Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Senators write a letter to the President

Dear Sir, you know about that global warming thing?

Posted by Maywa Montenegro (Guest Contributor) at 9:12 AM on 16 Nov 2006

U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), and Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) yesterday sent the following letter to President George W. Bush, asking him to commit to working with the new Congress to pass meaningful climate change legislation in 2007.

The Senators are the incoming chairs of three important Senate committees on global warming: Boxer in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee; Bingaman in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee; and Lieberman in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

The senators' letter to the President follows:

November 15, 2006

The President
The White House
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. President:

As you know, diplomats representing 189 countries, including the United States, are now in Nairobi, Kenya discussing the most pressing environmental issue currently facing mankind: human-induced global warming. Unfortunately, we have not been satisfied with the level of U.S. participation in the international negotiations or in reducing our own domestic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Therefore, as incoming Chairs of three important Senate Committees on global warming, we seek your commitment to work with the new Congress to pass meaningful climate change legislation in 2007. The U.S. must move quickly to adopt economy-wide constraints on domestic GHG emissions and then work with the international community to forge an effective and equitable global agreement.

Scientists are now warning that we may be reaching a "tipping point" beyond which it will be extremely difficult, or perhaps impossible, to avoid the worst consequences of climate change. If the world continues on its current path of emissions increases, we could risk global climatic disasters on an unprecedented scale, ranging from dangerous sea level rise, to increasingly damaging hurricanes (such as Hurricanes Katrina and Rita), increased deaths from air pollution and disease, to widespread geo-political instability. A recent report by Sir Nicholas Stern finds that leaving climate change unchecked could cost between 5%-20% of global GDP.

As United States Senators, we have all authored or co-sponsored legislation to combat global warming. Although our approaches differ slightly, we-along with the overwhelming majority of the scientific community, agree that human caused global warming is real and that we must pass legislation to address this threat. We are committed to achieving this result.

As you know, in addition to our proposed bills, on June 22, 2005, the United States Senate went on record for the first time in bipartisan support of mandatory limits on greenhouse gases by a vote 53-44. We have good reason to believe that the number of Senators in support of such legislation is now even larger than that vote demonstrated.

The recent elections have signaled a need to change direction in many areas, including global warming. If we are to leave our children a world that resembles the earth we inherited, we must act now to address GHG emissions. When the 110th Congress begins in January, we pledge to work to pass an effective system of mandatory limits on greenhouse gases.

We urge you to work with us to reach this result and to signal to the world that global warming legislation is on the way.

Respectfully,

Senator Barbara Boxer
Senator Jeff Bingaman
Senator Joseph Lieberman

Now, according to No Se Nada, the problem is how to get this plea beyond some major obstacles -- namely, the House chairmen -- and onto the President's desk. For instance, John Dingell, who will chair the House Energy and Commerce Committee, is known for his chumminess with the auto industry.

Still, this is good news from Capitol Hill ... where the climate, I hope, has changed for the better.

Let's wait un 08 when the Dems

are in charge of everything- which is probably the setup here

J.S. htt://voicesofreason.info
08 is too late

I disagree, it took Nixon to unfreeze China (not to mention create the EPA) and it took Clinton to reform welfare...it just might (gulp) take Bush to save the planet.  Nixon could talk to Communist china during the cold war because of his nationalist and foreign policy credentials.  Clinton was able to institute needed welfare reform because, as a Democrat, those interested in welfare trusted him to make changes toward improving and streamlining rather than cutting welfare.  Bush is obviously (and for good reason) trusted by Big Oil and the Energy industry - the two organized interests most obstructive to global warming policy.  Those with vested interests in a particular policy (Cold War hawks for Nixon, welfare advocates for Clinton) must trust the executive who is trying to affect reasonable and positive change in that area.  Oil trusts Bush, if he can be pressed with effective and well-concieved legislation, he just might realize that his presidential legacy would be well served by an about-face on this issue.  

Not Waiting


  Hey, if Bush would get serious about global warming, we could name the Washington Airport after him, and anything else he wants... (and I ALWAYS bash Bush every chance I get).

  Waiting is foolish, and many of the Democrats are clueless.  A letter signed by roughly six percent of their senate members is not particularly meaningful.

  Couldn't they at least get McCain or some other ambitious 2008 Repub contender to sign?

patrick

If you think bush is going to sign

a real comprehensive climate bill i have a bridge on sale- and we might only get 1 shot to do this right so i don't think this is a good idea at all

J.S. htt://voicesofreason.info
Even if we got a Veto...

It would lay everyone's cards on the table. Until now Bush has gotten away with all this obfuscation, keeping his stand low profile. Saying vague, happy things (in accord with the Luntz memo) and doing nothing. He says all these vaguaries and then on the down low muzzles James Hanson and meets with Michael Crichton.

If this were the first veto of his presidency, the issue would be front and center, and the Republicans' attitudes would be as well. That would be good.

Bush's style

Bash away, dear Patrick.  I agree with Jason, that this has more to do with the leading Democrats trying to position themselves well for 2008, rather than actually hoping to accomplish something, come January.  Bush's style is never to concede that he was wrong, and the Senators who signed the letter know that as well as anyone.  And whenever he does something that pleases environmentalists -- actually, I can only think of the creation of the marine sanctuary NW of Hawaii -- , he chooses an area that few people had at the top of their environmental agenda, so that he looks original and brilliant.  So, it is difficult to imagine him doing anything serious about carbon emissions; he would think it looks like he is caving in to pressure from his critics, something he could not abide.

Here, again, is the NY Times article, about the international meeting in Nairobi, that is summarized in Daily Grist:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/16/world/16climate.html?ex...

I suppose Kofi Annan could not directly say that he had the US in mind, when he criticized the "leadership" of certain countries.  Diplomats do not do that.

But the response of the US delegation, to the effect that Of course, Annan was not referring to the US!, is extremely disspiriting.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

The party is over

  My dear CanisCandida, back to the barricades!

patrick

Ohhh, shocking

Washington Rejects Senators' Calls on Climate Caps

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks