Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Chafee insures Wehrum confirmation; Roberts insures enduring shame

Posted by David Roberts at 2:51 PM on 26 Apr 2006

Looks like it's crow-eating time for yours truly. A while back I defended the Sierra Club's decision to endorse Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-RI). Then last week, to make matters worse, I smugly implied that enviros should be thankful that Chafee's around, because he might save us from Bush's nominee to head air-pollution programs at EPA, the stinktastic William Wehrum.

Well, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee voted to confirm Wehrum, on a strict party-line vote. The vote count was 10-8; Chafee cast the key pro-confirmation vote.

So much for that theory!

(h/t to FO at Clean Air Watch)

Don't be hard on yourself

I don't live anywhere near RI, and I almost always vote for democrats.  However, I'm still happy that Chafee is around.  He is one of a few republicans still around that have an green ethics.  Sure, RI voters could replace him with a greener democrat, but  as the last of the moderate republicans get voted out of office, environmental issues will be seen and treated in an even more partisan light.  

People like Chafee are a voice of moderation for the republican party (even if not on this particular vote).  I'm still glad he is there.  In the latest LCV scorecard, he was graded out at 90%.  In the latest Wilderness Report Card (www.americanwilderness.org) he got an A-.  

I live in southeastern Iowa.  My representative is Jim Leach, a green-leaning republican.  I sometimes here other environmentalists voice frustration with Leach on a particular issue and talk about getting a democrat in his seat.  I remind them to continue encouraging Leach to be greener, but that environmental issues will not be solved automatically in this country by putting more democrats in office.  If they force Leach out, the short term gain might be great.  But eventually, the district will put another republican in, and then it might be an anti-environmentalist.  

In short, moderate green republicans protect us by fending off the less desirable elements of their party.  I might be wrong, but I would imagine that the same might be true with Chafee and Rhode Island.  Lets work to make environmental issues LESS partisan, not more.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks