Renewable energy and the devolution of power
The powers that be fear renewable energy, as it threatens their mechanisms of control.
Posted by David Roberts at 3:41 PM on 15 Jun 2005
There's a point about renewable energy that's been rattling around in my head for a while. Now one of our dear readers has gone and made it in comments, so let me take a whack at it here, drawing on what he said.
Imagine this: A (small-d) democratic, open-source, modular energy grid that accepts and distributes power from any source. Some regions or towns generate power with solar installations, some with wind turbines, some with hydropower, some with tide or wave power, and most with some combination of sources. The energy grid is a piece of federal infrastructure; access to it is a guaranteed public good.
This is, I think, the kind of energy grid most greens would like to see, and the kind they ultimately have in mind when they advocate for clean energy. (The details -- and they are legion -- will have to be hashed out, obviously.)
Now, consider a few characteristics of that system:
There's no central source of energy, access to which can be controlled or taxed. Local communities will be substantially more economically self-reliant, less subject to manipulation through strings-laden federal grants. Because energy sources will mostly be small-scale and locally owned, there will be no massive energy lobby cuddling up to politicians, lavishing them with donations in exchange for special favors.
The more you think it through, the more you realize: a lot of today's centers of power and influence stand to lose big in the transition to a post-oil, distributed-energy society. Power, both literal and political, will devolve downward and outward.
This is, in fact, just the point jimbeyer makes in this comment: "Renewable energy is about the permanent loss of a major source of control of much of modern humanity."
His guess is that the big PR push for the "hydrogen economy" is "an attempt to try to structure renewable energy and remaining coal resources into a mechanism of control." (I would make a similar point about the concurrent PR pushes for nuclear power and natural gas.)
I don't even chalk it up to a grand conspiracy on the part of the powers-that-be, really. It's just what they know. It's the model they're familiar with. They are accustomed to power and influence being centralized in the hands of elites. They will fight the passing of that model -- it portends their own obsolescence.
Renewable energy is part of the historical trend putting more and more power in the hands of individuals, fracturing the elites that once held it. That -- not feasibility, or economic viability, or dead friggin' birds -- is the biggest challenge it has to overcome.
|
|
- Search Gristmill using Grist's improved search.
Stay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
-
-
-
-
- persimmon on The Guardian uncovers a 'secret' World Bank biofuel report
- christophersj on To Half and to Hold
- gmobus on Oil prices will go ... up?
- manacker on 'Global warming stopped in 1998'
- hapa on 'Cooling a fevered planet' in Z Magazine
- hapa on Oil prices will go ... up?
- paz on Staycation, all I ever wanted
- Black Wallaby on 'Global warming stopped in 1998'
- amazingdrx on The Guardian uncovers a 'secret' World Bank biofuel report
- biodiversivist on The Guardian uncovers a 'secret' World Bank biofuel report
- amazingdrx on Energy ad wars begin
- amazingdrx on Oil prices will go ... up?
- Gar Lipow on 'Cooling a fevered planet' in Z Magazine
- Ron Steenblik on The Guardian uncovers a 'secret' World Bank biofuel report
- Wolverine on 'Cooling a fevered planet' in Z Magazine
- barry schwarz on 'Global warming stopped in 1998'
- NFF123 on Sustainable economy 101
- NFF123 on Just Beyond the Parking Lot
- NFF123 on Business sense
- Ron Steenblik on The Guardian uncovers a 'secret' World Bank biofuel report
