Staff Contributors
Staff Contributors
Adam Browning
Adam Stein
Alan Durning
Andrew Dessler
Andrew Sharpless
Ariane Lotti
Ben Tuxworth
biodiversivist
Brad Johnson
Coby Beck
Edward Mazria
Eric de Place
Erik Hoffner
Frank O'Donnell
Gar Lipow
Glenn Hurowitz
Guest author
Jason D Scorse
Jim Goodman
JMG
John McGrath
John McQuaid
Jon Rynn
Joseph Romm
Josh Dorner
Ken Ward
Kit Stolz
Laura Hess
Lisa J. Bunin
Lou Bendrick
Maywa Montenegro
Melinda Henneberger
Meredith Niles
Michael Hoexter
Michael Moynihan
Miles Grant
Sean Casten
Sharon Astyk
Steph Larsen
Stephanie Paige Ogburn
Summer Rayne Oakes
Thomas Dobbs
Van Jones
Zoe Bradbury


Get your industrial agrodiesel here

Profit motive is eating the planet

Posted by biodiversivist (Guest Contributor) at 10:51 AM on 18 Oct 2007

The opening of the Propel Biofuels public pump was a smallish affair. The crowd of about thirty people appeared to consist mostly of investors, public relations personnel, some alternative energy enthusiasts, lots of press, and at least one lawyer. Because of the twelve-hour notice, and because it was in the middle of the week, only two protesters made it.

There is going to be a bigger protest this Saturday (October 20), same place, same time (high noon, at the pump located at Bernie's Auto Repair -- see map). Keep in mind this will not be a protest against Bernie, but against industrial agrodiesel. The pump is self-serve and open to the public. Bernie's is closed on Saturdays.

Consider dropping by for an hour or so to support those willing to publicly protest the for-profit takeover of the biosphere. It is remarkable how much impact protests can have. Imagine what a big one would do. Al Gore has called for civil disobedience. Some think Al Gore should be arrested. In any case, I'll be there along with my hybrid electric bike. Drop by and say hello.

It seemed to me that there were two main goals at the opening:

  1. Genuflect to Cantwell, who from the tone of the speeches has single-handedly made this whole industrial agrodiesel boondoggle possible.
  2. Give the impression that their fuel will be made from sustainably grown local crops.

Now, I voted for Cantwell and would do so again in a heartbeat. It's not like she is the only politician in the country who has jumped on the biofuel bandwagon. Keep in mind that corn ethanol is king. Every presidential candidate is endorsing it. Biodiesel is small potatoes in comparison. In other words, a politician's endorsement of a given biofuel obviously does not mean it is a good thing. It just means it is a politically astute thing. We can't grow much corn in Washington State so our politicians are pushing biodiesel instead, unaware, or uncaring that it is even worse for the biosphere.

They had a Washington state farmer there who will be growing rapeseed for them (that's his God Bless America sticker). When asked, he told us that only about 1 percent of the fuel will come from Washington state. What better way to mollify critics than by blending in small amounts of more expensive local products? Now you can argue that at least you are trying and that in the future even more of it might be locally grown (by plowing up Conservation Reserve carbon sinks, of course).

Overall this is a positive thing. A few squeaking wheels have convinced them to distance themselves from both palm oil and soybeans. Unfortunately, as I mentioned in my earlier post, two studies have just been released suggesting that rapeseed cultivation or any fuel that causes grasslands or forests go under the plow elsewhere on the planet (to make up for the oil being diverted to our cars) is much worse than diesel.

These same squeaking wheels asking what happened to the whole "local thing" have also got them talking up the local, sustainable aspect of their product (although I don't recall hearing the words "1 percent" in any of the speeches). Cantwell's support was based on the idea that her voting constituency would grow these crops. On the other hand, this is just a state version of our federal farm welfare program. She will probably be happy as long as voters "think" it is being grown locally. Never mind that producing our own fuel makes about as much sense as building our own cars. If it were cost effective, we would.

At one point, and totally by coincidence, a beater biodiesel truck with maybe 10 biodiesel stickers plastered on it stopped at the corner belching smoke. I thought he was going to asphyxiate the crowd before the light turned. Nobody seemed to notice but me. Maybe they have been desensitized to the tell-tale smell of combusted biodiesel (or possibly I have become sensitized to it). In any case, I can always tell when a biodiesel car is within ten feet of me.

Although I was not handing out fliers or carrying a banner, I did end up talking with several people. Most were congenial and genuinely interested in hearing the other side of the biodiesel debate. One biodiesel enthusiast thought he would blindside Duff and myself when he said, "Okay, so how did you two get here, then?" Duff held up his bus pass, I pointed to my hybrid electric bike. The conversation ended very positively with a genuine handshake and shared smiles.

I had a total of two unfriendly conversations, both with people who were profiting from biodiesel peripherally. As a student of human nature, this does not surprise me. One guy in a dark suit jacket approached me (I happened to have my camera running and caught some of the conversation on tape) in an agitated state and asked, "What are you after here? What, what, what are you trying to get out of this?" I said, "The same thing as you, stop global warming and biodiversity loss." Turns out he was somebody's lawyer. He later threatened to kick me off the property if I continued to be disruptive. What was he going to do? Call the cops? That would have been a PR disaster. Not to mention that the cops probably would have showed up about an hour after everybody left. What I was doing that he considered disruptive, I have no idea. I was just answering a few questions and chatting away alongside Duff (holding the banner).

The other conversation that turned sour was with a public relations person. She must have said "Oh, come on!" a dozen times. She finally, literally and physically, backed out of the conversation. Picture that.

I don't run around trying to make people who disagree with me into evildoers. Everybody sees a well-meaning person in the bathroom mirror in the morning. I truly do not want to see all of these investors lose their shirts. Maybe they can get some government assistance like all of the farmers?

Poll
Which slogan works best for you?

Biofuels Kill
Industrial Agrofuels -- Feeding the Planet to Our Cars
Biofuels -- Destroying the Biosphere One Car at a Time
None of these. You are a shill for big oil and a bad person!

Votes: 40
Results

Interesting report, BioD

Thanks for the first-person account.

I'm worried, though, that as of writing this, almost one-quarter of the respondents to your poll clicked the button for "You are a shill for Big Oil and a bad person!"

These are only my personal opinions.

Frankly,

I'm surprised it's that low. I just finished a simple website that I'm hoping the general public can better understand. From the comments I've seen it is pretty obvious that numbers and even graphs are not cutting the mustard. I've moved to pictures and stick figures.

http://home.comcast.net/~russ676/biodiesel/bob.html

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world

That last option puts people between a rock and a

hard place. Enthusiasts will tell their buddies to go vote. The sudden upsurge for that choice will give it away but I had to wait for it to happen to mention it. The simple fact that they would call someone a shill for big oil and a bad person just for pointing out the negatives of biofuels made from industrial food crops is just what that option is meant to highlight. There are only two reasons to do so: ignorance and/or spite. People are frightening creatures.

If you want your country to use less oil, use less oil. Don't replace it with something scraped off the face of a planet in the throes of an extinction event that will soon have 50% more people on it and pretend all is right.

http://home.comcast.net/~russ676/biodiesel/page3.html


In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world

In defense of the accusers...

It is a very poorly written poll, there are three options one direction and only one clearly biased option in the other. It also doesn't take into account shades of gray like "only waste biodiesel should be used as fuel." If you create a "with us or against us" choice then people will naturally line up against you or with you. It's almost always a propaganda mistake.

Anyway, biofuels are generally a red herring and do not seem to be useful/sustainable for large global populations.

Better yet, they could have done what you did.

Discuss it. It also isn't a real poll. I don't like the "Biofuels Kill" slogan and was curious what others thought.

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks