government to direct policy with little opposition from business interests. With a population of 5.5 million people, Denmark also is a social welfare state that puts a higher priority on things like generous health care, free schools and guaranteed pensions than on profits, low taxes and individualism.

Now, this being the WSJ, they have to say this: "The downside is higher taxes and costs for businesses and consumers." But we should try to take a step back and remember that higher taxes and prices are not "downsides" in and of themselves. They are downsides insofar as they degrade the quality of life of consumers.

In contrast, if consumers exchange higher taxes and prices for decreased risk, energy independence, and improved health, security, and leisure time, then how exactly is it a "downside"? The Danes don't seem to see it as one:

... Danish individuals have largely acquiesced to the higher energy prices. In an opinion poll by the European Union last year, more people in Denmark than in any other country said they would be willing to pay higher prices for energy derived from clean sources.

And why wouldn't they? It seems a strange American phenomenon, this idea that low prices and low taxes are goods in their own right, whatever sacrifices in quality of life are required to sustain them.

Anyway, read the piece. Turns out Danes have mastered cogeneration, district heating, and energy efficiency. A fine model.

Yeah, but...

I seem to remember that Denmark scored very well on last year's WSJ/Heritage Foundation (gasp!) Index of Economic Freedom. Top five, if memory serves, with the US tied for ninth. The index measures a wide range of indicators including tax burdens, regulatory environment, banking practices, etc. At any rate, it hardly sounds as though the Danes have abandoned the market, the profit motive, and economic growth in favor of a heavily regulated and centrally planned state - though it is true that they have chosen to maintain a substantial social welfare system. What is remarkable (and maybe instructive) is that, for the moment, they appear to have squared the circle to accommodate these two elements that were long thought to be antagonistic.

Denmark is also raking in so many petrodollars that the government has actually hired a philosopher to advise them on the morality of various investment opportunities available for the state pension system. As long as the North Sea remains relatively stable in a geopolitical sense, the Danes may be able to have their growth and redistribute some of it, too.

Melancholy is incompatible with bicycling.

Correction

With apologies to any Norwegians and/or Danes whom I have offended, it was Norway, not Denmark, that hired the philosopher to direct the ethical investment of their oil profits. Denmark is a net exporter of oil from the North Sea, but the figures I could find put them around 300,000 barrels day for export. Norway pumps around 2.4 million per day.

Sorry. I would offer to resign if I thought that it would make any difference.

Melancholy is incompatible with bicycling.

And on another note ...

... not directly related, but shedding some light on the broadly earth-loving good hearts of (at least most of) the Danish people:

http://oceans.greenpeace.org/en/the-expedition/news/to-sy ...

This report, written in Greenpeace's characteristically zealous but up-beat and optimistic style, suggests that at the meeting of the International Whaling Commission to be held in Anchorage in a couple of months, Denmark hopefully will resist the fiercely fought campaign of the Japanese to "normalize" their current whaling practices.  That is, although Denmark, a "swing" country, may wish to protect the minimal "aboriginal" whaling in the Danish territories of Greenland and the Faroe Islands, that does not amount to an endorsement of whaling as carried out by the Japanese, the Norwegians and now the Icelanders.  Also, the majority of Danes are opposed to commercial whaling, and are pressuring their government to do the right thing.

Or so Greenpeace seems to believe.

They invented a cute petition campaign, involving Lego pieces arranged to form a cheerful anti-whaling message in Danish.  An alternative idea, to sponsor a contest of cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad in the role of Captain Ahab, seems not to have got off the ground ...

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks