Staff Contributors
Staff Contributors
Adam Browning
Adam Stein
Alan Durning
Andrew Dessler
Andrew Sharpless
Ariane Lotti
Ben Tuxworth
biodiversivist
Brad Johnson
Coby Beck
Edward Mazria
Eric de Place
Erik Hoffner
Frank O'Donnell
Gar Lipow
Glenn Hurowitz
Guest author
Jason D Scorse
Jim Goodman
JMG
John McGrath
John McQuaid
Jon Rynn
Joseph Romm
Josh Dorner
Ken Ward
Kit Stolz
Laura Hess
Lisa J. Bunin
Lou Bendrick
Maywa Montenegro
Melinda Henneberger
Meredith Niles
Michael Hoexter
Michael Moynihan
Miles Grant
Sean Casten
Sharon Astyk
Steph Larsen
Stephanie Paige Ogburn
Summer Rayne Oakes
Thomas Dobbs
Van Jones
Zoe Bradbury


Deactivated cylinders

Posted by biodiversivist (Guest Contributor) at 11:24 PM on 08 Jun 2006

The competition to own the biggest truck on the block has finally reached its zenith. The Detroit News tells us that pickup truck sales continue to "crater."

GM and Ford Motor Co. announced plans to cut North American vehicle output in the third quarter to pare their stocks of unsold [pickup] trucks.

"That market is sitting back a bit," said Gary Dilts, senior vice president of sales at DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group. "But the core of the truck business -- a very large percentage -- will remain, because they need that kind of vehicle."

Garbage in = garbage out. A small percentage of people who buy these trucks actually need them.

GM's Ballew said the automaker needed to better explain the fuel-saving technologies it has developed, such as engines that deactivate some cylinders when full power isn't needed. "That's not as easy to communicate as saying, 'I've got a (Toyota) Prius,'." he said.

Just imagine that you are at a party when some guy walks up and says,

"My full-sized pickup has fuel-saving technology in the form of an engine that can deactivate some cylinders when full power isn't needed, hic."

You take a sip of your beer and say, "I've got a Prius."

He says, "Hell, every guy has got one of those, hic."

"I said Prius, not..."

A woman suddenly pops out of your beer and says, "You are a buffet of manliness."

You have a sudden urge to eat a candy bar. Hey, advertising works.

I was watching parents pick up their kids at a private school the other day. One giant SUV after another rolled up -- expensive ones like the Cadillac Escalade and Toyota Land Cruiser. At one point, there were three in a row, each driven by a petite mom with one hand on the steering wheel (which they could not turn without power steering) and the other on a cell phone. If they only new how ridiculous they looked sitting atop these behemoths, at least to me.

Calling these Sport/Utility vehicles was a marketing coupe. These women wouldn't be caught dead in a utility vehicle. However, a sport vehicle portrays an image of leisure, wealth, and health. Never mind that there are no sports you can do in one of these cars. Driving to a ski lodge doesn't count.

They are just as susceptible to subliminal cues as to what is cool as the rest of us. Depending on your peers, tattoos and piercings may be cool, or business suits and ties. This is what we are. Using guilt to change behavior has its limits. The environmental movement should know this after thirty or so years of trying to change people's behavior with that tactic.

Changing the subliminal messages that tell us what is cool would work a lot better. Detroit is doing everything it can to plant the message that driving great big trucks and cars that have the potential to run on ethanol is not only cool, it's green. It is pretty much up to the blogosphere to say that it isn't. Which means that people who only watch TV are going to continue to buy big trucks and cars equipped to run on ethanol right up until their fuel bills eat their car payments.

Blacklisted

I've been blacklisted from GM's Fastlane and FYI blogs for pointing these things out.

I take it as a compliment.

That's funny

This is a real downside to blogs. They can be used to mine for postive feedback, filtering out critique. I visited a blog the other day where a guy had actually written "hear no evil" software that checked for critical commnets. For example, the site was about his "cool" house (gouged out of a forest). If you used the words "not cool" in the title of your post, it was all over and you were automatically blocked for good. Maybe GM should write a program like that. Better yet, just write one that generates positive comments and emails them to the blog.

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
saw a commercial last night

Had a big GM (i think) truck rolling consequently through a construction site, 'Panama canal' dig, large sport complex construction, all that jazz. At the end, the narrator said: "While you may not be the person who works on these (or not tough enough or something), this truck could." Edit to an average-looking guy with a child standing by him looking at it as if it were a movie screen.

Umm, why the hell would he want to spend a ton of money in order to have a truck that he won't use? To make him LOOK manly? How pathetic do the ad people think that the average viewers are? Or are the viewers pathetic enough to actually buy into the entire idea? Or when did the size of your truck start to make up for a lack of size down there? Or a complete lack of muscles? Why not buy a sports car instead, those are definitely bigger chick magnets, or if married why do any of this? Psychologists definitely did a good job of permeating the ad space to work on human insecurities.

When you see ads using "manliness"

   You should (if male) immediately fire off a letter to the company and rage at them "How dare you suggest I am not manly if I don't buy your product.  If your product is so poor that you have to resort to this kind of cheap pyschological manipulation to sell it, then I don't want anything to do with your product or your company.  Good day."

   If enough men did this (women might do the same thing, replacing the first sentence with "How dare you suggest my husband/boyfriend (whatever) is not manly if he doesn't buy your product"), then perhaps we would begin to see the end of this kind of advertising on television.

   Instead of trying to emulate this, we should be seeking to end it.  It is not only advertising, but the creation of "values" that serve only the god of consumption.  We need to change our cultural values, and these ads are the enemy.

Patrick

Fight fire with fire

We all get our subliminal clues as to what is cool from our culture. Combing our hair and wearing clean clothes is a sign that we want people to think highly of us. You can't change that behavior. What you can change is what is cool by changing the subliminal clues. Messy hair is cool in a lot of circles. Make biking, small homes, and small cars cool. One way to do that is with ads.

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks