Staff Contributors
Staff Contributors
Adam Browning
Adam Stein
Alan Durning
Andrew Dessler
Andrew Sharpless
Ariane Lotti
Ben Tuxworth
biodiversivist
Brad Johnson
Coby Beck
Edward Mazria
Eric de Place
Erik Hoffner
Frank O'Donnell
Gar Lipow
Glenn Hurowitz
Guest author
Jason D Scorse
Jim Goodman
JMG
John McGrath
John McQuaid
Jon Rynn
Joseph Romm
Josh Dorner
Ken Ward
Kit Stolz
Laura Hess
Lisa J. Bunin
Lou Bendrick
Maywa Montenegro
Melinda Henneberger
Meredith Niles
Michael Hoexter
Michael Moynihan
Miles Grant
Sean Casten
Sharon Astyk
Steph Larsen
Stephanie Paige Ogburn
Summer Rayne Oakes
Thomas Dobbs
Van Jones
Zoe Bradbury


Why are taxpayers funding a fringe right-wing blog?

Run out of a Senate committee, no less

Posted by David Roberts at 1:39 PM on 25 Jan 2007

Read more about: James Inhofe

Marc MoranoHow is it that taxpayers are funding what looks like an official Senate committee blog dispensing far-right agitprop? Here's the story.

Toward the middle of last year, then-chair of the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee James Inhofe (R-Okla.) hired Marc Morano as his communications director.

Morano is a long-time operative in right-wing media circles, known for his facility at injecting fringe talking points into the mainstream dialogue via friendly outlets like Fox News. He was known as Rush Limbaugh's "man in Washington" when he produced and reported for Limbaugh's TV show, and was a lead writer at hyper-conservative CNS News, where he played a crucial role in advancing the Swift Boat story slandering John Kerry and calling into question the Purple Hearts received by both Kerry and John Murtha.

As EPW communications director, Morano immediately began issuing press releases blasting any piece of reporting or commentary too friendly to the mainstream global warming consensus. The releases became steady fodder for right-wing blogs, talk radio, and cable news; Morano's readers took to descending on his every target with abuse and vitriol. (Heidi Cullen is the latest victim.)

In Dec., Morano set up a blog on the EPW site. Currently it is marked as the "minority blog" only on the EPW homepage. If readers are sent directly to the blog itself, or -- more likely -- directly to an individual post, there's no indication that the thoughts expressed do not represent the positions of the full committee. (Update [2007-1-25 14:21:4 by David Roberts]: Ah, it seems between the time I wrote this, early yesterday, and today, Morano's been forced to add an "Inhofe EPW Press Blog" banner at the top. Bully for him.) Suffice to say, the posts are in keeping with Morano's previous work, consisting primarily of attack politics and fringe, discredited scientific views.

I called the EPW to ask why the blog is not more clearly marked as belonging to the minority, and whether it's normal for a Senator to have his own in-house extremist blogger.

(Keep in mind that Boxer only officially took over the majority office about a week ago, so they aren't exactly settled in.)

Staffers there told me that Inhofe alone is legally responsible for the minority portions of the website, but that they are aware of concerns about the blog's lack of identification. They have made it clear to the minority communications staff that they would like to see it more conspicuously identified. Expeditiously. We'll see if and when that happens.

Majority staffers are in the midst of updating the EPW website and say it will soon offer a "different perspective," resources, tools for research, and a blog from Sen. Boxer.

Based on some informal asking around, it seems only two things are legally prohibited in official Committee communications: fundraising, and explicit campaigning on behalf of a candidate or piece of legislation. I'll leave it to legal experts to determine whether Inhofe's crossed that line, though he has reprinted editorials bashing Kyoto and inveighing against legislative limits on carbon emissions, and regularly attacks other legislators by name. It's not illegal, of course, to misrepresent science, which Morano has done regularly since he was hired. This, recall, from the Senate committee explicitly assigned to protect the environment.

Aside from the legal issues is the simple, strange fact that a United States Senator is using not his own website, or a PAC website, but the website of the committee he co-chairs to disseminate fringe right-wing talking points, hype companies from his home state, and attack his co-chair. My informal survey of other Senate committee sites turns up nothing comparable, and as far as I know no legislator is lending his or her name to an extreme ideological blog.

Morano's become the darling of the right-wing. His success pushing Inhofe's talking points will no doubt serve as an inspiration to other legislators and committee chairs. Perhaps they'll all fund in-house attack bloggers. Won't that be a dignified state of affairs for the U.S. Congress.

If you have thoughts about U.S. Senators using taxpayer money to fund fringe blogging, you can contact the EPW majority office at 202-224-8832.

knee-jerk denialism pays, apparently

If Morano is popular, it's because some simply don't want to face the facts, and couldn't possibly be convinced, and need some talking points to spout.

If you check Morano's site, you'll see he admits in a bland way that "the President is refering to global warming." He doesn't concede that anthropogenic global warming is a reality. He doesn't even accept that the  Republican establishment has in 2007 taken on "the serious challenge of global climate change." (Not because they intend to do anything about it as long as Bush is around, but simply because they don't want to look like total hypocrites when, as in California, they decide to move seriously later.)

Amazing that he can make a living this way.  

God job, Dave

I've also made some comments to Boxer.  The blog should be clearly noted as a "minority" one, all other minority content should be labelled as such (not solely in the url)(for now, they just laod under the main committee banner), and white papers (his climate science one, for example) and the like that name Inhofe as the chairman should be pulled down or dated.

Swiftboater has Bigger fish To fry!

I too have been extremely troubled by this TAXPAYER FUNDED! indeed, propogandising right from the Senator's office, and diaried about what we can do about it at dailykos:

Returning Fire in The War On Science
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/1/25/103457/239

...

not to pimp so much as to increase the visibility googlewise, as this issue definitely needs more sunlight.

John McCain already vetoes every eco bill

Well,

Asked the same question 1/20.  I think a lot of people did.

Climate Change and the U.S. Senate

The U.S. Senate has no interest in seeing any climate change legislation or treaty come their way.  The Byrd-Hagel Resolution of July 25, 1997 that said Kyoto was unacceptable passed 95-0.  That is zero nay votes.

The climate change issue ranks up there with abortion and social security as something to steer clear of.

Would you tell a constituent that the U.S. has to trash its economy but China, India, and developing nations get a free pass?  Their opponent in an election is going to make sure this factoid is not forgotten.

Now the question everyone should be asking is why business is suddenly interested in climate change, and climate gets mentioned in the State of the Union address.

Business "demands action".  The only off-the-shelf technology available today is nuclear energy.  Nuclear reduces imports of middle east oil, and solves a big nat'l security problem.  Nuclear is clean and emits no CO2 (and no SO2, mercury, dioxins, etc.).

So there you have it.  With nuclear, the U.S. reduces dependence on foreign oil imports, improves nat'l security, provides clean energy, and puts environmental activists in a real bind.  

If climate change is really as important as activists say, they have to rollover on nuclear.  If activists block nuclear, then climate change maybe wasn't important in the first place.

Business looks environmentally correct, gets a stable energy supply (that happens to be clean), and gets to bash activists.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks