|
Staff Contributors
Staff Contributors
Adam Browning
Adam Stein Alan Durning Andrew Dessler Andrew Sharpless Ariane Lotti Ben Tuxworth biodiversivist Brad Johnson Coby Beck Edward Mazria Eric de Place Erik Hoffner Frank O'Donnell Gar Lipow Glenn Hurowitz Guest author Jason D Scorse Jim Goodman JMG John McGrath John McQuaid Jon Rynn Joseph Romm Josh Dorner Ken Ward Kit Stolz Laura Hess Lisa J. Bunin Lou Bendrick Maywa Montenegro Melinda Henneberger Meredith Niles Michael Hoexter Michael Moynihan Miles Grant Sean Casten Sharon Astyk Steph Larsen Stephanie Paige Ogburn Summer Rayne Oakes Thomas Dobbs Van Jones Zoe Bradbury |
||||
Giuliani opposes Congressional fuel economy dealPosted by Joseph Romm (Guest Contributor) at 6:36 PM on 09 Dec 2007
What is his alternative strategy? Politically, as readers know, only one other alternative strategy exists: "technology, technology, technology, blah, blah, blah." Yes, Rudy wants to subsidize hybrids and biofuels -- a voluntary strategy that has failed to stop the steady decline in average fuel economy, and the steady increase in gasoline consumption, in this country since the mid-1980s. We've already heard some dubious energy/climate policy from the Giuliani camp, but here he himself demonstrated that he just doesn't get it: In responding to Russert's question about the fuel economy deal, Rudy said we needed to build more oil refineries. Well, only if the strategy of fuel efficiency and alternative fuels fails -- which it certainly will if President Giuliani pushes his voluntary do-nothing technology strategy. Rudy also said he wanted to push more nuclear and "clean coal" and, weirdly, "expansion of hydroelectric power." [Note to Rudy's energy advisor -- this means you, former Energy Secretary of Herrington -- we are pretty much tapped out on hydro.] He made no mention of renewables like wind or solar. The interview is available here. The energy stuff is at the very end. I don't think he'll be the GOP nominee (though he is currently the gambler's favorite), but if he is, the interview is probably worth watching. Otherwise, not so much. This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
|
sign in
Search Gristmill
Using Gristmill
Recent Comments
|
|||