|
Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors
|
||||
Taking back the initiativesTakings initiatives die deserved deathPosted by Eric de Place (Guest Contributor) at 3:01 PM on 08 Nov 2006Five outta six ain't bad.
As I mentioned earlier, the takings measures in Montana and Nevada were yanked by the courts. Then last night, the good news just kept on coming. Voters in three Western states -- California, Idaho, and Washington -- soundly rejected ballot measures that aimed to hamstring local governments and cripple environmental protections. It wasn't close. In most places voter's message was deafening: we want to protect our communities and our natural heritage.
The only blot on the otherwise wholesale rejection was Arizona, where Proposition 207 appears to have won -- 65 (yes) to 35 (no). Opponents there had to struggle against an unbelievably crowded ballot and the usual deceptive tactics of anti-government mogul Howie Rich and his minions. The "property rights" movement isn't going away. But last night's elections dealt them a crushing blow. They'll be forced now to contend with the fact that the overwhelming majority of Americans, even in conservative states (and perhaps especially so), value local decision-making and want to respect natural limits. November 2006 will mark a time when communities chose to preserve their traditions of local decision-making. These ballot measures were incredibly dangerous. So we should be clear that their defeat is a victory for democracy at its most elemental level.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
|
sign in
Search Gristmill
Using Gristmill
Recent Comments
|
|||