Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Starbucks: only green on their logo?

Coffee giant may be involved in deforestation in Indonesia

Posted by Sarah K. Burkhalter at 12:41 PM on 08 Sep 2006

For being a big-ass chain, Starbucks Coffee at least has a reputation as a socially responsible big-ass chain.

They've partnered with Conservation International for their Conservation Coffee program, "to encourage environmentally sound coffee-growing practices and to improve farmer livelihoods" in Mexico, Colombia, Peru, "and other Conservation Coffee™ sites around the world" that apparently don't warrant mentioning.

They recycle "at 1,544 of our stores, of which 61 percent have a recycling program." (Side note: I'm spoiled here in hippie Seattle, but it's depressing that there are Starbucks stores "located in communities where commercial recycling facilities are not available.")

They've got a composting program, Environmental Footprint Team, and green thoughts about store design and operations.

But then there's this (it's from April -- you know, I've been busy):

According to an article in the business section of the Jakarta Post, PT. Sarimakmur Tunggalmandiri has signed an agreement with a U.S. based international coffeehouse chain and a company from Japan to jointly develop a 3,000-hectare coffee plantation in Dairi regency, North Sumatra.

Suryo Pranoto, the president of PT Sarimakmur, said in Jakarta on Monday that the total investment in the plantation project would amount to about Rp 250 billion (US$27.78 million).

"We've received approval from the local government. Now we're waiting for the Forestry Ministry to approve our request to be allowed to clear 3,000 hectares of forest for the coffee plantation," Suryo told The Jakarta Post on Monday.

He refused, however, to name the overseas partners. But sources say that one of the two foreign firms is U.S.-based Starbucks.

Anyone have an inside scoop?

No

But I hope someone outs them. There are more than enough coffee plantations on this planet.

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
No, with caveats

I did a little research for ya -- It appears that Starbucks at least isn't DIRECTLY behind this project.

As to whether Starbucks could take a bigger responsibility to prevent deforestation in Sumatra: That's a bigger issue, and one that Starbucks carries at least some blame for --

http://greenlagirl.com/

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks