Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Bartlett on peak oil

At least one member of Congress realizes the size of the problem.

Posted by David Roberts at 2:04 PM on 03 May 2005

Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-Maryland) gave a series of speeches about peak oil on the floor of the House of Representatives. Mike Millikin of Green Car Congress -- who is, ahem, this week's Grist InterActivist -- discussed them here and here. Now (via Jeff), Global Public Media has an interview with Bartlett. It's absolutely fascinating -- the guy has obviously thought about and studied the issue extensively. It's rare to hear frank talk like this from a public official:

If we're going to get through this crisis period without an awful lot of pain, we're going to have to have the equivalent of a Manhattan-like Project. We're going to have to challenge, not just the American people, but the people of the world because the first thing we have to do is to have an enormously conservation effort so that we buy time. ... Not only do we need to meet the demands of our economies, we need to have a surplus of energy to invest in the renewables, an investment we have got to make. If we just let the clock run down we are going to face a very uncertain future with very traumatic dislocations. We should've started 25 years ago ... Putting it off is going to make it just more and more painful and more expensive.

Yup. Anyway, read the whole thing.

(If this were a Daily Grist story, I would title it "Roscoe Peak Oil Train." Lucky for you it's not.)

Update [2005-5-3 14:21:42 by Dave Roberts]: OMG, and I just noticed this bit. When he's asked what his colleagues' reaction has been to his speeches, he says:

They’d like to know more about it. It’s not something that they even thought about before. Most people have assumed, I have no idea why you would assume that, that oil is forever.
"Most people," perhaps, but the leaders of our country? Truly we are in good hands, no?

Green Car Congress

Glad you guys interviewed Mike Milkin. I'm the one who suggested his name (or maybe others did too?) and I've been a big fan of his website for a while.

--
SUVs are squared-out minivans.
Subsidies for big oil

If we're going to get through this crisis period without an awful lot of pain, we're going to have to have the equivalent of a Manhattan-like Project.

Yes well it's you guys, the politicians, who have subsidised oil extraction and oil consumption. It's you who've brought about this crisis. And your response? Another top-down, governnment-led, think big programme. Yeah, that's bound to work.

Policy as if outcomes mattered http://SocialGoals.com

Voting Record

The interview was interesting, but as a foreigner I know nothing about Bartlett so I did a little search:
http://www.issues2000.org/House/Roscoe_Bartlett_Energy_+_Oil.htm

Voted NO on raising CAFE standards; incentives for alternative fuels.
Voted NO on starting implementation of Kyoto Protocol

Seems odd, doesn't it, if he really worries about running out of oil.

Remember the 70s and 80s

President Carter took more of an active-government approach and his administration was marked by energy disruption.

Reagan let the markets do their thing (the opposite of a Manhattan project), and things calmed down nicely.

I'm curious what you all think of Peter Huber's book "Bottomless Well". I haven't read it yet, but was impressed when I saw him on C-SPAN.


Oil prices

dgreene369, USA may be important, but it doesn't control oil totally. The oil crisis of the 70s was caused by OPEC decisions, not whether or not USA used a market approach.

The Real Crisis & Real Pain

"If we're going to get through this crisis period without an awful lot of pain, we're going to have to have the equivalent of a Manhattan-like Project."

Excuse me, but the crisis here is that humans are extracting, transporting, refining, and burning oil, not that it might run out or be hard to extract some day.  Significant pain has been felt by the Earth, air, water, plants, and non-human animals since oil extraction began.  Human crybabies complaining about the possibility of oil running out make me either laugh or angry, depending on what mood I'm in.

Jeff Hoffman

Jeff Hoffman

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks