Staff Contributors
Staff Contributors
Adam Browning
Adam Stein
Alan Durning
Andrew Dessler
Andrew Sharpless
Ariane Lotti
Ben Tuxworth
biodiversivist
Brad Johnson
Coby Beck
Edward Mazria
Eric de Place
Erik Hoffner
Frank O'Donnell
Gar Lipow
Glenn Hurowitz
Guest author
Jason D Scorse
Jim Goodman
JMG
John McGrath
John McQuaid
Jon Rynn
Joseph Romm
Josh Dorner
Ken Ward
Kit Stolz
Laura Hess
Lisa J. Bunin
Lou Bendrick
Maywa Montenegro
Melinda Henneberger
Meredith Niles
Michael Hoexter
Michael Moynihan
Miles Grant
Sean Casten
Sharon Astyk
Steph Larsen
Stephanie Paige Ogburn
Summer Rayne Oakes
Thomas Dobbs
Van Jones
Zoe Bradbury


Poll: Do you trust Wal-Mart?

Posted by Chris Schults (Guest Contributor) at 10:42 AM on 11 Aug 2006

Read more about: Wal-Mart

According to these comments and the letters to the editor, there seems to be a bunch of you who don't believe Wal-Mart is actually going to implement their sustainability plans. I think it is time for a Friday poll! (Vote below the fold.)

Poll
Do you trust Wal-Mart to follow through with its sustainability initiatives?

Yes
No
Not sure

Votes: 74
Results

Horizon milk as a Wal-Mart Microcosm

Seattle Times has article today that local food co-op, PCC, is dropping Horizon so-called "organic" milk. This is very much like the Wal-Mart scenario: Horizon starts out small with good intentions, but as it scales it simply has to "game the system" (as quoted in story) to meet economies of scale.

More on my blog but read this before you vote on Chris' poll!

Paul Andrews

Paul Andrews, editorial director, GreenForGood.com

mistrust

On Tuesday the 8th, my husband, Little White Dog and I happened to be motoring back to our home in NYC through, of all places, the great state of Connecticut.  And between stops at numerous polling places, at which we begged in vain to be allowed to vote (no, that is not true; ha ha), we were listening to NPR.  And, mid-afternoonish, we heard an interesting interview with Michael Pollan, who was of course being asked about "Omnivore's Dilemma."

He said nothing especially new, but he said it rather more succinctly.  Regarding Whole Foods, he said he thought his exchange with the founder/boss there (what's his name, Mackey?) was good and fruitful.  He said he appreciates their resolution to do more to buy local, and especially their creation of a fund (did I get this right?) to benefit local farmers (sounds good, but details are unclear).  And he seems to believe they have taken him seriously when he criticized them for not investigating the "free range" claim of their suppliers.  And he seems to trust them that they will continue to insist on a high standard for the designation "organic."

Wal-Mart, on the other hand, he mistrusts.  In fact, he seems to believe that Wal-Mart's lobbyists are already working for the legislative weakening of "organic" standards.

As for Al Gore, I have no idea what that man is up to now.  I really really want to trust him, but he is not making it easy.  Does he honestly think that Wal-Mart can qualify as "green," while still maintaining their business pattern of huge buildings built in the center of immense parking lots?  That might work in rural counties, but hardly anywhere else.

And what about the notoriously low salaries and poor benefits afforded to the "associates"?  Did Al compromise himself there too?  Or did his visitation aboard the mother-ship in Arkansas come only at the cost to Wal-Mart of giving everybody a big raise, plus medical benefits for them and their families, plus the freedom to join a union?

And did Al have anything to say to all those owners of small stores across the country, whom competition with Wal-Mart drove out of business?

I remain grateful, that I still have Michael Pollan to trust, and Amanda Griscom Little.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

Applause, but keep your hand on your wallet

"Trust"  and "distrust" are concepts that only make sense with individuals and small groups.  Wal-mart is a huge corporation that acts as large political and economic entities do.

I trust them to try to maximize profits, and to  burnish their image through public relations rather than reality - simply because it makes more economic sense.

On the other hand, corporations will often respond to legal and public pressures if they see it is in their own interest.  

So dealing with Wal-mart is like any political process:

  • Understand one's own goals
  • Understand what makes the other party tick
  • Develop a strategy so you get what you want


Bart
Energy Bulletin
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks