Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Fish story

Worldwatch releases a hopeful plan for saving the world's fish.

Posted by Tom Philpott at 10:28 AM on 07 Nov 2006

Read more about: food | fishing | oceans

There's no shortage of reasons it would really suck if present trends continued and the world's oceans stopped supporting a robust fish population.

For one, it would deal a devastating blow to human nutrition and cuisine. The sea provides us with high-quality protein and many other valuable nutrients. Poof? Gone? (Don't be smug, vegans. Fish emulsion -- ground-up fish -- is a common and valuable input for organic vegetable farming.)

As for cuisine, can anyone really bear to contemplate Southeast Asian food without fish? Then there's Italian. No spaghetti alle vongole (clams)? Or that immortal Sicilian dish, pasta con sarde (sardines)? What, the southern French won't get to make bouillabaisse, the Basques will be robbed of their cod, the coastal Mexicans can no longer do hauchinango al mojo de ajo (garlic-crusted red snapper)? What will become of Vera Cruz? Of New Orleans?

No. This is wholly unacceptable. It won't do. Such a world does not interest me. Present trends must not continue; they must end immediately.

Thank God, Worldwatch Institute has come out with a plan promising a way out of this abyss.

Happily, Worldwatch isn't ordering us to immediately stop consuming seafood (though if that were the only way to preserve the oceans' long-term status as a food source, I'd be on board).

The report claims that through smarter fishing and careful stewardship, active human intervention can restore the health of the sea and its precious creatures. What we have here is what the economists call a colossal "market failure"; what's needed is swift, draconian, and concerted government action, backed by enlightened consumer choice.

According to Worldwatch, the report shows that "that being a more deliberate seafood eater doesn't mean a spartan existence; in fact, it could be the only guarantee that fresh and healthy fish continues to appear on our tables."

Like the guy says at the end of The Sun Also Rises, "Isn't it pretty to think so?"

smug


I'd rather that fish were not killed to grow my vegetables.  I prefer my fish alive.  

There's certainly nothing wrong...

... with not eating fish. I salute you, Pandu. It was I who was being smug. Now the task is to convince the fish eaters among us to eat less and lower on the food chain.

Victual Reality
The why and how

Thanks for posting on this, Tom. Looks like the Worldwatch report you link to explains the "why." For consumers standing at grocery fish counters and sitting in front of restaurant menus wondering about the "how," I recommend Monterey Bay Aquarium's Seafood Watch program. You can even print a pocket-sized guide to take with you wherever seafood choices may arise.

Are YOU on The List?
Tom....

A couple quick thoughts...

  1. First off, while I respect everyone's taste I not only can envision, but I love a world without seafood, in which my culinary palate reaches the highest heights every day without having to leave a trail of destruction in its wake

  2. While there are no doubt some examples of "sustainable" seafood it is stil one of the most energy-intensive products (deep-sea fish is equivalent in energy to industrial beef) and marine ecosystems invariably get harmed and marine mammals and other creatures killed in the process- in addition, certification is still sketchy at best

  3. So while people are free to eat what they want don't fool yourself into thinking that seafood can be free of serious ecological harm- and it never will be

J.S.

Economic Illiteracy Harms The Planet! www.voicesofreason.info.
Vegans and fish

Curse you! I was ready to take you task until you responded to Pandu. As you probably figured, organic agriculture can find other inputs after the fish are gone, but none of us wants to see our oceans emptied, whether we care about fish or, in your case, simply want to eat them.

Seeing as how we don't need to eat fish (despite their many health benefits, regardless of mercury contamination), it seems to me quitting fish is a good idea. Get those Omega 3's from canola, walnuts, flax seed, or even supplements. I looked up NuTru's Omega 3 supplement, and one of those pills, while expensive, is way cheaper than fish flesh.

"The choice thoughtful people face is not between helping humans or helping other animals. One can do both." -- Tom Regan

I printed one of those out, Sarah

I finally decided it was just easier to swear off salt water fish.

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
O radiant Hecate, forfend the malediction!

Gosh, Tom, I am torn between you and Pandu.

In a nostalgia-for-Camelot kind of way, it is important to give testimony to cuisine experiences that may soon pass away.  Of course that is a less important consideration than the practical and unaesthetic one, that seafood is a major source of nutrition for a large part of humanity.  Still, aesthetics should never be neglected or undervalued.

In fact, I almost never eat seafood anymore.  Thanks, Sarah, for mentioning the Monterey Bay Aquarium's little guide.  We have a copy, stuck to our refrigerator with a magnet that looks like a white duck, but I cannot remember the last time I referred to it.

Nevertheless, I have many fond memories of eating seafood: tuna in various forms, salmon, swordfish, my grandmother's anchovy pizza, crabcake, the kalamarakia at a Greek restaurant that we like ...  It is probably fair to say that the meals that have given me the greatest pleasure, based on exquisite taste alone, have involved fish.

And yet, curiously, all that is now gone.  Not because of any principle that I have adopted, but rather, more mysteriously, at this stage of my life the fish seem not to swim onto my table.

Just as well, though, in view of this discouraging report.

Thanks, Epskionline, for the recommendation of NuTru's Omega 3 supplement.  Apparently, from what you write, it is made from vegetable sources, not from fish, no?

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

Look at a map of the world...

How much water do you see? 75% and climbing. Doesn't it seem that the sea is something to work with, as we creep our way to ultimate sustainability. In a world whose human footprint is rapidly expanding, I think it's foolish to turn our backs on any source of food, let alone the sea, which supports some of the most productive areas on Earth.

I'm not apologising for the status quo. It's a major problem. But the answer, as for most things, isn't just to avoid it. And I don't mean just because the problem isn't going away (which it's not); I mean I think that things--everything--are better seen as opportunities than crises. Just because the methods we use are unsustainable today, doesn't mean they can't be tomorrow.

Of course you can make an ethical decision not to eat fish today, if you perceive your presence in the market to be more a part of the problem than the solution. But I personally think that a solution is both necessary and good, so I won't be turning my back on fish... In other words, I seem to agree completely with the flesh and flavour of this report.

Right on, Jones

Let's not be too cavalier about discarding 1000s of years of tradition. Just as beef consumption can be disastrous, innocuous or even beneficial, so, perhaps, can fish eating.
And remember, food is what tethers us to the earth and the sea. By appealing to people's senses, we might convince more to care about eco issues than we do by appealing to their sense of duty.

Victual Reality
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks