Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

New Bush climate policy on the way?

Rumblings have started.

Posted by David Roberts at 4:07 PM on 14 Sep 2006

What's this all about?

The Bush administration plans to announce as early as next week a goal of stabilizing carbon dioxide levels in the global atmosphere at 450 parts per million by the year 2106, congressional and non-government sources told Platts Wednesday.

Such an announcement, if true, might lead to the establishment of new regulatory policies -- either voluntary or mandatory -- for the power sector and other sources of CO2 emissions.

But a high-ranking source at the White House Council on Environmental Quality rejected the suggestion, saying the administration has no plans to unveil any new climate-change policies.

Also this, from EE News (sub.):

President Bush's top environmental adviser urged reporters today to "stay tuned" for new U.S. climate change policies and refused to tamp down speculation that major new proposals may be coming before Bush leaves office in January 2009.

Both these come via Roger.

As Coby points out in the thread below, the goal (450ppb by 2106) makes no sense. If atmospheric concentrations of CO2 rise above 450ppb -- as virtually everyone expects them to -- they will take centuries to sink back down again (absent some sort of high-tech widget that sucks CO2 directly from the air).

So if you really want to stabilize at 450ppb, that means never going above 450 ppb, and that in turn means cutting emissions by 60-80%, and soon. I highly doubt that's what the Bush folks have in mind.

Anyway, it's starting to seem like some sort of policy announcement is in the offing. Like the man said, stay tuned.

What's the rush?

2106. Wow. That's good stuff.

Victual Reality
"Sources"

Almost sounds vaguely Yes Men-ish ...

Frequently asked technical questions about Grist's newsletters and website.
100 Years of Solitude?

I'm sure we'll all be amazed by whatever comes out.

Sucking CO2 would not be tech widgets' province

It would be done by covering square miles of desert with quicklime, and occasionally taking it up and calcining it. The pure CO2 from the calciner could, perhaps, be frozen in lumps big enough to sink to the bottom of the Pacific, and sunk there, or made into nuclear gasoline, or combined with the mineral serpentinite.

As a public works project, correcting the atmosphere's surfeit of CO2 isn't out of reach.

--- G. R. L. Cowan, former hydrogen fan
How internal combustion gains nuclear cachet

Promise Breaker

The current administration already reneged once on a campaign pledge to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. Is anyone going to be suckered into a bait-and-switch a second time?

In addition, this may well be a delaying tactic designed to convince states to hold off on substantive action until the feds come riding to the rescue. After enough years have passed, a convenient pretext will be worked up to renege yet again.

Ped Shed Blog

hmmm

The Bush administration plans to announce as early as next week a goal of stabilizing carbon dioxide levels in the global atmosphere at 450 parts per million by the year 2106, congressional and non-government sources told Platts Wednesday.

I can't find the link right now, but I'm pretty sure that this had its origins in an article in The Onion.  Of course, The Onion really has become one of the more reliable news sources in recent times.

More "evidence" from Time mag

What do you make of this passage in 9/4 Time magazine?

Previewing the final quarter of Bush's presidency, officials disclosed to Time that the Administration is formulating a huge energy initiative designed to "change the whole nature of the discussion" and challenge the Republican Party, Democrats, the oil and electricity industries, and environmentalists. An  adviser said Bush's views about global warming had evolved. "Only Nixon could go to China, and only Bush and Cheney -- two oilmen -- can bring all these parties kicking and screaming to the table," the adviser said.

Tom Belford TheAgitator.net

SOU Timing

From another recent article:

The White House... did not deny that a change of policy was on its way. Sources say that the most likely moment is the President's State of the Union address in January.


Ped Shed Blog
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks