Staff Contributors
Guest Contributors

Obama mia!

Posted by David Roberts at 8:19 AM on 07 Nov 2005

Read more about: Barack Obama | politics

My near worship of Barack Obama is neither unique nor particularly well-concealed. I keep waiting for something to happen to break the spell, to start the inevitable backlash. But every time I hear his name, he's doing something at once politically savvy and substantively admirable.

To wit: On Friday, Obama put a hold on Bush's latest nomination to the EPA, and says he intends to put a hold on all future nominees. Why? He's sick of the EPA delaying new regulations on remodeling and renovating in houses that contain lead paint. Despite being ordered by Congress in 1992 to release such regulations by 1996, the agency has delayed again and again. Last year the Bush administration even looked into asking industry to adopt voluntary practices, to avoid regulation. (Shocking, I know.)

Obama considered putting a hold on last year's nomination of Marcus Peacock to the #2 slot at EPA, but held off when folks at the agency assured him they would issue regs by the end of the year. Then, last week, they told him they couldn't meet the deadline. So he called their bluff and placed the hold. Then:

EPA spokeswoman Eryn Witcher said Friday the agency will meet the Dec. 31 deadline after all.

"We're working on doing the rule by the end of the year," she said.

"Even one child impacted by lead is one child too many."

Obama then demanded that agency officials put that in writing.

Nice.

Let us count the ways in which this is a smart move:

First, on a substantive level, lead is a killer. It damages children's brains irreversibly. Its effects are widespread and pernicious, mostly propagated through old houses with lead in the paint. There's almost universal agreement that current regulations around lead paint are too lax. Bush and the EPA have been futzing around in the shadows with this stuff, hoping no one would notice. But now that Obama's thrown a spotlight on it, there's no defending it.

Second, it's great local politics. Illinois has the nation's highest levels of childhood lead poisoning. This is a high-profile stand of direct and immediate benefit to his constituents.

Third, it's great national politics. This is a golden issue that Dems have left lying unused. Obama spotted it and took it into the end zone (look, ma, my first football analogy!). This isn't a huge deal, but it's a targeted strike with almost no downside that positions him as courageous and principled.

Fourth, it's bona fide progressivism. Lead paint is a huge problem in poor neighborhoods. Obama's standing up for the disadvantaged, giving them a voice. It reminds people what progressives stand for without invoking any of the negative lefty stereotypes.

Day-to-day politics in the trenches, executed with wicked skill. I can't wait to see what he does next.

Problem

My wife and I are currently in the process of buying a house. It's in the city and was built in 1900, so it's almost definitely has lead paint. Therefore, we didn't get the lead paint test because, if it had lead paint, it would be a costly and time-consuming job of removing it so it was 'safe' to live there. We decided to just keep everything painted, even though it supposedly has lovely chestnut woodwork underneath all the crud.

So the problem is, if lead paint is such a problem how are we going to afford to dispose of it, where are these low-income families going to live while their houses are effectively gutted, and what will they come back to?

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
sign in
Search Gristmill
Subscribe
  • subscribe via RSSStay updated with the Gristmill RSS feed.
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Subscribe in Netvibes
  • Subscribe in Google
Using Gristmill
  • What is Gristmill?
  • Posting rules
The comments of Gristmill users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?

Gristmill is powered by Scoop.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks