Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Reaction to the energy bill from the Apollo Alliance

Turns out the Apollo folks don't like it either

Posted by David Roberts at 11:01 AM on 28 Jul 2005

Beneath the fold is an op-ed written in reaction to the energy bill by Robert Borosage and Joel Rogers. Borosage is co-director of the Campaign for America's Future and co-founder, with Rogers, of the Apollo Alliance.

Gas prices are up. Demand for oil is up. Americans are dying in Iraq, and dependence on Persian Gulf oil is up. Even the president agrees that catastrophic climate change is a real and present danger. America needs a crash program to achieve energy independence. Instead, the energy bill now pending before the Congress displays an abject failure of leadership. New energy for America? Not in this bill.

Our current path is unsustainable. Global competition for oil is soaring while we're growing ever more dependent on foreign oil - importing over 13.2 million barrels a day. This bill does nothing to reduce that dependence. American soldiers are mired in a war in the region vital to that supply. Imported oil contributes to our unsustainable trade deficits, now over 1.9 billion dollars a day. Over half our water ways are polluted. Children in cities suffer staggering rates of asthma. We're shipping good jobs abroad. We have to change course.

The Apollo Alliance has outlined a ten-step national agenda of strategic planning and investment that drive for energy independence by the year 2015.

It is hard to overstate the benefits of such a project: 3 million new jobs and more than a trillion dollars in new economic activity, the public revenue from which would easily offset project costs. Such a project would bring jobs to our cities through planning, efficiency and conservation projects. The increased domestic manufacturing generated by such an investment could revitalize a Midwest badly in need of jobs. And alternative fuels and transportation technologies would breathe new life into Detroit and the Great Plains. Not to mention the untold environmental and health benefits of cleaner air and water and more hospitable work and living environments.

The Apollo Alliance has united a broad coalition around these goals, from labor leaders to business executives; from the environmental and civil-rights communities, to urban and rural constituencies and their elected leaders.

But new energy for America requires leadership -- and in this energy bill, the president and the Congress have punted. Instead of rallying the nation to a serious agenda, this bill is a shameless concoction of special interest subsidies, largely to big oil and gas producers that actually will leave us more dependent on foreign oil. The president and the Congress had the opportunity to provide good jobs here, put America into the lead in the growth green markets of the future, give our children cleaner water and air, and protect our national security. Instead, they chose business as usual.

It seems likely that the conference report on the Energy Bill will propose a tax package of $11.5 billion. The amount is insufficient to tackle our energy challenges in any significant way. Worse still, nearly $3 billion of that tax package will go to sustain oil and gas companies in importing and processing foreign oil, rather than spurring the development of alternative fuels, renewable sources, energy efficiency and advanced technologies that would make us energy independent.

Whether this bill passes or not, Congress will have to go back to the drawing board next year -- and that will take presidential leadership that is sorely lacking.

With the president's default, our best hope rests with the states and municipalities. Already, progressive governors and state legislators have started to pass groundbreaking state legislation that lowers our energy consumption, creates jobs, increases our security, and better maintains the health of our environment and our children.

In April, Washington Governor Christine Gregoire signed into law State Senate Bill 5509 making Washington State the first state in the country to adopt high performance green building standards for all state funded buildings over 5,000 square feet. The measure, passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, will lower the public sector's energy demands and costs, create a healthier environment for students and workers, and add new higher-skilled jobs in the construction industry.

Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell, recently signed Pennsylvania's Advanced Energy Portfolio Standard which requires 18 percent of the state's energy to come from clean or renewable sources. Aside from diversifying Pennsylvania's energy resources this measure will cut energy costs, encourage technological development and promote economic growth, vital for the state's beleaguered manufacturing sector. Results have been quick to follow. Already the Spanish aeronautics and wind power company Gamesa has announced plans to locate 18 new wind farms in the Commonwealth in addition to its North American headquarters and a new manufacturing facility.

Still other states and regions are pioneering new ways to engage and tackle the complexities of a changing energy landscape. The Apollo Alliance is driving an effort to line up broad political support across constituencies by building coalitions of labor, environmentalists, urban leaders and business to help move state and urban agendas.

The original Apollo project was launched by President Kennedy who promised to put a man on the moon in a decade. It summoned up the creativity and drive of Americans. Now we need a similar drive to provide new energy for America and eliminate our dependence on foreign oil. The states can show the way - but in the end the President and the Congress must either lead or get out of the way. This is a national security imperative and an economic opportunity that cannot be ignored.

-- Robert Borosage and Joel Rogers

Good Message

The Apollo Alliance is a great organization which put the message in a very positive, but serious context.  The energy bill is loaded with tax breaks for all kinds of polluting corporations that run this country on energy from the past.  The message of this reaction, that i like so much, is that there is great work being done on the state and local level.

I believe action on the local level is oftentimes a precursor to action on the national level, and I hope to see clean energy power our economy and provide jobs within it.  

The Apollo Alliance looks to be doing a good job of articulating a progressive vision for this country.

Very weak.

"The Apollo Alliance looks to be doing a good job of articulating a progressive vision for this country."

Unfortunately the actual proposals made by Apollo are very weak.  Their rhetoric is admirable though.

Maybe they can strengthen their plan as a reaction to this horribly rotten pork passed by those 76 craven, greedy senators.

It's hard to come up with adjectives harsh enough to adequately describe the lack of character of the  individuals who voted for this energy bill.

Now many democrats will be campaigning in '06 having voted for this travesty.  Not a good sign when any old GOPer can challenge them on their porcine vote.


http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

Apollo Alliance and Progressive Articulation

By reviewing the Alliance's points and plan, I'm finding their articulation of energy issues to be an inspiring one.  Their incorporation of economic issues and appeal to actual decision makers makes this an especially strong coalition.

The coalition hasn't put forth any actual legislation (although there is similar legislation calling for an Apollo-style renewable energy future), but is aiming towards incredibly beneficial ideas of both increasing renewable energy use and our overall energy efficiency.  It is calling for both of those proposals with the strong focus of economic and environmental benefits.

I would be interested to know, though, what the weak proposals that you have found are.  The Democratic Party is going to have to be a vehicle for realizing a progressive vision, but it needs to take a much stronger stance that it already has in favor of clean and renewable energies.  

When looking at energy and environmental issues, Democrats consistently take a stronger positions than Republicans.  There are Republicans who vote good votes on environmental and other issues, but by and large the Democrats are a much friendlier folk towards economic and environmental issues such as energy than Republicans by and large.  While I think there is a lot of work to do with Democrats (Democrats in the Senate voted overwhelmingly for the Energy Bill while opposition in the House was strongly Democrat), the Party can be a great vehicle towards progress.

There will certainly be Democrats campaigning on their Energy Bill vote, but there are many who are supportive of a beneficial future based on renewables.  That wing of the party, along with progressive organizations, can actively articulate an energy future.  I don't think ann energy future can be realized without a Party in power that is friendly towards renewable and clean energy sources.  

Reply

"I would be interested to know, though, what the weak proposals that you have found are."

I have detailed them here.

http://amazngdrx.myblogsite.com/blog/_archives/2005/7/30/1090022.html

(Sorry for the link, but I have been warned by the moderator that my participation here has received many complaints from authors and participants. A banning seems imminent.)


http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog

thanks

thanks for the link, i'm reading through it now.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks